Sex Differences in the Pre- and In-Hospital Setting of Patients With Stroke Are Driven by Higher Age and Stroke Severity.

IF 7.8 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Stroke Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-31 DOI:10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.048303
Laura P Westphal, Lilian Rüttener, Tim Gasser, Andreas R Luft, Ulrike Held, Susanne Wegener
{"title":"Sex Differences in the Pre- and In-Hospital Setting of Patients With Stroke Are Driven by Higher Age and Stroke Severity.","authors":"Laura P Westphal, Lilian Rüttener, Tim Gasser, Andreas R Luft, Ulrike Held, Susanne Wegener","doi":"10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.048303","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sex critically determines stroke pathophysiology and recovery. To reveal potential gaps in stroke care, we analyzed sex-specific differences in the stroke patient hospital admission and treatment process.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this single-center retrospective analysis, we screened all patients referred to our stroke center between 2014 and 2020 with suspicion of stroke (n=7112). Patients with different cerebrovascular events and stroke mimics were included. We collected demographic hospitalization and 90-day follow-up data and stratified results according to sex. In a logistic regression analysis for 90-day functional outcome, we estimated the effect of sex corrected for the clinically most relevant confounders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 7102 patients, 56.7% were male and 43.3% female. Women were older (median, 76.3 years; interquartile range (IQR), 64-84, versus 70.7; IQR, 59-79; <i>P</i><0.001), and lived more often in nursing homes before the event (10.5% versus 3.8%; <i>P</i><0.001). Among patients with acute ischemic stroke (n=4515), women had more often a large vessel occlusion (38.6% versus 34.8%; <i>P</i>=0.015), a higher stroke severity (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, 4; IQR, 1-12 versus 3; IQR, 1-8; <i>P</i><0.001), and were treated more often with endovascular treatment (21.4% versus 17.3%; <i>P</i>=0.001). Onset-to-door, onset-to-treatment, and door-to-treatment times were significantly longer in women. A favorable 90-day functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale score 0-2) occurred more often in men (73.9% versus 64.9%; <i>P</i><0.001). When correcting for confounders in a multivariable logistic regression, age, admission National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, and prestroke modified Rankin Scale remained highly (<i>P</i><0.001), large vessel occlusion and arterial hypertension moderately significant predictors for 90-day functional outcome (<i>P</i><0.05), whereas female sex was not. This could be confirmed when analyzing different patient age groups separately in multivariable logistic regression subgroup analyses. An interaction-term analysis revealed no additional association between age and female sex (OR, 0.99; <i>P</i>=0.815).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although treatment and outcome parameters seem to be in favor of men, most can be explained by older age, poorer prestroke independence, higher stroke severity, and more large vessel occlusion in women. Sex was not independently associated with worse 90-day functional outcome in women.</p>","PeriodicalId":21989,"journal":{"name":"Stroke","volume":" ","pages":"256-264"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stroke","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.048303","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Sex critically determines stroke pathophysiology and recovery. To reveal potential gaps in stroke care, we analyzed sex-specific differences in the stroke patient hospital admission and treatment process.

Methods: In this single-center retrospective analysis, we screened all patients referred to our stroke center between 2014 and 2020 with suspicion of stroke (n=7112). Patients with different cerebrovascular events and stroke mimics were included. We collected demographic hospitalization and 90-day follow-up data and stratified results according to sex. In a logistic regression analysis for 90-day functional outcome, we estimated the effect of sex corrected for the clinically most relevant confounders.

Results: Of 7102 patients, 56.7% were male and 43.3% female. Women were older (median, 76.3 years; interquartile range (IQR), 64-84, versus 70.7; IQR, 59-79; P<0.001), and lived more often in nursing homes before the event (10.5% versus 3.8%; P<0.001). Among patients with acute ischemic stroke (n=4515), women had more often a large vessel occlusion (38.6% versus 34.8%; P=0.015), a higher stroke severity (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, 4; IQR, 1-12 versus 3; IQR, 1-8; P<0.001), and were treated more often with endovascular treatment (21.4% versus 17.3%; P=0.001). Onset-to-door, onset-to-treatment, and door-to-treatment times were significantly longer in women. A favorable 90-day functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale score 0-2) occurred more often in men (73.9% versus 64.9%; P<0.001). When correcting for confounders in a multivariable logistic regression, age, admission National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, and prestroke modified Rankin Scale remained highly (P<0.001), large vessel occlusion and arterial hypertension moderately significant predictors for 90-day functional outcome (P<0.05), whereas female sex was not. This could be confirmed when analyzing different patient age groups separately in multivariable logistic regression subgroup analyses. An interaction-term analysis revealed no additional association between age and female sex (OR, 0.99; P=0.815).

Conclusions: Although treatment and outcome parameters seem to be in favor of men, most can be explained by older age, poorer prestroke independence, higher stroke severity, and more large vessel occlusion in women. Sex was not independently associated with worse 90-day functional outcome in women.

年龄越大、中风严重程度越高,中风患者住院前和住院期间的性别差异越大。
背景:性别对中风的病理生理学和康复起着至关重要的作用。为了揭示卒中治疗中的潜在差距,我们分析了卒中患者入院和治疗过程中的性别差异:在这项单中心回顾性分析中,我们筛查了 2014 年至 2020 年期间转诊至卒中中心的所有疑似卒中患者(n=7112)。其中包括不同脑血管事件和卒中模拟患者。我们收集了住院和 90 天随访的人口统计学数据,并根据性别对结果进行了分层。在针对 90 天功能结果的逻辑回归分析中,我们估计了性别对临床上最相关的混杂因素的影响:7102名患者中,56.7%为男性,43.3%为女性。女性年龄更大(中位数为 76.3 岁;四分位间距(IQR)为 64-84 岁;女性为 70.7 岁;IQR 为 59-79 岁;PPP=0.015),中风严重程度更高(美国国立卫生研究院中风量表评分为 4 分;IQR 为 1-12 分;女性为 3 分;IQR 为 1-8 分;PP=0.001)。女性患者从发病到入院、从发病到接受治疗以及从入院到接受治疗的时间明显更长。男性获得良好的90天功能结果(改良Rankin量表评分0-2)的比例更高(73.9%对64.9%;PPPP=0.815):尽管治疗和结果参数似乎对男性更有利,但大部分原因是女性年龄更大、卒中前独立性更差、卒中严重程度更高以及大血管闭塞更多。性别与女性较差的 90 天功能预后无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Stroke
Stroke 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
13.40
自引率
6.00%
发文量
2021
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Stroke is a monthly publication that collates reports of clinical and basic investigation of any aspect of the cerebral circulation and its diseases. The publication covers a wide range of disciplines including anesthesiology, critical care medicine, epidemiology, internal medicine, neurology, neuro-ophthalmology, neuropathology, neuropsychology, neurosurgery, nuclear medicine, nursing, radiology, rehabilitation, speech pathology, vascular physiology, and vascular surgery. The audience of Stroke includes neurologists, basic scientists, cardiologists, vascular surgeons, internists, interventionalists, neurosurgeons, nurses, and physiatrists. Stroke is indexed in Biological Abstracts, BIOSIS, CAB Abstracts, Chemical Abstracts, CINAHL, Current Contents, Embase, MEDLINE, and Science Citation Index Expanded.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信