Experience-driven competition in neural reorganization after stroke.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 NEUROSCIENCES
Theresa A Jones, Victoria Nemchek, Michela Fracassi
{"title":"Experience-driven competition in neural reorganization after stroke.","authors":"Theresa A Jones, Victoria Nemchek, Michela Fracassi","doi":"10.1113/JP285565","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Behavioural experiences interact with regenerative responses to shape patterns of neural reorganization after stroke. This review is focused on the competitive nature of these behavioural experience effects. Interactions between learning-related plasticity and regenerative reactions have been found to underlie the establishment of new compensatory behaviours and the efficacy of motor rehabilitative training in rodent stroke models. Learning in intact brains depends on competitive and cooperative mechanisms of synaptic plasticity. Synapses are added in response to learning and selectively maintained and strengthened via activity-dependent competition. Long-term memories for experiences that occur closely in time can be weakened or enhanced by competitive or cooperative interactions in the time-dependent process of stabilizing synaptic changes. Rodent stroke model findings suggest that compensatory reliance on the non-paretic hand after stroke can shape and stabilize synaptic reorganization patterns in both hemispheres, to compete with the capacity for experiences of the paretic side to do so. However, the competitive edge of the non-paretic side can be countered by overlapping experiences of the paretic hand, and might even be shifted in a cooperative direction with skilfully coordinated bimanual experience. Advances in the basic understanding of learning-related synaptic competition are helping to inform the basis of experience-dependent variations in stroke outcome.</p>","PeriodicalId":50088,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Physiology-London","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Physiology-London","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1113/JP285565","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Behavioural experiences interact with regenerative responses to shape patterns of neural reorganization after stroke. This review is focused on the competitive nature of these behavioural experience effects. Interactions between learning-related plasticity and regenerative reactions have been found to underlie the establishment of new compensatory behaviours and the efficacy of motor rehabilitative training in rodent stroke models. Learning in intact brains depends on competitive and cooperative mechanisms of synaptic plasticity. Synapses are added in response to learning and selectively maintained and strengthened via activity-dependent competition. Long-term memories for experiences that occur closely in time can be weakened or enhanced by competitive or cooperative interactions in the time-dependent process of stabilizing synaptic changes. Rodent stroke model findings suggest that compensatory reliance on the non-paretic hand after stroke can shape and stabilize synaptic reorganization patterns in both hemispheres, to compete with the capacity for experiences of the paretic side to do so. However, the competitive edge of the non-paretic side can be countered by overlapping experiences of the paretic hand, and might even be shifted in a cooperative direction with skilfully coordinated bimanual experience. Advances in the basic understanding of learning-related synaptic competition are helping to inform the basis of experience-dependent variations in stroke outcome.

中风后神经重组中的经验驱动竞争
行为体验与再生反应相互作用,形成了中风后神经重组的模式。本综述的重点是这些行为经验效应的竞争性质。研究发现,在啮齿类中风模型中,与学习相关的可塑性和再生反应之间的相互作用是建立新的代偿行为和运动康复训练有效性的基础。完整大脑的学习依赖于突触可塑性的竞争与合作机制。突触会随着学习的进行而增加,并通过依赖活动的竞争选择性地维持和加强。在稳定突触变化的时间依赖性过程中,与时间密切相关的经验的长期记忆可通过竞争或合作性相互作用而减弱或增强。啮齿动物中风模型的研究结果表明,中风后对非瘫痪手的代偿性依赖可以塑造和稳定两个半球的突触重组模式,与瘫痪侧的经验能力形成竞争。然而,非瘫痪侧的竞争优势可以被瘫痪侧的重叠经验所抵消,甚至可以通过娴熟协调的双手经验向合作方向转变。对与学习相关的突触竞争的基本认识的进步有助于为中风结果中经验依赖性变化的基础提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Physiology-London
Journal of Physiology-London 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
7.30%
发文量
817
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Physiology publishes full-length original Research Papers and Techniques for Physiology, which are short papers aimed at disseminating new techniques for physiological research. Articles solicited by the Editorial Board include Perspectives, Symposium Reports and Topical Reviews, which highlight areas of special physiological interest. CrossTalk articles are short editorial-style invited articles framing a debate between experts in the field on controversial topics. Letters to the Editor and Journal Club articles are also published. All categories of papers are subjected to peer reivew. The Journal of Physiology welcomes submitted research papers in all areas of physiology. Authors should present original work that illustrates new physiological principles or mechanisms. Papers on work at the molecular level, at the level of the cell membrane, single cells, tissues or organs and on systems physiology are all acceptable. Theoretical papers and papers that use computational models to further our understanding of physiological processes will be considered if based on experimentally derived data and if the hypothesis advanced is directly amenable to experimental testing. While emphasis is on human and mammalian physiology, work on lower vertebrate or invertebrate preparations may be suitable if it furthers the understanding of the functioning of other organisms including mammals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信