Supracostal ultrasound guided approach percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SUGA-PNL) versus retrograde intrarenal surgery for large volume isolated upper calyceal stones: a prospective randomized analysis.

IF 2 2区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Ahmed Assem, Ahmed Abdalla, Mohamed Elzoheiry, Islam Nasser Abd Elaziz, Hesham Amr, Heba Bakr, Ahmed M Rammah
{"title":"Supracostal ultrasound guided approach percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SUGA-PNL) versus retrograde intrarenal surgery for large volume isolated upper calyceal stones: a prospective randomized analysis.","authors":"Ahmed Assem, Ahmed Abdalla, Mohamed Elzoheiry, Islam Nasser Abd Elaziz, Hesham Amr, Heba Bakr, Ahmed M Rammah","doi":"10.1007/s00240-024-01637-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To assess outcomes of supracostal ultrasound guided approach percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SUGA-PNL) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) in isolated large volume upper calyceal stones (UCS). This was a prospective randomized study including patients with isolated UCS > 20mm. The patients were randomized into two groups: group (P) (SUGA-PNL) and group (R) (RIRS). Patients' demographics, stones characteristics, operative, and postoperative outcomes essentially the stone free rate (SFR) and complications rate were documented. The stone clearance was defined as no fragments or residual fragments less than 2mm in the one month non contrast CT scan follow up. Eighty-nine patients opted to undergo the procedure according to the preoperative randomization. Four patients, 2 patients from each group, lost to follow up and other 2 patients were excluded from group (R) due to a tight ureter. Both groups were comparable as regards the preoperative demographics and stone characteristics. There were statistically significant differences regarding total operative time, the change in hemoglobin level, and postoperative pain score (P: 0.024, 0.010 and 0.032 respectively). The SFR was 88.1% in group (P) compared to 73.2% in group (R) (P: 0.019). Moreover, it did not differ significantly between both groups regarding the intraoperative and postoperative complications. No visceral and thoracic injuries were documented in group (P). On other side, 6 patients (14.6%) from group (R) had different grades of ureteral injury during access sheath placement. SUGA-PNL is a safe and effective treatment modality for UCS > 20mm with a higher SFR than RIRS.</p>","PeriodicalId":23411,"journal":{"name":"Urolithiasis","volume":"52 1","pages":"154"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11522052/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urolithiasis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-024-01637-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To assess outcomes of supracostal ultrasound guided approach percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SUGA-PNL) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) in isolated large volume upper calyceal stones (UCS). This was a prospective randomized study including patients with isolated UCS > 20mm. The patients were randomized into two groups: group (P) (SUGA-PNL) and group (R) (RIRS). Patients' demographics, stones characteristics, operative, and postoperative outcomes essentially the stone free rate (SFR) and complications rate were documented. The stone clearance was defined as no fragments or residual fragments less than 2mm in the one month non contrast CT scan follow up. Eighty-nine patients opted to undergo the procedure according to the preoperative randomization. Four patients, 2 patients from each group, lost to follow up and other 2 patients were excluded from group (R) due to a tight ureter. Both groups were comparable as regards the preoperative demographics and stone characteristics. There were statistically significant differences regarding total operative time, the change in hemoglobin level, and postoperative pain score (P: 0.024, 0.010 and 0.032 respectively). The SFR was 88.1% in group (P) compared to 73.2% in group (R) (P: 0.019). Moreover, it did not differ significantly between both groups regarding the intraoperative and postoperative complications. No visceral and thoracic injuries were documented in group (P). On other side, 6 patients (14.6%) from group (R) had different grades of ureteral injury during access sheath placement. SUGA-PNL is a safe and effective treatment modality for UCS > 20mm with a higher SFR than RIRS.

经皮肾镜取石术(SUGA-PNL)与逆行肾内手术治疗大体积孤立性上肾盏结石:前瞻性随机分析。
目的:评估对孤立性大体积上肾盏结石(UCS)进行肋骨上超声引导下经皮肾镜碎石术(SUGA-PNL)和逆行肾内手术(RIRS)的效果。这是一项前瞻性随机研究,研究对象包括体积大于 20 毫米的孤立性上盏结石患者。患者被随机分为两组:P 组(SUGA-PNL)和 R 组(RIRS)。研究记录了患者的人口统计学特征、结石特征、手术和术后结果,主要是无结石率(SFR)和并发症发生率。结石清除率的定义是在一个月的非造影剂 CT 扫描随访中无碎石或残余碎石小于 2 毫米。89 名患者根据术前随机分组选择接受手术。四名患者(每组各两名)失去了随访机会,另外两名患者因输尿管过紧而被排除在(R)组之外。两组患者术前的人口统计学和结石特征具有可比性。两组患者的手术总时间、血红蛋白水平变化和术后疼痛评分差异有统计学意义(P分别为0.024、0.010和0.032)。P 组的 SFR 为 88.1%,而 R 组为 73.2%(P:0.019)。此外,两组在术中和术后并发症方面没有明显差异。P组没有内脏和胸部损伤的记录。另一方面,R 组有 6 名患者(14.6%)在放置入路鞘时造成不同程度的输尿管损伤。与 RIRS 相比,SUGA-PNL 是一种安全有效的治疗方法,适用于 20mm 以上的 UCS,且 SFR 更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Urolithiasis
Urolithiasis UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
6.50%
发文量
74
期刊介绍: Official Journal of the International Urolithiasis Society The journal aims to publish original articles in the fields of clinical and experimental investigation only within the sphere of urolithiasis and its related areas of research. The journal covers all aspects of urolithiasis research including the diagnosis, epidemiology, pathogenesis, genetics, clinical biochemistry, open and non-invasive surgical intervention, nephrological investigation, chemistry and prophylaxis of the disorder. The Editor welcomes contributions on topics of interest to urologists, nephrologists, radiologists, clinical biochemists, epidemiologists, nutritionists, basic scientists and nurses working in that field. Contributions may be submitted as full-length articles or as rapid communications in the form of Letters to the Editor. Articles should be original and should contain important new findings from carefully conducted studies designed to produce statistically significant data. Please note that we no longer publish articles classified as Case Reports. Editorials and review articles may be published by invitation from the Editorial Board. All submissions are peer-reviewed. Through an electronic system for the submission and review of manuscripts, the Editor and Associate Editors aim to make publication accessible as quickly as possible to a large number of readers throughout the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信