Where Technology Leads, the Problems Follow. Technosolutionism and the Dutch Contact Tracing App.

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Philosophy and Technology Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-28 DOI:10.1007/s13347-024-00807-y
Lotje E Siffels, Tamar Sharon
{"title":"Where Technology Leads, the Problems Follow. Technosolutionism and the Dutch Contact Tracing App.","authors":"Lotje E Siffels, Tamar Sharon","doi":"10.1007/s13347-024-00807-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In April 2020, in the midst of its first pandemic lockdown, the Dutch government announced plans to develop a contact tracing app to help contain the spread of the coronavirus - the <i>Coronamelder.</i> Originally intended to address the problem of the overburdening of manual contract tracers, by the time the app was released six months later, the problem it sought to solve had drastically changed, without the solution undergoing any modification, making it a prime example of technosolutionism. While numerous critics have mobilised the concept of technosolutionism, the questions of how technosolutionism works in practice and which specific harms it can provoke have been understudied. In this paper we advance a thick conception of technosolutionism which, drawing on Evgeny Morozov, distinguishes it from the notion of technological fix, and, drawing on constructivism, emphasizes its constructivist dimension. Using this concept, we closely follow the problem that the Coronamelder aimed to solve and how it shifted over time to fit the Coronamelder solution, rather than the other way around. We argue that, although problems are always constructed, technosolutionist problems are <i>badly</i> constructed, insofar as the careful and cautious deliberation which should accompany problem construction in public policy is absent in the case of technosolutionism. This can lead to three harms: a subversion of democratic decision-making; the presence of powerful new actors in the public policy context - here Big Tech; and the creation of \"orphan problems\", whereby the initial problems that triggered the need to develop a (techno)solution are left behind. We question whether the most popular form of technology ethics today, which focuses predominantly on the <i>design</i> of technology, is well-equipped to address these technosolutionist harms, insofar as such a focus may preclude critical thinking about whether or not technology should be the solution in the first place.</p>","PeriodicalId":39065,"journal":{"name":"Philosophy and Technology","volume":"37 4","pages":"125"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11519188/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophy and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-024-00807-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In April 2020, in the midst of its first pandemic lockdown, the Dutch government announced plans to develop a contact tracing app to help contain the spread of the coronavirus - the Coronamelder. Originally intended to address the problem of the overburdening of manual contract tracers, by the time the app was released six months later, the problem it sought to solve had drastically changed, without the solution undergoing any modification, making it a prime example of technosolutionism. While numerous critics have mobilised the concept of technosolutionism, the questions of how technosolutionism works in practice and which specific harms it can provoke have been understudied. In this paper we advance a thick conception of technosolutionism which, drawing on Evgeny Morozov, distinguishes it from the notion of technological fix, and, drawing on constructivism, emphasizes its constructivist dimension. Using this concept, we closely follow the problem that the Coronamelder aimed to solve and how it shifted over time to fit the Coronamelder solution, rather than the other way around. We argue that, although problems are always constructed, technosolutionist problems are badly constructed, insofar as the careful and cautious deliberation which should accompany problem construction in public policy is absent in the case of technosolutionism. This can lead to three harms: a subversion of democratic decision-making; the presence of powerful new actors in the public policy context - here Big Tech; and the creation of "orphan problems", whereby the initial problems that triggered the need to develop a (techno)solution are left behind. We question whether the most popular form of technology ethics today, which focuses predominantly on the design of technology, is well-equipped to address these technosolutionist harms, insofar as such a focus may preclude critical thinking about whether or not technology should be the solution in the first place.

技术引领,问题随行。技术解决主义与荷兰联系人追踪应用程序。
2020 年 4 月,荷兰政府在其首次大流行病封锁期间宣布计划开发一款联系人追踪应用程序--Coronamelder,以帮助遏制冠状病毒的传播。该应用程序的初衷是为了解决人工合同追踪人员负担过重的问题,但在六个月后发布时,它所要解决的问题已经发生了巨大变化,而解决方案却没有进行任何修改,这使其成为技术解决主义的一个典型例子。尽管许多批评家都提出了技术解决主义的概念,但关于技术解决主义在实践中如何运作以及它可能引发哪些具体危害的问题却一直没有得到充分研究。在本文中,我们借鉴叶夫根尼-莫罗佐夫(Evgeny Morozov)的观点,将技术解决主义与技术固定概念区分开来,并借鉴建构主义的观点,强调其建构主义维度。利用这一概念,我们密切关注 Coronamelder 旨在解决的问题,以及随着时间的推移,问题是如何转变以适应 Coronamelder 解决方案的,而不是相反。我们认为,尽管问题总是被建构出来的,但技术解决主义的问题被建构得很糟糕,因为在公共政策中,问题建构过程中本应伴随着小心谨慎的讨论,但技术解决主义却没有这样做。这可能导致三种危害:颠覆民主决策;公共政策中出现强大的新参与者--这里指的是大科技公司;以及产生 "孤儿问题",即最初引发制定(技术)解决方案需求的问题被抛在脑后。我们质疑当今最流行的技术伦理形式(主要关注技术的设计)是否有能力解决这些技术解决主义的危害,因为这种关注可能会排除对技术是否首先应该成为解决方案的批判性思考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Philosophy and Technology
Philosophy and Technology Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
98
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信