Postpartum Screening for Type 2 Diabetes in Women With a History of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis in Singapore

IF 1.4 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Andrea Cremaschi PhD , Willem van den Boom PhD , Nicholas Beng Hui Ng MMed , Beatrice Franzolini PhD , Kelvin B. Tan PhD , Jerry Kok Yen Chan PhD , Kok Hian Tan MMed , Yap-Seng Chong MD , Johan G. Eriksson DMSc , Maria De Iorio PhD
{"title":"Postpartum Screening for Type 2 Diabetes in Women With a History of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis in Singapore","authors":"Andrea Cremaschi PhD ,&nbsp;Willem van den Boom PhD ,&nbsp;Nicholas Beng Hui Ng MMed ,&nbsp;Beatrice Franzolini PhD ,&nbsp;Kelvin B. Tan PhD ,&nbsp;Jerry Kok Yen Chan PhD ,&nbsp;Kok Hian Tan MMed ,&nbsp;Yap-Seng Chong MD ,&nbsp;Johan G. Eriksson DMSc ,&nbsp;Maria De Iorio PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.vhri.2024.101048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>In Singapore, diabetes imposes a huge population health and economic burden. Despite that, there is paucity of evidence on the health economics of screening programs for type 2 diabetes, especially in the context of screening after gestational diabetes (GDM). The objective of this study is to assess cost-effectiveness of universal lifelong screening for type 2 diabetes after GDM, which is supported by current guidelines, compared with elective screening where 54% of mothers with GDM undertake one-off screening. Despite the recommendation for universal lifelong screening, only 54% comply with this in the first postpartum year.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We perform a cost-effectiveness analysis comparing 5 screening strategies, accounting for lifetime costs to the healthcare system and quality of life for Singapore women diagnosed with GDM. In particular, a hybrid decision model, based on a decision tree and Markov models, is implemented to estimate cost and quality-adjusted life-years (QALY). Probabilities, costs, and utilities are obtained from existing literature, governmental databases, the Growing Up in Singapore Towards Healthy Outcomes birth cohort study, and the National University Hospital.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Compared with elective screening, universal annual screening reduces cost by SG$19.4 million while adding 3.8 thousand QALYs by each annual cohort of pregnant women. Furthermore, annual screening is cost-effective (lower cost and higher QALY) compared with triennial screening. Sensitivity analysis shows that the findings are robust to parameter specifications.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Universal annual screening of women with a history of GDM is cost-effective for reducing diabetes complications compared with strategies with less frequent screening in Singapore.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23497,"journal":{"name":"Value in health regional issues","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Value in health regional issues","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212109924000815","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

In Singapore, diabetes imposes a huge population health and economic burden. Despite that, there is paucity of evidence on the health economics of screening programs for type 2 diabetes, especially in the context of screening after gestational diabetes (GDM). The objective of this study is to assess cost-effectiveness of universal lifelong screening for type 2 diabetes after GDM, which is supported by current guidelines, compared with elective screening where 54% of mothers with GDM undertake one-off screening. Despite the recommendation for universal lifelong screening, only 54% comply with this in the first postpartum year.

Methods

We perform a cost-effectiveness analysis comparing 5 screening strategies, accounting for lifetime costs to the healthcare system and quality of life for Singapore women diagnosed with GDM. In particular, a hybrid decision model, based on a decision tree and Markov models, is implemented to estimate cost and quality-adjusted life-years (QALY). Probabilities, costs, and utilities are obtained from existing literature, governmental databases, the Growing Up in Singapore Towards Healthy Outcomes birth cohort study, and the National University Hospital.

Results

Compared with elective screening, universal annual screening reduces cost by SG$19.4 million while adding 3.8 thousand QALYs by each annual cohort of pregnant women. Furthermore, annual screening is cost-effective (lower cost and higher QALY) compared with triennial screening. Sensitivity analysis shows that the findings are robust to parameter specifications.

Conclusions

Universal annual screening of women with a history of GDM is cost-effective for reducing diabetes complications compared with strategies with less frequent screening in Singapore.
对有妊娠糖尿病史的妇女进行产后 2 型糖尿病筛查:新加坡的成本效益分析。
目标:在新加坡,糖尿病给人口健康和经济造成了巨大负担。尽管如此,有关 2 型糖尿病筛查计划的健康经济学证据却很少,尤其是在妊娠糖尿病(GDM)筛查方面。本研究的目的是评估 GDM 后 2 型糖尿病终生筛查与选择性筛查(54% 的 GDM 母亲接受一次性筛查)的成本效益,后者得到了现行指南的支持。尽管建议进行普遍的终身筛查,但在产后第一年只有 54% 的人遵守了这一建议:我们对 5 种筛查策略进行了成本效益分析比较,并考虑了医疗系统的终生成本以及被诊断为 GDM 的新加坡妇女的生活质量。特别是,我们采用了基于决策树和马尔可夫模型的混合决策模型来估算成本和质量调整生命年(QALY)。概率、成本和效用均来自现有文献、政府数据库、新加坡健康成长出生队列研究(Growing Up in Singapore Towards Healthy Outcomes birth cohort study)和国立大学医院:与选择性筛查相比,普及年度筛查可降低成本 1940 万新元,同时每年每批孕妇可增加 380 万个 QALY。此外,与三年一次的筛查相比,每年一次的筛查具有成本效益(成本更低,QALY更高)。敏感性分析表明,研究结果对参数规格具有稳健性:结论:在新加坡,与筛查频率较低的策略相比,每年对有 GDM 病史的妇女进行普遍筛查,对于减少糖尿病并发症具有成本效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Value in health regional issues
Value in health regional issues Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
127
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信