Impact of computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging registration on rehabilitation after percutaneous endoscopic decompression for lumbar stenosis: Retrospective study.

IF 2 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Xiao-Bo Guo, Jin-Wei Chen, Jun-Yang Liu, Jiang-Tao Jin
{"title":"Impact of computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging registration on rehabilitation after percutaneous endoscopic decompression for lumbar stenosis: Retrospective study.","authors":"Xiao-Bo Guo, Jin-Wei Chen, Jun-Yang Liu, Jiang-Tao Jin","doi":"10.5312/wjo.v15.i10.939","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar decompression (PELD) shows promise for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) treatment, but its use is limited by the disease's complexity and procedural challenges.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>In this study, the effects of preoperative planning and intraoperative guidance with computed tomography (CT)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) registration techniques on PELD for LSS and postoperative rehabilitation outcomes were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study was conducted with data from patients who underwent PELD for LSS between January 2021 and December 2023. Patients were assigned to preoperative CT/MRI registration and control groups. Data collected included the operative time, length of hospital stay, visual analog scale (VAS) scores for low back and leg pain, and the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) lumbar spine score. Differences between groups were assessed using Student's <i>t</i> test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 135 patients (71 in the CT/MRI registration group, 64 in the control group) were analyzed. The operative time was significantly shorter in the CT/MRI registration group (<i>P</i> = 0.007). At 2 months postoperatively, both groups showed significant reductions in VAS leg and low back pain scores (all <i>P</i> < 0.001) and improvements in the JOA score (both <i>P</i> < 0.001). No complication or death occurred. Preoperatively, pain and JOA scores were similar between groups (<i>P</i> = 0.830, <i>P</i> = 0.470, and <i>P</i> = 0.287, respectively). At 2 months postoperatively, patients in the CT/MRI registration group reported lower leg and low back pain levels (<i>P</i> < 0.001 and <i>P</i> = 0.001, respectively) and had higher JOA scores (<i>P</i> = 0.004) than did patients in the control group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Preoperative CT/MRI registration for PELD for LSS reduced the operative time and VAS pain scores at 2 months and improved JOA scores, demonstrating enhanced effectiveness and safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":47843,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Orthopedics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11514552/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Orthopedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v15.i10.939","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar decompression (PELD) shows promise for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) treatment, but its use is limited by the disease's complexity and procedural challenges.

Aim: In this study, the effects of preoperative planning and intraoperative guidance with computed tomography (CT)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) registration techniques on PELD for LSS and postoperative rehabilitation outcomes were evaluated.

Methods: This retrospective study was conducted with data from patients who underwent PELD for LSS between January 2021 and December 2023. Patients were assigned to preoperative CT/MRI registration and control groups. Data collected included the operative time, length of hospital stay, visual analog scale (VAS) scores for low back and leg pain, and the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) lumbar spine score. Differences between groups were assessed using Student's t test.

Results: Data from 135 patients (71 in the CT/MRI registration group, 64 in the control group) were analyzed. The operative time was significantly shorter in the CT/MRI registration group (P = 0.007). At 2 months postoperatively, both groups showed significant reductions in VAS leg and low back pain scores (all P < 0.001) and improvements in the JOA score (both P < 0.001). No complication or death occurred. Preoperatively, pain and JOA scores were similar between groups (P = 0.830, P = 0.470, and P = 0.287, respectively). At 2 months postoperatively, patients in the CT/MRI registration group reported lower leg and low back pain levels (P < 0.001 and P = 0.001, respectively) and had higher JOA scores (P = 0.004) than did patients in the control group.

Conclusion: Preoperative CT/MRI registration for PELD for LSS reduced the operative time and VAS pain scores at 2 months and improved JOA scores, demonstrating enhanced effectiveness and safety.

计算机断层扫描/磁共振成像注册对腰椎管狭窄经皮内窥镜减压术后康复的影响:回顾性研究。
背景:经皮内窥镜腰椎减压术(PELD)有望用于腰椎管狭窄症(LSS)的治疗,但由于该疾病的复杂性和手术挑战,其应用受到了限制。目的:本研究评估了术前规划和术中计算机断层扫描(CT)/磁共振成像(MRI)登记技术的引导对经皮内窥镜腰椎减压术(PELD)治疗LSS和术后康复效果的影响:这项回顾性研究的数据来自2021年1月至2023年12月期间接受PELD治疗的LSS患者。患者被分配到术前 CT/MRI 登记组和对照组。收集的数据包括手术时间、住院时间、腰腿痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分以及日本骨科协会(JOA)腰椎评分。组间差异采用学生 t 检验:结果:分析了 135 名患者的数据(CT/MRI 登记组 71 人,对照组 64 人)。CT/MRI 登记组的手术时间明显更短(P = 0.007)。术后 2 个月,两组患者的 VAS 腿部和腰背部疼痛评分均有明显降低(均 P < 0.001),JOA 评分也有改善(均 P < 0.001)。无并发症或死亡发生。术前,两组患者的疼痛和 JOA 评分相似(分别为 P = 0.830、P = 0.470 和 P = 0.287)。术后 2 个月时,CT/MRI 登记组患者的腿部和腰部疼痛程度低于对照组患者(分别为 P < 0.001 和 P = 0.001),JOA 评分也高于对照组患者(P = 0.004):结论:PELD 治疗 LSS 的术前 CT/MRI 登记缩短了手术时间,减少了 2 个月时的 VAS 疼痛评分,提高了 JOA 评分,显示出更高的有效性和安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
814
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信