A Systematic Review of Determinants Influencing Family Planning and Contraceptive Use.

IF 1 Q3 NURSING
Iranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research Pub Date : 2024-09-04 eCollection Date: 2024-09-01 DOI:10.4103/ijnmr.ijnmr_321_23
Pipit Feriani, Esti Yunitasari, Ferry Efendi, Ilya Krisnana, Rini Ernawati, Niken A Tianingrum, Nurus Safaah
{"title":"A Systematic Review of Determinants Influencing Family Planning and Contraceptive Use.","authors":"Pipit Feriani, Esti Yunitasari, Ferry Efendi, Ilya Krisnana, Rini Ernawati, Niken A Tianingrum, Nurus Safaah","doi":"10.4103/ijnmr.ijnmr_321_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Reproductive health, crucial for public health and sustainable development, encompasses family planning and contraceptive use. However, global disparities persist in the adoption of family planning, highlighting the need for a comprehensive understanding of the complex factors shaping these reproductive health choices.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses guidelines, we conducted a systematic search of the Scopus, ScienceDirect, PubMed, Web of Science, and ProQuest databases from July to August 2023. Inclusive criteria covered various study designs and populations, ranging from individuals to communities, and encompassed sociocultural factors. The review included open access articles published between 2018 and 2023, utilizing a combination of the keywords: Family planning determinants, Contraceptive use factors, Sociocultural factors in family planning, Individual-level influences on family planning, and Factors affecting contraceptive choices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 25 selected studies underscore the critical influence of determinants at both individual and community levels in shaping family planning behaviors. Key drivers at the individual level included education, age, knowledge, and attitudes. At the community level, factors such as geographical disparities and healthcare accessibility played pivotal roles. Sociocultural determinants, including media exposure, gender norms, and spousal dynamics, highlighted the need for culturally sensitive strategies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Advancing equitable family planning requires education, improved access, peer influence, and the active participation of husbands and male partners. Comprehensive programs should bridge the gap between knowledge and action, reduce disparities, and ensure equal access to contraception. Context-specific research and evaluating interventions are crucial steps toward achieving global reproductive health objectives.</p>","PeriodicalId":44816,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11521132/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijnmr.ijnmr_321_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Reproductive health, crucial for public health and sustainable development, encompasses family planning and contraceptive use. However, global disparities persist in the adoption of family planning, highlighting the need for a comprehensive understanding of the complex factors shaping these reproductive health choices.

Materials and methods: Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses guidelines, we conducted a systematic search of the Scopus, ScienceDirect, PubMed, Web of Science, and ProQuest databases from July to August 2023. Inclusive criteria covered various study designs and populations, ranging from individuals to communities, and encompassed sociocultural factors. The review included open access articles published between 2018 and 2023, utilizing a combination of the keywords: Family planning determinants, Contraceptive use factors, Sociocultural factors in family planning, Individual-level influences on family planning, and Factors affecting contraceptive choices.

Results: Data from 25 selected studies underscore the critical influence of determinants at both individual and community levels in shaping family planning behaviors. Key drivers at the individual level included education, age, knowledge, and attitudes. At the community level, factors such as geographical disparities and healthcare accessibility played pivotal roles. Sociocultural determinants, including media exposure, gender norms, and spousal dynamics, highlighted the need for culturally sensitive strategies.

Conclusions: Advancing equitable family planning requires education, improved access, peer influence, and the active participation of husbands and male partners. Comprehensive programs should bridge the gap between knowledge and action, reduce disparities, and ensure equal access to contraception. Context-specific research and evaluating interventions are crucial steps toward achieving global reproductive health objectives.

对影响计划生育和避孕药具使用的决定因素进行系统回顾。
背景:生殖健康对公共卫生和可持续发展至关重要,它包括计划生育和避孕药具的使用。然而,全球在采用计划生育方面仍然存在差距,这突出表明有必要全面了解影响这些生殖健康选择的复杂因素:根据《系统综述和元分析首选报告项目》指南,我们在 2023 年 7 月至 8 月期间对 Scopus、ScienceDirect、PubMed、Web of Science 和 ProQuest 数据库进行了系统检索。纳入标准涵盖了从个人到社区的各种研究设计和人群,并包含了社会文化因素。综述包括 2018 年至 2023 年间发表的开放存取文章,并使用了关键词组合:计划生育决定因素、避孕药具使用因素、计划生育中的社会文化因素、个人层面对计划生育的影响、影响避孕药具选择的因素:来自 25 项选定研究的数据强调了个人和社区层面的决定因素对计划生育行为的重要影响。个人层面的主要驱动因素包括教育、年龄、知识和态度。在社区层面,地理差异和医疗保健的可及性等因素发挥了关键作用。社会文化方面的决定因素包括媒体曝光、性别规范和配偶动态,这些因素突出表明需要采取对文化敏感的策略:推进公平的计划生育需要教育、改善获取途径、同伴影响以及丈夫和男性伴侣的积极参与。综合计划应弥合知识与行动之间的差距,缩小差距,并确保平等获得避孕药具。针对具体情况进行研究和评估干预措施是实现全球生殖健康目标的关键步骤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
79
审稿时长
46 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信