Can the subjective perception of trauma effectively differentiate between International Classification of Diseases-11 PTSD and complex PTSD? The 2022 Russian invasion analysis.
{"title":"Can the subjective perception of trauma effectively differentiate between International Classification of Diseases-11 PTSD and complex PTSD? The 2022 Russian invasion analysis.","authors":"Shir Mor-Ben-Ishai, Yaira Hamama-Raz, Elazar Leshem, Menachem Ben-Ezra, Yafit Levin","doi":"10.1037/tra0001801","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study is aimed to test the association of the Subjective Traumatic Outlook (STO) concept for distinguishing between posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and complex PTSD. Focusing on identity dimensions within identity theory, the research aims to understand how subjective factors influence psychological outcomes, especially in the context of trauma during prolonged war. Findings can inform our understanding of the perception of trauma during wartime.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We examined a national sample of 1,895 Ukrainians during the Russian invasion, who completed the International Trauma Questionnaire and the STO. Statistical analyses, including analysis of variance, analysis of covariance, and contrast measurement, were conducted to examine associations while controlling for demographic factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our study highlights distinct STO levels associated with varying degrees of trauma-related disorders. Lower STO scores relate to reduced disorder likelihood, while higher STO levels indicate greater risk, particularly for complex PTSD. These distinctions persist even when considering demographic variables associated with wartime conditions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our research contributes to the understanding of PTSD/complex PTSD during ongoing conflict and underscores the applicability of identity aspects in elucidating the influence of subjective factors on psychological outcomes. This exploration of STO represents another approach to understanding internal perspectives in trauma-related disorders. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20982,"journal":{"name":"Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0001801","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: This study is aimed to test the association of the Subjective Traumatic Outlook (STO) concept for distinguishing between posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and complex PTSD. Focusing on identity dimensions within identity theory, the research aims to understand how subjective factors influence psychological outcomes, especially in the context of trauma during prolonged war. Findings can inform our understanding of the perception of trauma during wartime.
Method: We examined a national sample of 1,895 Ukrainians during the Russian invasion, who completed the International Trauma Questionnaire and the STO. Statistical analyses, including analysis of variance, analysis of covariance, and contrast measurement, were conducted to examine associations while controlling for demographic factors.
Results: Our study highlights distinct STO levels associated with varying degrees of trauma-related disorders. Lower STO scores relate to reduced disorder likelihood, while higher STO levels indicate greater risk, particularly for complex PTSD. These distinctions persist even when considering demographic variables associated with wartime conditions.
Conclusion: Our research contributes to the understanding of PTSD/complex PTSD during ongoing conflict and underscores the applicability of identity aspects in elucidating the influence of subjective factors on psychological outcomes. This exploration of STO represents another approach to understanding internal perspectives in trauma-related disorders. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
研究目的本研究旨在检验主观创伤前景(STO)概念与区分创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)和复杂创伤后应激障碍的关联性。研究以身份理论中的身份维度为重点,旨在了解主观因素如何影响心理结果,尤其是在长期战争的创伤背景下。研究结果可以帮助我们理解战时对创伤的认知:我们对俄罗斯入侵期间的 1895 名乌克兰人进行了全国抽样调查,他们填写了国际创伤问卷和 STO。在控制人口统计学因素的同时,我们还进行了统计分析,包括方差分析、协方差分析和对比测量,以研究相关性:结果:我们的研究强调了与不同程度的创伤相关失调相关的不同 STO 水平。较低的 STO 分数与失调可能性降低有关,而较高的 STO 水平则表明风险更大,尤其是对复杂创伤后应激障碍而言。即使考虑到与战时状况相关的人口统计学变量,这些区别仍然存在:我们的研究有助于人们了解持续冲突期间的创伤后应激障碍/复杂性创伤后应激障碍,并强调了身份认同在阐明主观因素对心理结果的影响方面的适用性。对STO的探索代表了理解创伤相关疾病内部视角的另一种方法。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,保留所有权利)。
期刊介绍:
Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy publishes empirical research on the psychological effects of trauma. The journal is intended to be a forum for an interdisciplinary discussion on trauma, blending science, theory, practice, and policy.
The journal publishes empirical research on a wide range of trauma-related topics, including:
-Psychological treatments and effects
-Promotion of education about effects of and treatment for trauma
-Assessment and diagnosis of trauma
-Pathophysiology of trauma reactions
-Health services (delivery of services to trauma populations)
-Epidemiological studies and risk factor studies
-Neuroimaging studies
-Trauma and cultural competence