Awareness of infection care terms among outpatients and carers in a public health facility: a cross-sectional survey.

Q1 Medicine
Wellcome Open Research Pub Date : 2024-10-09 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.12688/wellcomeopenres.20162.2
Ebruphiyo Ruth Useh, Bongeka Mfeketo, Okuhle Mbengo, Innocent Karangwa, Timothy Pennel, Adam Boutall, Salome Maswime, Linda Pohl, Esmita Charani, Marc Mendelson, Oluchi Mbamalu
{"title":"Awareness of infection care terms among outpatients and carers in a public health facility: a cross-sectional survey.","authors":"Ebruphiyo Ruth Useh, Bongeka Mfeketo, Okuhle Mbengo, Innocent Karangwa, Timothy Pennel, Adam Boutall, Salome Maswime, Linda Pohl, Esmita Charani, Marc Mendelson, Oluchi Mbamalu","doi":"10.12688/wellcomeopenres.20162.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>As healthcare recipients and individuals affected by antimicrobial resistance (AMR), patients and their carers can be engaged in infection prevention and control (IPC) and antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) initiatives to manage AMR. To effectively participate in these initiatives, patients and carers need to understand general terms used in infection care. We explored awareness of commonly used infection-related terms among patients and carers in the surgical out-patient of a tertiary academic hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Self-administered paper survey distributed among out-patients from August to September 2022. Categorical variables were analysed using Chi squared test. Significance was set as p-value of < 0.05. Content analysis identified terms commonly used by patients when talking about infections.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 896 out of 1,269 respondents (response rate 70.6%), with a 1:3 male to female ratio were included. Most respondents were patients (75%), with a minimum of high school education (91.2%) and a surgical history (60.3%). <i>Surgical wound infection</i> was the most familiar term to participants. While many respondents had not heard of Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ( <i>MRSA</i>) (92.3%, n=754) or <i>antimicrobial resistance</i> (92.8%, n=755), significantly more were aware of the descriptions provided for these terms (13.7% and 33.0%, respectively; p<0.001). Participants considered <i>antibiotic resistance</i> to be a condition in which the body rejects, resists, or does not respond to antibiotics.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings show dissonance between patients' awareness of and healthcare workers' use of infection-care terms, highlighting the need for relatable and accessible terms in infection-care engagement initiatives. More than half of respondents acknowledged that patient engagement responsibility is everyone's, underscoring the need for contextually fit and relevant communication strategies to advance patient engagement and infection awareness.</p>","PeriodicalId":23677,"journal":{"name":"Wellcome Open Research","volume":"8 ","pages":"574"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11523555/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wellcome Open Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.20162.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: As healthcare recipients and individuals affected by antimicrobial resistance (AMR), patients and their carers can be engaged in infection prevention and control (IPC) and antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) initiatives to manage AMR. To effectively participate in these initiatives, patients and carers need to understand general terms used in infection care. We explored awareness of commonly used infection-related terms among patients and carers in the surgical out-patient of a tertiary academic hospital.

Methods: Self-administered paper survey distributed among out-patients from August to September 2022. Categorical variables were analysed using Chi squared test. Significance was set as p-value of < 0.05. Content analysis identified terms commonly used by patients when talking about infections.

Results: Overall, 896 out of 1,269 respondents (response rate 70.6%), with a 1:3 male to female ratio were included. Most respondents were patients (75%), with a minimum of high school education (91.2%) and a surgical history (60.3%). Surgical wound infection was the most familiar term to participants. While many respondents had not heard of Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ( MRSA) (92.3%, n=754) or antimicrobial resistance (92.8%, n=755), significantly more were aware of the descriptions provided for these terms (13.7% and 33.0%, respectively; p<0.001). Participants considered antibiotic resistance to be a condition in which the body rejects, resists, or does not respond to antibiotics.

Conclusions: Findings show dissonance between patients' awareness of and healthcare workers' use of infection-care terms, highlighting the need for relatable and accessible terms in infection-care engagement initiatives. More than half of respondents acknowledged that patient engagement responsibility is everyone's, underscoring the need for contextually fit and relevant communication strategies to advance patient engagement and infection awareness.

公共医疗机构门诊患者和护理人员对感染护理术语的认识:横断面调查。
背景:作为医疗保健对象和受抗菌药物耐药性(AMR)影响的个人,患者及其护理人员可以参与感染预防与控制(IPC)和抗菌药物管理(AMS)措施,以管理 AMR。为了有效参与这些活动,患者和护理者需要了解感染护理中使用的一般术语。我们探讨了一家三级学术医院外科门诊患者和护理人员对常用感染相关术语的认识:方法:2022 年 8 月至 9 月在门诊患者中发放自填式纸质调查问卷。分类变量采用卡方检验进行分析。显著性以 P 值小于 0.05 为标准。内容分析确定了患者在谈论感染时常用的术语:在 1,269 位受访者中,共有 896 位受访者(回复率为 70.6%),男女比例为 1:3。大多数受访者是病人(75%),至少受过高中教育(91.2%),有手术史(60.3%)。手术伤口感染是参与者最熟悉的术语。虽然许多受访者没有听说过耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)(92.3%,n=754)或抗生素耐药性(92.8%,n=755),但知道这些术语描述的受访者明显要多(分别为 13.7% 和 33.0%;泛抗生素耐药性是指机体对抗生素产生排斥、抵抗或无反应的情况:研究结果表明,患者对感染护理术语的认识与医护人员对感染护理术语的使用之间存在差异,这凸显了在感染护理参与活动中使用亲切易懂的术语的必要性。半数以上的受访者承认,患者参与是每个人的责任,这强调了需要根据具体情况制定相关的沟通策略,以提高患者参与度和感染意识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Wellcome Open Research
Wellcome Open Research Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (all)
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
426
审稿时长
1 weeks
期刊介绍: Wellcome Open Research publishes scholarly articles reporting any basic scientific, translational and clinical research that has been funded (or co-funded) by Wellcome. Each publication must have at least one author who has been, or still is, a recipient of a Wellcome grant. Articles must be original (not duplications). All research, including clinical trials, systematic reviews, software tools, method articles, and many others, is welcome and will be published irrespective of the perceived level of interest or novelty; confirmatory and negative results, as well as null studies are all suitable. See the full list of article types here. All articles are published using a fully transparent, author-driven model: the authors are solely responsible for the content of their article. Invited peer review takes place openly after publication, and the authors play a crucial role in ensuring that the article is peer-reviewed by independent experts in a timely manner. Articles that pass peer review will be indexed in PubMed and elsewhere. Wellcome Open Research is an Open Research platform: all articles are published open access; the publishing and peer-review processes are fully transparent; and authors are asked to include detailed descriptions of methods and to provide full and easy access to source data underlying the results to improve reproducibility.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信