A Biomechanical Analysis of Instrumentation Constructs During Vertebral Column Resection: Stability When You Need It!

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Spine Pub Date : 2024-10-30 DOI:10.1097/BRS.0000000000005198
K Aaron Shaw, Brad Niese, Daniel J Sucato
{"title":"A Biomechanical Analysis of Instrumentation Constructs During Vertebral Column Resection: Stability When You Need It!","authors":"K Aaron Shaw, Brad Niese, Daniel J Sucato","doi":"10.1097/BRS.0000000000005198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Biomechanical Testing.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Investigate the optimal construct for stabilization of the spine during vertebral column resection (VCR).</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>VCR is a powerful technique for achieving correction in severe cases of spinal deformity. However, this also creates an unstable spine which requires stable fixation to prevent iatrogenic neurologic injury. It is common practice to place a temporary unilateral rod configuration to achieve this stability during surgery but no study to date has investigated the optimal construct configuration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A unilateral VCR model representing an acute 50° kyphotic deformity with a standardized 30 mm resection was created. Three conditions underwent testing: 1) Rod material and diameter, 2) rod configuration, and 3) number of fixation points. Six unique samples were tested in each group in both flexion-extension. Prior to testing a 10N preload and underwent cyclical testing in flexion/extension. System stiffness was calculated and compared across groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Assessment of rod size and composition using a single screw construct (2 total screws) demonstrated that for Titanium (Ti) rods, increasing rod size significantly increased the construct stiffness (P=0.001). Although Cobalt-chromium (Co-Cr) rods where significantly stiffer than the corresponding sized Ti rods, there was no significant difference between rod diameters for Co-Cr (P=0.98). However, when tested using a dual screw (4 total screws) construct, these constructs were significantly stiffer than the corresponding single screw constructs (P<0.0001). Of the various rod configurations, the dual rod demonstrated the greatest stiffness (34.8±2.1 N/mm; P<0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Surgical construct stiffness during a VCR is multifactorial. Larger rod diameter, increased number of fixation points, stiffer rod material, and increased number of rods across the resection site increase the construct stiffness. With minimal points of fixation using Co-Cr rods, increasing rod diameter does not impart greater construct stiffness unless additional fixation points are included.</p>","PeriodicalId":22193,"journal":{"name":"Spine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000005198","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study design: Biomechanical Testing.

Objective: Investigate the optimal construct for stabilization of the spine during vertebral column resection (VCR).

Summary of background data: VCR is a powerful technique for achieving correction in severe cases of spinal deformity. However, this also creates an unstable spine which requires stable fixation to prevent iatrogenic neurologic injury. It is common practice to place a temporary unilateral rod configuration to achieve this stability during surgery but no study to date has investigated the optimal construct configuration.

Methods: A unilateral VCR model representing an acute 50° kyphotic deformity with a standardized 30 mm resection was created. Three conditions underwent testing: 1) Rod material and diameter, 2) rod configuration, and 3) number of fixation points. Six unique samples were tested in each group in both flexion-extension. Prior to testing a 10N preload and underwent cyclical testing in flexion/extension. System stiffness was calculated and compared across groups.

Results: Assessment of rod size and composition using a single screw construct (2 total screws) demonstrated that for Titanium (Ti) rods, increasing rod size significantly increased the construct stiffness (P=0.001). Although Cobalt-chromium (Co-Cr) rods where significantly stiffer than the corresponding sized Ti rods, there was no significant difference between rod diameters for Co-Cr (P=0.98). However, when tested using a dual screw (4 total screws) construct, these constructs were significantly stiffer than the corresponding single screw constructs (P<0.0001). Of the various rod configurations, the dual rod demonstrated the greatest stiffness (34.8±2.1 N/mm; P<0.0001).

Conclusion: Surgical construct stiffness during a VCR is multifactorial. Larger rod diameter, increased number of fixation points, stiffer rod material, and increased number of rods across the resection site increase the construct stiffness. With minimal points of fixation using Co-Cr rods, increasing rod diameter does not impart greater construct stiffness unless additional fixation points are included.

椎体柱切除术中器械结构的生物力学分析:需要时的稳定性
研究设计生物力学测试:调查椎体柱切除术(VCR)中稳定脊柱的最佳结构:椎体柱切除术是对严重脊柱畸形病例进行矫正的一种强有力的技术。然而,这也会造成脊柱不稳定,需要稳定的固定以防止先天性神经损伤。通常的做法是在手术过程中放置一个临时的单侧杆配置来实现这种稳定性,但迄今为止还没有研究调查过最佳的构造配置:方法:创建了一个单侧 VCR 模型,该模型代表急性 50° 脊柱畸形,并进行了 30 毫米的标准化切除。对三种情况进行了测试:1)杆材料和直径;2)杆配置;3)固定点数量。每组有六个不同的样本进行了屈伸测试。测试前进行 10N 预载,并在屈伸状态下进行循环测试。计算系统刚度并在各组间进行比较:结果:使用单螺钉结构(共 2 个螺钉)对杆的尺寸和组成进行的评估表明,对于钛(Ti)杆而言,增加杆的尺寸可显著提高结构的硬度(P=0.001)。虽然钴铬(Co-Cr)棒的硬度明显高于相应尺寸的钛棒,但钴铬棒直径之间没有明显差异(P=0.98)。然而,在使用双螺钉(共 4 个螺钉)结构进行测试时,这些结构的硬度明显高于相应的单螺钉结构(PC 结论:VCR 期间手术结构的硬度是多因素造成的。更大的杆直径、更多的固定点、更硬的杆材料以及切除部位更多的杆数量都会增加结构的硬度。在使用钴铬合金杆固定点最少的情况下,除非增加固定点,否则增加杆直径并不会增加构造的硬度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Spine
Spine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
361
审稿时长
6.0 months
期刊介绍: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins is a leading international publisher of professional health information for physicians, nurses, specialized clinicians and students. For a complete listing of titles currently published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and detailed information about print, online, and other offerings, please visit the LWW Online Store. Recognized internationally as the leading journal in its field, Spine is an international, peer-reviewed, bi-weekly periodical that considers for publication original articles in the field of Spine. It is the leading subspecialty journal for the treatment of spinal disorders. Only original papers are considered for publication with the understanding that they are contributed solely to Spine. The Journal does not publish articles reporting material that has been reported at length elsewhere.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信