The effect of peer tutoring on pediatric nursing education: a systematic review.

Q3 Medicine
Child Health Nursing Research Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-31 DOI:10.4094/chnr.2024.024
Hyun Young Koo, Hyeran An, Bo Ryeong Lee
{"title":"The effect of peer tutoring on pediatric nursing education: a systematic review.","authors":"Hyun Young Koo, Hyeran An, Bo Ryeong Lee","doi":"10.4094/chnr.2024.024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to systematically review studies on the effect of peer tutoring on pediatric nursing education for nursing students and identify its contents and characteristics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search was conducted from November to December 2023 across databases including PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, CINAHL, ProQuest, and others. We included both published and unpublished literature in English or Korean. Three reviewers independently screened and selected eligible studies that involved undergraduate nursing students participating in peer tutoring programs focused on pediatric nursing education. We analyzed quantitative outcomes related to learning effects and learner responses. The quality of the studies was assessed using the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials and the risk of bias assessment tool for non-randomized studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five studies were reviewed, encompassing randomized controlled trials, a non-randomized controlled trial, a cohort study, and a before-after study. These interventions were conducted in school settings or pediatric clinical environments and featured different forms of peer teaching: horizontal, near-peer, and reciprocal. The tutor-to-tutee ratios ranged from 1:3 to 1:36.5. The educational content covered nursing care for major neonatal diseases, communication skills, medication administration, and resuscitation techniques. Significant improvements in cognitive knowledge and communication skills were observed among nursing students. However, there was noticeable variability in the design and reporting of the studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Peer tutoring programs can effectively enhance pediatric nursing education by improving nursing students' knowledge and skills. For future meta-analyses, more studies in this field reported according to reporting guidelines are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":37360,"journal":{"name":"Child Health Nursing Research","volume":"30 4","pages":"215-226"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11532353/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child Health Nursing Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4094/chnr.2024.024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to systematically review studies on the effect of peer tutoring on pediatric nursing education for nursing students and identify its contents and characteristics.

Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted from November to December 2023 across databases including PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, CINAHL, ProQuest, and others. We included both published and unpublished literature in English or Korean. Three reviewers independently screened and selected eligible studies that involved undergraduate nursing students participating in peer tutoring programs focused on pediatric nursing education. We analyzed quantitative outcomes related to learning effects and learner responses. The quality of the studies was assessed using the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials and the risk of bias assessment tool for non-randomized studies.

Results: Five studies were reviewed, encompassing randomized controlled trials, a non-randomized controlled trial, a cohort study, and a before-after study. These interventions were conducted in school settings or pediatric clinical environments and featured different forms of peer teaching: horizontal, near-peer, and reciprocal. The tutor-to-tutee ratios ranged from 1:3 to 1:36.5. The educational content covered nursing care for major neonatal diseases, communication skills, medication administration, and resuscitation techniques. Significant improvements in cognitive knowledge and communication skills were observed among nursing students. However, there was noticeable variability in the design and reporting of the studies.

Conclusion: Peer tutoring programs can effectively enhance pediatric nursing education by improving nursing students' knowledge and skills. For future meta-analyses, more studies in this field reported according to reporting guidelines are needed.

同伴辅导对儿科护理教育的影响:系统综述。
目的:本研究旨在系统回顾有关护理学生同伴辅导对儿科护理教育影响的研究,并确定其内容和特点:从 2023 年 11 月到 12 月,我们在 PubMed、Embase、CENTRAL、CINAHL、ProQuest 等数据库中进行了全面检索。我们纳入了已发表和未发表的英文或韩文文献。三位审稿人独立筛选并选出了符合条件的研究,这些研究涉及本科护理学生参与以儿科护理教育为重点的同伴辅导项目。我们分析了与学习效果和学习者反应相关的定量结果。我们使用修订版 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具评估了随机试验的研究质量,并使用偏倚风险评估工具评估了非随机研究的质量:共审查了五项研究,包括随机对照试验、一项非随机对照试验、一项队列研究和一项前后对比研究。这些干预措施都是在学校或儿科临床环境中进行的,采用了不同形式的同伴教学:横向、近似同伴和互惠。导师与受训者的比例从 1:3 到 1:36.5 不等。教学内容包括新生儿主要疾病的护理、沟通技巧、用药和复苏技术。据观察,护生在认知知识和沟通技能方面都有显著提高。然而,研究的设计和报告存在明显差异:结论:朋辈辅导项目可有效提高护理学生的知识和技能,从而加强儿科护理教育。未来的荟萃分析需要更多根据报告指南进行报告的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Child Health Nursing Research
Child Health Nursing Research Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信