{"title":"Angular Insertion Depth in Inner Ear Malformations, Relationship to Cochlear Size, and Implications for Electrode Selection.","authors":"Burçay Tellioğlu, Levent Sennaroğlu","doi":"10.1097/MAO.0000000000004357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objectives were to determine the interrater agreement of the Skull AP X-ray in measuring angular insertion depth (AID), to provide descriptive information about the insertion depths of different electrodes used in inner ear malformations (IEMs), to investigate the effect of cochlear size and electrode length on AID, and to guide clinicians in electrode selection in IEMs.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective case review.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Tertiary referral center.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>A total of 198 IEMs (n = 169 patients) and 60 cochleae with normal anatomy (n = 60 patients) were selected from patients with severe mixed or sensorineural hearing loss who presented to our clinic and underwent cochlear implantation (CI) between January 2010 and December 2022.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Three neurotologists independently measured AID on Skull AP X-rays. Basal turn length of the cochlea was measured in axial and coronal oblique reformatted sections on HRCT images.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Interrater reliability (ICC) of the AID measurements on Skull AP X-ray, determining the impact of cochlea size and electrode length on AID measurements.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The interrater reliability (ICC) test showed a high level of consistency in measuring AID in the Skull AP X-ray ( R = 0.906, p < 0.001). In the control group, a negative correlation was observed between the AID and the basal turn length of the cochlea, while a positive correlation was found between electrode length and AID ( R = 0.947, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Skull AP X-ray appears to be a dependable tool for measuring AID. In cases of IEMs, it is important to select an electrode of appropriate length, considering the dimensions of the cochlea.</p>","PeriodicalId":19732,"journal":{"name":"Otology & Neurotology","volume":" ","pages":"e9-e16"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otology & Neurotology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000004357","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: The objectives were to determine the interrater agreement of the Skull AP X-ray in measuring angular insertion depth (AID), to provide descriptive information about the insertion depths of different electrodes used in inner ear malformations (IEMs), to investigate the effect of cochlear size and electrode length on AID, and to guide clinicians in electrode selection in IEMs.
Study design: Retrospective case review.
Setting: Tertiary referral center.
Patients: A total of 198 IEMs (n = 169 patients) and 60 cochleae with normal anatomy (n = 60 patients) were selected from patients with severe mixed or sensorineural hearing loss who presented to our clinic and underwent cochlear implantation (CI) between January 2010 and December 2022.
Interventions: Three neurotologists independently measured AID on Skull AP X-rays. Basal turn length of the cochlea was measured in axial and coronal oblique reformatted sections on HRCT images.
Main outcome measures: Interrater reliability (ICC) of the AID measurements on Skull AP X-ray, determining the impact of cochlea size and electrode length on AID measurements.
Results: The interrater reliability (ICC) test showed a high level of consistency in measuring AID in the Skull AP X-ray ( R = 0.906, p < 0.001). In the control group, a negative correlation was observed between the AID and the basal turn length of the cochlea, while a positive correlation was found between electrode length and AID ( R = 0.947, p < 0.001).
Conclusions: The Skull AP X-ray appears to be a dependable tool for measuring AID. In cases of IEMs, it is important to select an electrode of appropriate length, considering the dimensions of the cochlea.
目的研究目的:确定颅骨AP X光片在测量角度插入深度(AID)方面的交互一致性,提供有关内耳畸形(IEM)中使用的不同电极插入深度的描述性信息,研究耳蜗大小和电极长度对AID的影响,并指导临床医生在内耳畸形中选择电极:研究地点:三级转诊中心研究地点:三级转诊中心:从 2010 年 1 月至 2022 年 12 月期间在本诊所就诊并接受人工耳蜗植入术(CI)的严重混合性或感音神经性听力损失患者中挑选出 198 例 IEM(n = 169 例患者)和 60 例具有正常解剖结构的耳蜗(n = 60 例患者):三位神经科医生在颅骨 AP X 光片上独立测量 AID。主要结果测量:主要结果测量:颅骨 AP X 光片上 AID 测量的互测可靠性(ICC),确定耳蜗大小和电极长度对 AID 测量的影响:测量者间可靠性(ICC)测试表明,颅骨 AP X 光片上的 AID 测量结果具有高度一致性(R = 0.906,p < 0.001)。在对照组中,AID 与耳蜗基转长度之间呈负相关,而电极长度与 AID 之间呈正相关(R = 0.947,p < 0.001):颅骨 AP X 光片似乎是测量 AID 的可靠工具。结论:颅骨 AP X 光片似乎是测量 AID 的可靠工具,在 IEM 病例中,考虑到耳蜗的尺寸,选择适当长度的电极非常重要。
期刊介绍:
Otology & Neurotology publishes original articles relating to both clinical and basic science aspects of otology, neurotology, and cranial base surgery. As the foremost journal in its field, it has become the favored place for publishing the best of new science relating to the human ear and its diseases. The broadly international character of its contributing authors, editorial board, and readership provides the Journal its decidedly global perspective.