Theresa A Jones, Victoria Nemchek, Michela Fracassi
{"title":"Experience-driven competition in neural reorganization after stroke.","authors":"Theresa A Jones, Victoria Nemchek, Michela Fracassi","doi":"10.1113/JP285565","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Behavioural experiences interact with regenerative responses to shape patterns of neural reorganization after stroke. This review is focused on the competitive nature of these behavioural experience effects. Interactions between learning-related plasticity and regenerative reactions have been found to underlie the establishment of new compensatory behaviours and the efficacy of motor rehabilitative training in rodent stroke models. Learning in intact brains depends on competitive and cooperative mechanisms of synaptic plasticity. Synapses are added in response to learning and selectively maintained and strengthened via activity-dependent competition. Long-term memories for experiences that occur closely in time can be weakened or enhanced by competitive or cooperative interactions in the time-dependent process of stabilizing synaptic changes. Rodent stroke model findings suggest that compensatory reliance on the non-paretic hand after stroke can shape and stabilize synaptic reorganization patterns in both hemispheres, to compete with the capacity for experiences of the paretic side to do so. However, the competitive edge of the non-paretic side can be countered by overlapping experiences of the paretic hand, and might even be shifted in a cooperative direction with skilfully coordinated bimanual experience. Advances in the basic understanding of learning-related synaptic competition are helping to inform the basis of experience-dependent variations in stroke outcome.</p>","PeriodicalId":50088,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Physiology-London","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Physiology-London","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1113/JP285565","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Behavioural experiences interact with regenerative responses to shape patterns of neural reorganization after stroke. This review is focused on the competitive nature of these behavioural experience effects. Interactions between learning-related plasticity and regenerative reactions have been found to underlie the establishment of new compensatory behaviours and the efficacy of motor rehabilitative training in rodent stroke models. Learning in intact brains depends on competitive and cooperative mechanisms of synaptic plasticity. Synapses are added in response to learning and selectively maintained and strengthened via activity-dependent competition. Long-term memories for experiences that occur closely in time can be weakened or enhanced by competitive or cooperative interactions in the time-dependent process of stabilizing synaptic changes. Rodent stroke model findings suggest that compensatory reliance on the non-paretic hand after stroke can shape and stabilize synaptic reorganization patterns in both hemispheres, to compete with the capacity for experiences of the paretic side to do so. However, the competitive edge of the non-paretic side can be countered by overlapping experiences of the paretic hand, and might even be shifted in a cooperative direction with skilfully coordinated bimanual experience. Advances in the basic understanding of learning-related synaptic competition are helping to inform the basis of experience-dependent variations in stroke outcome.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Physiology publishes full-length original Research Papers and Techniques for Physiology, which are short papers aimed at disseminating new techniques for physiological research. Articles solicited by the Editorial Board include Perspectives, Symposium Reports and Topical Reviews, which highlight areas of special physiological interest. CrossTalk articles are short editorial-style invited articles framing a debate between experts in the field on controversial topics. Letters to the Editor and Journal Club articles are also published. All categories of papers are subjected to peer reivew.
The Journal of Physiology welcomes submitted research papers in all areas of physiology. Authors should present original work that illustrates new physiological principles or mechanisms. Papers on work at the molecular level, at the level of the cell membrane, single cells, tissues or organs and on systems physiology are all acceptable. Theoretical papers and papers that use computational models to further our understanding of physiological processes will be considered if based on experimentally derived data and if the hypothesis advanced is directly amenable to experimental testing. While emphasis is on human and mammalian physiology, work on lower vertebrate or invertebrate preparations may be suitable if it furthers the understanding of the functioning of other organisms including mammals.