Angular Insertion Depth in Inner Ear Malformations, Relationship to Cochlear Size, and Implications for Electrode Selection.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Otology & Neurotology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-28 DOI:10.1097/MAO.0000000000004357
Burçay Tellioğlu, Levent Sennaroğlu
{"title":"Angular Insertion Depth in Inner Ear Malformations, Relationship to Cochlear Size, and Implications for Electrode Selection.","authors":"Burçay Tellioğlu, Levent Sennaroğlu","doi":"10.1097/MAO.0000000000004357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objectives were to determine the interrater agreement of the Skull AP X-ray in measuring angular insertion depth (AID), to provide descriptive information about the insertion depths of different electrodes used in inner ear malformations (IEMs), to investigate the effect of cochlear size and electrode length on AID, and to guide clinicians in electrode selection in IEMs.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective case review.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Tertiary referral center.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>A total of 198 IEMs (n = 169 patients) and 60 cochleae with normal anatomy (n = 60 patients) were selected from patients with severe mixed or sensorineural hearing loss who presented to our clinic and underwent cochlear implantation (CI) between January 2010 and December 2022.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Three neurotologists independently measured AID on Skull AP X-rays. Basal turn length of the cochlea was measured in axial and coronal oblique reformatted sections on HRCT images.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Interrater reliability (ICC) of the AID measurements on Skull AP X-ray, determining the impact of cochlea size and electrode length on AID measurements.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The interrater reliability (ICC) test showed a high level of consistency in measuring AID in the Skull AP X-ray ( R = 0.906, p < 0.001). In the control group, a negative correlation was observed between the AID and the basal turn length of the cochlea, while a positive correlation was found between electrode length and AID ( R = 0.947, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Skull AP X-ray appears to be a dependable tool for measuring AID. In cases of IEMs, it is important to select an electrode of appropriate length, considering the dimensions of the cochlea.</p>","PeriodicalId":19732,"journal":{"name":"Otology & Neurotology","volume":" ","pages":"e9-e16"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otology & Neurotology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000004357","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The objectives were to determine the interrater agreement of the Skull AP X-ray in measuring angular insertion depth (AID), to provide descriptive information about the insertion depths of different electrodes used in inner ear malformations (IEMs), to investigate the effect of cochlear size and electrode length on AID, and to guide clinicians in electrode selection in IEMs.

Study design: Retrospective case review.

Setting: Tertiary referral center.

Patients: A total of 198 IEMs (n = 169 patients) and 60 cochleae with normal anatomy (n = 60 patients) were selected from patients with severe mixed or sensorineural hearing loss who presented to our clinic and underwent cochlear implantation (CI) between January 2010 and December 2022.

Interventions: Three neurotologists independently measured AID on Skull AP X-rays. Basal turn length of the cochlea was measured in axial and coronal oblique reformatted sections on HRCT images.

Main outcome measures: Interrater reliability (ICC) of the AID measurements on Skull AP X-ray, determining the impact of cochlea size and electrode length on AID measurements.

Results: The interrater reliability (ICC) test showed a high level of consistency in measuring AID in the Skull AP X-ray ( R = 0.906, p < 0.001). In the control group, a negative correlation was observed between the AID and the basal turn length of the cochlea, while a positive correlation was found between electrode length and AID ( R = 0.947, p < 0.001).

Conclusions: The Skull AP X-ray appears to be a dependable tool for measuring AID. In cases of IEMs, it is important to select an electrode of appropriate length, considering the dimensions of the cochlea.

内耳畸形的角度插入深度、与耳蜗大小的关系以及对电极选择的影响。
目的研究目的:确定颅骨AP X光片在测量角度插入深度(AID)方面的交互一致性,提供有关内耳畸形(IEM)中使用的不同电极插入深度的描述性信息,研究耳蜗大小和电极长度对AID的影响,并指导临床医生在内耳畸形中选择电极:研究地点:三级转诊中心研究地点:三级转诊中心:从 2010 年 1 月至 2022 年 12 月期间在本诊所就诊并接受人工耳蜗植入术(CI)的严重混合性或感音神经性听力损失患者中挑选出 198 例 IEM(n = 169 例患者)和 60 例具有正常解剖结构的耳蜗(n = 60 例患者):三位神经科医生在颅骨 AP X 光片上独立测量 AID。主要结果测量:主要结果测量:颅骨 AP X 光片上 AID 测量的互测可靠性(ICC),确定耳蜗大小和电极长度对 AID 测量的影响:测量者间可靠性(ICC)测试表明,颅骨 AP X 光片上的 AID 测量结果具有高度一致性(R = 0.906,p < 0.001)。在对照组中,AID 与耳蜗基转长度之间呈负相关,而电极长度与 AID 之间呈正相关(R = 0.947,p < 0.001):颅骨 AP X 光片似乎是测量 AID 的可靠工具。结论:颅骨 AP X 光片似乎是测量 AID 的可靠工具,在 IEM 病例中,考虑到耳蜗的尺寸,选择适当长度的电极非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Otology & Neurotology
Otology & Neurotology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
14.30%
发文量
509
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​Otology & Neurotology publishes original articles relating to both clinical and basic science aspects of otology, neurotology, and cranial base surgery. As the foremost journal in its field, it has become the favored place for publishing the best of new science relating to the human ear and its diseases. The broadly international character of its contributing authors, editorial board, and readership provides the Journal its decidedly global perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信