Fatma Mohamed Elmansy, Mohamed Goda Elbqry, Azza Anwar Aly, Ahmed Nader Negm, Ahmed Ibrahem Hafez, Samia Eaid Elgazzar
{"title":"Intensive Care Nurses' Performance of Open versus Closed Endotracheal Suction on Critically Ill Patients in Ismailia City.","authors":"Fatma Mohamed Elmansy, Mohamed Goda Elbqry, Azza Anwar Aly, Ahmed Nader Negm, Ahmed Ibrahem Hafez, Samia Eaid Elgazzar","doi":"10.4103/ijnmr.ijnmr_351_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endotracheal Tube Suctioning (ETS), which involves either an open or closed suctioning system, is a crucial practice for mechanically ventilated patients. The nursing practice of airway suctioning is inevitable. This study was designed to compare the intensive care nurses' performance of open versus closed endotracheal suction on critically ill patients in Ismailia City.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A non-participant structured observational study design was conducted on a convenient sample (N = 63) at intensive care units at a teaching hospital through March and August 2022 to evaluate how nurses practice different procedures in open suctioning compared with the closed suctioning system of Endotracheal Suction (ES) through a 32-item structured checklist. Additionally, authors compared their levels of knowledge in both suctioning systems.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Approximately 75% and 65% of the study participants had a satisfactory level of knowledge about the open system compared with the closed system, respectively. The total percentage of patients who achieved a satisfactory level of practice was 72% for the open-system group, compared with 56% for the closed-system group. Overall, there were significant differences between total nurses' performances in the open-system and closed-system systems. Independent sample t-tests revealed a statistically significant correlation between overall nurses' performance in both systems (t = 6.04, <i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings revealed significant differences in nurses' performance between open and closed-system suctioning. The researchers recommend in-service-led training programs to improve nurses' performance, and other studies with larger sample sizes should be supported.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11521131/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijnmr.ijnmr_351_22","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Endotracheal Tube Suctioning (ETS), which involves either an open or closed suctioning system, is a crucial practice for mechanically ventilated patients. The nursing practice of airway suctioning is inevitable. This study was designed to compare the intensive care nurses' performance of open versus closed endotracheal suction on critically ill patients in Ismailia City.
Materials and methods: A non-participant structured observational study design was conducted on a convenient sample (N = 63) at intensive care units at a teaching hospital through March and August 2022 to evaluate how nurses practice different procedures in open suctioning compared with the closed suctioning system of Endotracheal Suction (ES) through a 32-item structured checklist. Additionally, authors compared their levels of knowledge in both suctioning systems.
Results: Approximately 75% and 65% of the study participants had a satisfactory level of knowledge about the open system compared with the closed system, respectively. The total percentage of patients who achieved a satisfactory level of practice was 72% for the open-system group, compared with 56% for the closed-system group. Overall, there were significant differences between total nurses' performances in the open-system and closed-system systems. Independent sample t-tests revealed a statistically significant correlation between overall nurses' performance in both systems (t = 6.04, p < 0.001).
Conclusions: The findings revealed significant differences in nurses' performance between open and closed-system suctioning. The researchers recommend in-service-led training programs to improve nurses' performance, and other studies with larger sample sizes should be supported.
期刊介绍：
Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance.
Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
