Associations between job demand-control-support and high burnout risk among physicians in Sweden: a cross-sectional study.

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Filip Christiansen, Britta Elsert Gynning, Abid Lashari, Josefina Peláez Zuberbühler, Gun Johansson, Emma Brulin
{"title":"Associations between job demand-control-support and high burnout risk among physicians in Sweden: a cross-sectional study.","authors":"Filip Christiansen, Britta Elsert Gynning, Abid Lashari, Josefina Peláez Zuberbühler, Gun Johansson, Emma Brulin","doi":"10.1186/s12995-024-00441-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The knowledge about job demands, control, and support, and their potential associations with burnout risk among physicians in Sweden, is limited. This study aimed to explore (i) factors of the JobDemand-Control-Support (J-DCS) model across different groups of physicians in Sweden, (ii) their association with high burnout risk, and (iii) the potential buffering impact of job control and support.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cross-sectional data from the Swedish Longitudinal Occupational Health in Healthcare Survey (LOHHCS) study cohort was used. In 2021, a total of 2032 respondents submitted questionnaire data comprising J-DCS measures (i.e., job demands, workplace control and task-level control, and social support from peers and managers). Burnout risk was measured using the Burnout Assessment Tool. Binary logistic regression models were used to investigate the associations between the J-DCS variables and high burnout risk. Interaction analysis was performed to explore any moderation of the associations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Job demands were significantly associated with increased odds of high burnout risk (odds ratio (OR) 2.71, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.91-3.84. Workplace control (OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.35-0.71) and peer support (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.48-0.77) were significantly associated with reduced odds of high burnout risk. The interaction analysis showed no significant moderation of the association between job demands and high burnout risk by either peer support or workplace control, and no buffering impact was found.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Job demands were associated with high burnout risk among physicians in Sweden. Although workplace control and peer support had inverse associations with high burnout risk, no moderation or buffering impact on the association between job demands and high burnout risk was found. Longitudinal studies are needed to confirm these associations.</p>","PeriodicalId":48903,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology","volume":"19 1","pages":"42"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11520855/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12995-024-00441-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The knowledge about job demands, control, and support, and their potential associations with burnout risk among physicians in Sweden, is limited. This study aimed to explore (i) factors of the JobDemand-Control-Support (J-DCS) model across different groups of physicians in Sweden, (ii) their association with high burnout risk, and (iii) the potential buffering impact of job control and support.

Methods: Cross-sectional data from the Swedish Longitudinal Occupational Health in Healthcare Survey (LOHHCS) study cohort was used. In 2021, a total of 2032 respondents submitted questionnaire data comprising J-DCS measures (i.e., job demands, workplace control and task-level control, and social support from peers and managers). Burnout risk was measured using the Burnout Assessment Tool. Binary logistic regression models were used to investigate the associations between the J-DCS variables and high burnout risk. Interaction analysis was performed to explore any moderation of the associations.

Results: Job demands were significantly associated with increased odds of high burnout risk (odds ratio (OR) 2.71, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.91-3.84. Workplace control (OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.35-0.71) and peer support (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.48-0.77) were significantly associated with reduced odds of high burnout risk. The interaction analysis showed no significant moderation of the association between job demands and high burnout risk by either peer support or workplace control, and no buffering impact was found.

Conclusion: Job demands were associated with high burnout risk among physicians in Sweden. Although workplace control and peer support had inverse associations with high burnout risk, no moderation or buffering impact on the association between job demands and high burnout risk was found. Longitudinal studies are needed to confirm these associations.

瑞典医生的工作需求-控制-支持与高职业倦怠风险之间的关系:一项横断面研究。
背景:瑞典医生对工作要求、控制和支持及其与职业倦怠风险的潜在关联的了解十分有限。本研究旨在探讨(i)瑞典不同医生群体中工作要求-控制-支持(J-DCS)模型的因素;(ii)它们与高职业倦怠风险的关联;以及(iii)工作控制和支持的潜在缓冲作用:方法:采用瑞典医疗保健职业健康纵向调查(LOHHCS)研究队列中的横截面数据。2021 年,共有 2032 名受访者提交了包含 J-DCS 测量(即工作要求、工作场所控制和任务层面控制,以及来自同伴和管理人员的社会支持)的问卷数据。倦怠风险使用倦怠评估工具进行测量。二元逻辑回归模型用于研究 J-DCS 变量与高职业倦怠风险之间的关联。此外,还进行了交互分析,以探究这些关联的调节作用:结果:工作要求与高职业倦怠风险几率的增加明显相关(几率比(OR)2.71,95% 置信区间(CI)1.91-3.84)。工作场所控制(OR 0.50,95% 置信区间 0.35-0.71)和同伴支持(OR 0.61,95% 置信区间 0.48-0.77)与高职业倦怠风险几率的降低有显著相关性。交互分析表明,同伴支持或工作场所控制对工作要求与高职业倦怠风险之间的关联没有明显的调节作用,也没有发现缓冲作用:结论:工作要求与瑞典医生的高职业倦怠风险有关。尽管工作场所控制和同伴支持与高职业倦怠风险呈反向关系,但并未发现工作要求与高职业倦怠风险之间的关系具有调节或缓冲作用。需要进行纵向研究来证实这些关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology
Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: Aimed at clinicians and researchers, the Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology is a multi-disciplinary, open access journal which publishes original research on the clinical and scientific aspects of occupational and environmental health. With high-quality peer review and quick decision times, we welcome submissions on the diagnosis, prevention, management, and scientific analysis of occupational diseases, injuries, and disability. The journal also covers the promotion of health of workers, their families, and communities, and ranges from rehabilitation to tropical medicine and public health aspects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信