Association of gait speed and handgrip strength with falls in older adults: the role of cognition.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences Pub Date : 2024-06-17 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.55730/1300-0144.5882
Neslihan Kayahan Satiş, Sultan Keskin Demircan, Mehmet İlkin Naharci
{"title":"Association of gait speed and handgrip strength with falls in older adults: the role of cognition.","authors":"Neslihan Kayahan Satiş, Sultan Keskin Demircan, Mehmet İlkin Naharci","doi":"10.55730/1300-0144.5882","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aim: </strong>Fall risk assessment is crucial for older adults because falls are associated with morbidity and mortality. This study investigated the relationship of gait speed (GS) and handgrip strength (HGS) with falls and assessed whether cognition mediates this causality.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The study was conducted in a tertiary referral geriatric outpatient clinic. The physical performance of participants was evaluated by GS and HGS. All falls in the previous year were noted and factors associated with falls were analyzed using multivariate regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1018 older adults with a mean age of 78.8 ± 7.2 years, 64.2% of whom were female, were stratified into two groups: those who were cognitively impaired (n = 331) and those who were cognitively healthy (n = 660). In the study population, 22.8% (n = 226) had a history of falls in the previous year. The rates of low GS and HGS were 29.1% and 80.6%, respectively. After adjusting for confounding factors, low GS (OR = 2.01, 95% CI: 1.10-3.77, p = 0.019), low HGS (OR = 3.57, 95% CI: 1.10-11.35, p = 0.038), and low GS plus low HGS (OR = 4.52, 95% CI: 1.14-15.78, p = 0.024) in the cognitively impaired group and low GS (OR = 2.13, 95% CI: 1.39-3.52, p = 0.003) in the cognitively healthy group were independently associated with falls.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>GS is an efficient and practical assessment tool for identifying older adults at risk of falls regardless of their cognitive status.</p>","PeriodicalId":23361,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences","volume":"54 5","pages":"1033-1042"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11518331/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55730/1300-0144.5882","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/aim: Fall risk assessment is crucial for older adults because falls are associated with morbidity and mortality. This study investigated the relationship of gait speed (GS) and handgrip strength (HGS) with falls and assessed whether cognition mediates this causality.

Materials and methods: The study was conducted in a tertiary referral geriatric outpatient clinic. The physical performance of participants was evaluated by GS and HGS. All falls in the previous year were noted and factors associated with falls were analyzed using multivariate regression analysis.

Results: A total of 1018 older adults with a mean age of 78.8 ± 7.2 years, 64.2% of whom were female, were stratified into two groups: those who were cognitively impaired (n = 331) and those who were cognitively healthy (n = 660). In the study population, 22.8% (n = 226) had a history of falls in the previous year. The rates of low GS and HGS were 29.1% and 80.6%, respectively. After adjusting for confounding factors, low GS (OR = 2.01, 95% CI: 1.10-3.77, p = 0.019), low HGS (OR = 3.57, 95% CI: 1.10-11.35, p = 0.038), and low GS plus low HGS (OR = 4.52, 95% CI: 1.14-15.78, p = 0.024) in the cognitively impaired group and low GS (OR = 2.13, 95% CI: 1.39-3.52, p = 0.003) in the cognitively healthy group were independently associated with falls.

Conclusion: GS is an efficient and practical assessment tool for identifying older adults at risk of falls regardless of their cognitive status.

步速和握力与老年人跌倒的关系:认知的作用。
背景/目的:跌倒风险评估对老年人至关重要,因为跌倒与发病率和死亡率相关。本研究调查了步速(GS)和手握力(HGS)与跌倒之间的关系,并评估了认知是否能调节这种因果关系:研究在一家三级转诊老年病门诊进行。通过GS和HGS评估参与者的体能表现。研究人员记录了参与者在过去一年中的所有跌倒情况,并使用多变量回归分析法对与跌倒相关的因素进行了分析:研究人员将 1018 名平均年龄为 78.8 ± 7.2 岁的老年人分为两组:认知障碍组(331 人)和认知健康组(660 人),其中女性占 64.2%。在研究人群中,22.8%(n = 226)的人在前一年有过跌倒史。低GS和HGS的比例分别为29.1%和80.6%。调整混杂因素后,低 GS(OR = 2.01,95% CI:1.10-3.77,p = 0.019)、低 HGS(OR = 3.57,95% CI:1.10-11.35,p = 0.038)、低 GS 加低 HGS(OR = 4.52,95% CI:1.14-15.78, p = 0.024)和认知健康组的低 GS(OR = 2.13, 95% CI: 1.39-3.52, p = 0.003)与跌倒独立相关:无论老年人的认知状况如何,GS 都是一种高效实用的评估工具,可用于识别有跌倒风险的老年人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences
Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.30%
发文量
143
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Turkish Journal of Medical sciences is a peer-reviewed comprehensive resource that provides critical up-to-date information on the broad spectrum of general medical sciences. The Journal intended to publish original medical scientific papers regarding the priority based on the prominence, significance, and timeliness of the findings. However since the audience of the Journal is not limited to any subspeciality in a wide variety of medical disciplines, the papers focusing on the technical  details of a given medical  subspeciality may not be evaluated for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信