Clinical implications of reconsideration of enthesitis/enthesopathy/enthesial erosion, as tendon attachment-localized avulsions and stress fracture equivalents.

IF 2 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Bruce M Rothschild
{"title":"Clinical implications of reconsideration of enthesitis/enthesopathy/enthesial erosion, as tendon attachment-localized avulsions and stress fracture equivalents.","authors":"Bruce M Rothschild","doi":"10.5312/wjo.v15.i10.902","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recognizing the mechanical origin of enthesitis/enthesopathy and the avulsion-nature of what had previously been considered erosions, it seems inappropriate to attribute it to stresses related to a person's normal activities. Conversely, sudden or unconditioned repetitive stresses appears the more likely culprit. Studies of enthesial reaction have lacked standardization as to findings present among individuals who appear to be healthy. Clinical evaluation by palpation and manipulation may be as effective as application of radiologic techniques. Recognition of the mechanical nature of the disease, including individuals with inflammatory arthritis suggests prescription of mechanical solutions that reduce stresses across the involved enthesis.</p>","PeriodicalId":47843,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Orthopedics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11514551/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Orthopedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v15.i10.902","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recognizing the mechanical origin of enthesitis/enthesopathy and the avulsion-nature of what had previously been considered erosions, it seems inappropriate to attribute it to stresses related to a person's normal activities. Conversely, sudden or unconditioned repetitive stresses appears the more likely culprit. Studies of enthesial reaction have lacked standardization as to findings present among individuals who appear to be healthy. Clinical evaluation by palpation and manipulation may be as effective as application of radiologic techniques. Recognition of the mechanical nature of the disease, including individuals with inflammatory arthritis suggests prescription of mechanical solutions that reduce stresses across the involved enthesis.

重新考虑作为肌腱附着局部撕脱和应力性骨折等同物的粘连炎/粘连病/粘连侵蚀的临床意义。
认识到粘连炎/粘连病的机械起源以及以前被认为是侵蚀的撕脱性质,将其归咎于与人的正常活动有关的压力似乎是不恰当的。相反,突然或无条件的重复压力似乎更有可能是罪魁祸首。对于看似健康的人,内脏反应的研究结果缺乏标准化。通过触诊和手法进行临床评估可能与应用放射学技术同样有效。认识到疾病的机械性质,包括患有炎症性关节炎的患者,建议采用机械解决方案,以减少受累内眦的压力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
814
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信