Federico Camicia , Rocío I. Miguez , Néstor R. Lago , Carlos F. Damin , Adolfo R. de Roodt
{"title":"A simple method to determine proteolytic activity of snake venoms","authors":"Federico Camicia , Rocío I. Miguez , Néstor R. Lago , Carlos F. Damin , Adolfo R. de Roodt","doi":"10.1016/j.toxicon.2024.108157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In this work, we describe an easy, simple, and cost-effective method to assess the proteolytic activity of snake venoms. The method is based on measuring the hydrolytic halo formed by gelatin radial hydrolysis following the incubation of venoms on a solid gelatin-agarose plate. Venoms from <em>Bothrops (B.) alternatus</em>, <em>B. diporus</em>, <em>B. neuwiedi</em>, <em>B. jararaca</em>, <em>B. jararacussu</em>, <em>Crotalus atrox,</em> and <em>Trimeresurus albolabris</em> were tested. A dose-response relationship was observed for each venom tested, with proteolytic capacity values, determined as GD (gelatinolytic dose, the dose causing a 15 mm hydrolytic halo) ranging from 21 to 222 μg. A correlation between hydrolysis and hemorrhagic activity in rat skin (minimal hemorrhagic dose) was found, with an r<sup>2</sup> value of 0.8774 (p < 0.0001). The venoms’ hydrolytic activity was significantly, though not completely, inhibited by EDTA. This methodology was also deployed to assess venom neutralization by antivenoms on the hydrolytic activity of the different venoms, demonstrating its usefulness in evaluating antivenom neutralizing capacity. The method presented is simple, cheap and useful for preliminary screening of venom proteolytic activity and its inhibition and may also predict gross differences in hemorrhagic activity, contributing to the reduction of the number of animals used for these determinations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23289,"journal":{"name":"Toxicon","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Toxicon","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0041010124007293","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In this work, we describe an easy, simple, and cost-effective method to assess the proteolytic activity of snake venoms. The method is based on measuring the hydrolytic halo formed by gelatin radial hydrolysis following the incubation of venoms on a solid gelatin-agarose plate. Venoms from Bothrops (B.) alternatus, B. diporus, B. neuwiedi, B. jararaca, B. jararacussu, Crotalus atrox, and Trimeresurus albolabris were tested. A dose-response relationship was observed for each venom tested, with proteolytic capacity values, determined as GD (gelatinolytic dose, the dose causing a 15 mm hydrolytic halo) ranging from 21 to 222 μg. A correlation between hydrolysis and hemorrhagic activity in rat skin (minimal hemorrhagic dose) was found, with an r2 value of 0.8774 (p < 0.0001). The venoms’ hydrolytic activity was significantly, though not completely, inhibited by EDTA. This methodology was also deployed to assess venom neutralization by antivenoms on the hydrolytic activity of the different venoms, demonstrating its usefulness in evaluating antivenom neutralizing capacity. The method presented is simple, cheap and useful for preliminary screening of venom proteolytic activity and its inhibition and may also predict gross differences in hemorrhagic activity, contributing to the reduction of the number of animals used for these determinations.
期刊介绍:
Toxicon has an open access mirror Toxicon: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review. An introductory offer Toxicon: X - full waiver of the Open Access fee.
Toxicon''s "aims and scope" are to publish:
-articles containing the results of original research on problems related to toxins derived from animals, plants and microorganisms
-papers on novel findings related to the chemical, pharmacological, toxicological, and immunological properties of natural toxins
-molecular biological studies of toxins and other genes from poisonous and venomous organisms that advance understanding of the role or function of toxins
-clinical observations on poisoning and envenoming where a new therapeutic principle has been proposed or a decidedly superior clinical result has been obtained.
-material on the use of toxins as tools in studying biological processes and material on subjects related to venom and antivenom problems.
-articles on the translational application of toxins, for example as drugs and insecticides
-epidemiological studies on envenoming or poisoning, so long as they highlight a previously unrecognised medical problem or provide insight into the prevention or medical treatment of envenoming or poisoning. Retrospective surveys of hospital records, especially those lacking species identification, will not be considered for publication. Properly designed prospective community-based surveys are strongly encouraged.
-articles describing well-known activities of venoms, such as antibacterial, anticancer, and analgesic activities of arachnid venoms, without any attempt to define the mechanism of action or purify the active component, will not be considered for publication in Toxicon.
-review articles on problems related to toxinology.
To encourage the exchange of ideas, sections of the journal may be devoted to Short Communications, Letters to the Editor and activities of the affiliated societies.