In vitro physical properties and clinical stability of reused orthodontic miniscrews: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.6 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Arezoo Jahanbin, Farnaz Ziya, Erfan Bardideh, Sara Hafez, Mostafa Abtahi
{"title":"In vitro physical properties and clinical stability of reused orthodontic miniscrews: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Arezoo Jahanbin, Farnaz Ziya, Erfan Bardideh, Sara Hafez, Mostafa Abtahi","doi":"10.1016/j.ejwf.2024.09.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While orthodontic miniscrews have been widely documented for their successful application, limited research exists on the stability and effectiveness of reused miniscrews. This systematic review aims to evaluate the stability and effectiveness of reused miniscrews in orthodontic treatments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An electronic search was conducted for studies published up to February 2024 across MEDLINE, Web of Science, EMBASE, Scopus, and Cochrane CENTRAL. Additionally, gray literature sources and manual searches of prominent orthodontic journals from 2010 to 2023, were also examined. Studies that investigated the use of miniscrews after retrieval and sterilization involving both in vitro studies and clinical trials were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 946 searched studies, 18 were finally included in our review. Thirteen studies investigated retrieved and sterilized miniscrews, while five examined unused and sterilized miniscrews to isolate the effects of sterilization. After performing a meta-analysis on in vitro studies, no significant difference in insertion, removal, or fracture torque between retrieved and unretrieved miniscrews was found, though sterilized miniscrews had a statistically significant increase in insertion torque without affecting fracture resistance. Meta-analysis of clinical studies revealed that retrieved miniscrews exhibited a significantly higher failure rate with a risk ratio of 0.46 (95% confidence interval = 0.24, 0.69), indicating a higher likelihood of failure on reuse.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There were no significant differences in insertion and fracture torque between new and reused miniscrews. However, reused miniscrews were associated with a higher failure rate. This outcome may be influenced by factors such as sterilization methods, insertion technique, and patient-specific anatomical considerations.</p>","PeriodicalId":43456,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejwf.2024.09.005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: While orthodontic miniscrews have been widely documented for their successful application, limited research exists on the stability and effectiveness of reused miniscrews. This systematic review aims to evaluate the stability and effectiveness of reused miniscrews in orthodontic treatments.

Methods: An electronic search was conducted for studies published up to February 2024 across MEDLINE, Web of Science, EMBASE, Scopus, and Cochrane CENTRAL. Additionally, gray literature sources and manual searches of prominent orthodontic journals from 2010 to 2023, were also examined. Studies that investigated the use of miniscrews after retrieval and sterilization involving both in vitro studies and clinical trials were included.

Results: From 946 searched studies, 18 were finally included in our review. Thirteen studies investigated retrieved and sterilized miniscrews, while five examined unused and sterilized miniscrews to isolate the effects of sterilization. After performing a meta-analysis on in vitro studies, no significant difference in insertion, removal, or fracture torque between retrieved and unretrieved miniscrews was found, though sterilized miniscrews had a statistically significant increase in insertion torque without affecting fracture resistance. Meta-analysis of clinical studies revealed that retrieved miniscrews exhibited a significantly higher failure rate with a risk ratio of 0.46 (95% confidence interval = 0.24, 0.69), indicating a higher likelihood of failure on reuse.

Conclusion: There were no significant differences in insertion and fracture torque between new and reused miniscrews. However, reused miniscrews were associated with a higher failure rate. This outcome may be influenced by factors such as sterilization methods, insertion technique, and patient-specific anatomical considerations.

重复使用的正畸微型螺钉的体外物理特性和临床稳定性:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:虽然正畸微型螺钉的成功应用已被广泛记录,但关于重复使用微型螺钉的稳定性和有效性的研究却很有限。本系统性综述旨在评估重复使用的微型螺钉在正畸治疗中的稳定性和有效性:通过电子检索,在 MEDLINE、Web of Science、EMBASE、Scopus 和 Cochrane CENTRAL 中检索了截至 2024 年 2 月发表的研究。此外,还对 2010 年至 2023 年期间的灰色文献来源和著名正畸期刊进行了人工检索。结果:结果:在检索的 946 篇研究中,最终有 18 篇被纳入我们的综述。其中 13 项研究调查了取回和灭菌后的微型螺钉,5 项研究调查了未使用和灭菌后的微型螺钉,以区分灭菌的影响。对体外研究进行荟萃分析后发现,已取回和未取回的迷你螺钉在插入、拔出或折断扭矩方面没有显著差异,但经过消毒的迷你螺钉在插入扭矩方面有统计学意义上的显著增加,且不影响抗折断性。临床研究的 Meta 分析显示,取回的微型螺钉的失败率明显更高,风险比为 0.46(95% 置信区间 = 0.24,0.69),表明重复使用时失败的可能性更高:结论:新的和重复使用的微型螺钉在插入和折断扭矩方面没有明显差异。然而,重复使用的微型螺钉失灵率较高。这一结果可能受到消毒方法、插入技术和患者特定解剖考虑等因素的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists
Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.80%
发文量
34
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信