The efficacy of partial versus total splenectomy in the treatment of hereditary spherocytosis in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 1.5 3区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Xilong Tang, Jianjin Xue, Jie Zhang, Jiajia Zhou
{"title":"The efficacy of partial versus total splenectomy in the treatment of hereditary spherocytosis in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Xilong Tang, Jianjin Xue, Jie Zhang, Jiajia Zhou","doi":"10.1007/s00383-024-05879-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the comparative postoperative efficacy of partial splenectomy (PS) and total splenectomy (TS) in the treatment of children with hereditary spherocytosis (HS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The relevant HS studies from databases were searched and screened, comparing the differences in hemoglobin concentration, reticulocyte percentage, bilirubin concentration before and after TS and PS surgery, and during the follow-up period, as well as the incidence of postoperative adverse events. Statistical analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.4.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 5 studies were included in this meta-analysis, with a cumulative enrollment of 312 children, 130 in the PS group and 182 in the TS group. The meta-analysis results showed that both PS and TS groups had statistically significant differences in postoperative hematological outcomes compared to before surgery, with TS showing better improvement than PS. In the postoperative follow-up, the changes in hematological outcomes between PS and TS were statistically significant for hemoglobin concentration: within 1 year [MD = 1.85, 95%CI(1.09,2.60)], 1-2 years [MD = 1.74, 95%CI(0.25,3.24)], not statistically significant for 4-6 years [MD = 1.28, 95%CI(-1.75,4.32)]; for reticulocyte percentage: within 1 year [MD = 2.23, 95%CI(0.80,3.66)] was statistically significant, not statistically significant for 4-6 years [MD = 1.77, 95%CI(-2.04,5.59)]; for serum bilirubin concentration: within 1 year [MD = 1.55, 95%CI(0.91,2.18)] was statistically significant, not statistically significant for 1-2 years [MD = 1.77, 95%CI(-2.04,5.99)]. In the incidence of postoperative adverse events, the incidence of cholelithiasis [MD = 1.77, 95%CI(-2.04,5.99)] showed a statistically significant difference between PS and TS, while there were no statistically significant differences in other included events, such as postoperative infection rate, secondary surgery rate, thrombosis rate, postoperative hemorrhage rate, and transfusion therapy rate.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Splenectomy is a beneficial surgical strategy for children with moderate-to-severe HS, reducing; early hematological outcomes of TS are more robust than PS in the follow-up period, and there is no difference between the two in the later period; for postoperative adverse events, the incidence of cholelithiasis in children after PS is higher than after TS, and there is a risk of requiring a second surgery for total splenectomy due to hemolytic recurrences.</p>","PeriodicalId":19832,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Surgery International","volume":"40 1","pages":"280"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Surgery International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-024-05879-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To explore the comparative postoperative efficacy of partial splenectomy (PS) and total splenectomy (TS) in the treatment of children with hereditary spherocytosis (HS).

Methods: The relevant HS studies from databases were searched and screened, comparing the differences in hemoglobin concentration, reticulocyte percentage, bilirubin concentration before and after TS and PS surgery, and during the follow-up period, as well as the incidence of postoperative adverse events. Statistical analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.4.

Results: A total of 5 studies were included in this meta-analysis, with a cumulative enrollment of 312 children, 130 in the PS group and 182 in the TS group. The meta-analysis results showed that both PS and TS groups had statistically significant differences in postoperative hematological outcomes compared to before surgery, with TS showing better improvement than PS. In the postoperative follow-up, the changes in hematological outcomes between PS and TS were statistically significant for hemoglobin concentration: within 1 year [MD = 1.85, 95%CI(1.09,2.60)], 1-2 years [MD = 1.74, 95%CI(0.25,3.24)], not statistically significant for 4-6 years [MD = 1.28, 95%CI(-1.75,4.32)]; for reticulocyte percentage: within 1 year [MD = 2.23, 95%CI(0.80,3.66)] was statistically significant, not statistically significant for 4-6 years [MD = 1.77, 95%CI(-2.04,5.59)]; for serum bilirubin concentration: within 1 year [MD = 1.55, 95%CI(0.91,2.18)] was statistically significant, not statistically significant for 1-2 years [MD = 1.77, 95%CI(-2.04,5.99)]. In the incidence of postoperative adverse events, the incidence of cholelithiasis [MD = 1.77, 95%CI(-2.04,5.99)] showed a statistically significant difference between PS and TS, while there were no statistically significant differences in other included events, such as postoperative infection rate, secondary surgery rate, thrombosis rate, postoperative hemorrhage rate, and transfusion therapy rate.

Conclusion: Splenectomy is a beneficial surgical strategy for children with moderate-to-severe HS, reducing; early hematological outcomes of TS are more robust than PS in the follow-up period, and there is no difference between the two in the later period; for postoperative adverse events, the incidence of cholelithiasis in children after PS is higher than after TS, and there is a risk of requiring a second surgery for total splenectomy due to hemolytic recurrences.

治疗儿童遗传性球形红细胞增多症的部分脾切除术与全脾切除术的疗效:系统综述和荟萃分析。
目的探讨脾部分切除术(PS)和全脾切除术(TS)治疗遗传性球形红细胞增多症(HS)患儿的术后疗效比较:方法:检索并筛选数据库中相关的 HS 研究,比较 TS 和 PS 手术前后和随访期间血红蛋白浓度、网状细胞百分比、胆红素浓度的差异,以及术后不良反应的发生率。统计分析使用Review Manager 5.4进行:本次荟萃分析共纳入了 5 项研究,累计入选患儿 312 名,其中 PS 组 130 名,TS 组 182 名。荟萃分析结果显示,PS组和TS组的术后血液学结果与术前相比均有显著统计学差异,其中TS组的改善效果优于PS组。在术后随访中,PS组和TS组血液学结果的变化在血红蛋白浓度方面有统计学意义:1年内[MD = 1.85,95%CI(1.09,2.60)],1-2年内[MD = 1.74,95%CI(0.25,3.24)],4-6年内[MD = 1.28,95%CI(-1.75,4.32)]无统计学意义;网织红细胞百分比方面:1年内[MD = 2.23,95%CI(0.80,3.66)]有统计学意义,4-6 年[MD = 1.77,95%CI(-2.04,5.59)]无统计学意义;血清胆红素浓度:1 年内[MD = 1.55,95%CI(0.91,2.18)]有统计学意义,1-2 年[MD = 1.77,95%CI(-2.04,5.99)]无统计学意义。在术后不良事件的发生率方面,PS和TS的胆石症发生率[MD = 1.77,95%CI(-2.04,5.99)]差异有统计学意义,而术后感染率、二次手术率、血栓形成率、术后出血率和输血治疗率等其他不良事件的发生率差异无统计学意义:结论:脾切除术是一种有益于中重度HS患儿的手术策略,可减少;在随访期间,TS的早期血液学结果比PS更稳健,二者在后期没有差异;在术后不良事件方面,PS术后患儿胆石症的发生率高于TS术后,且存在因溶血复发而需要二次手术进行全脾切除的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
215
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Surgery International is a journal devoted to the publication of new and important information from the entire spectrum of pediatric surgery. The major purpose of the journal is to promote postgraduate training and further education in the surgery of infants and children. The contents will include articles in clinical and experimental surgery, as well as related fields. One section of each issue is devoted to a special topic, with invited contributions from recognized authorities. Other sections will include: -Review articles- Original articles- Technical innovations- Letters to the editor
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信