Genetic and environmental contributions to adult attachment styles: Evidence from the Minnesota Twin Registry.

IF 6.4 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Keely A Dugan, Jacob J Kunkel, R Chris Fraley, D A Briley, Matt McGue, Robert F Krueger, Glenn I Roisman
{"title":"Genetic and environmental contributions to adult attachment styles: Evidence from the Minnesota Twin Registry.","authors":"Keely A Dugan, Jacob J Kunkel, R Chris Fraley, D A Briley, Matt McGue, Robert F Krueger, Glenn I Roisman","doi":"10.1037/pspp0000516","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Attachment theory, as originally outlined by Bowlby (1973, 1980, 1969/1982), suggests that the ways people think, feel, and behave in close relationships are shaped by the dynamic interplay between their genes and their social environment. Research on adult attachment, however, has largely focused on the latter, providing only a partial picture of how attachment styles emerge and develop throughout life. The present research leveraged data from the Minnesota Twin Registry, a large sample of older adult twins (<i>N</i> = 1,377 twins; 678 pairs; <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 70.40 years, <i>SD</i> = 5.42), to examine the relative contributions of genetic and environmental factors to adult attachment styles. Participants reported on both their <i>general</i> attachment styles and <i>relationship-specific</i> attachments to their mothers, fathers, partners, and best friends. The results suggest that attachment styles are partly heritable (∼36%) and partly attributable to environmental factors that are not shared between twins (∼64%). Heritability estimates were somewhat higher for parent-specific attachment styles (∼51%), whereas nonshared environmental factors accounted for larger proportions of the variance in partner- and best friend-specific attachment styles. Using multivariate biometric models, we also examined the genetic and environmental factors underlying the covariation among people's relationship-specific attachment styles. The findings indicate that the similarities among people's avoidant tendencies in different relationships can be explained by a single, higher order latent factor (e.g., global avoidance). In contrast, the genetic and environmental factors underlying attachment anxiety appear to be more differentiated across specific close relationships. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":16691,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality and social psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of personality and social psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000516","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Attachment theory, as originally outlined by Bowlby (1973, 1980, 1969/1982), suggests that the ways people think, feel, and behave in close relationships are shaped by the dynamic interplay between their genes and their social environment. Research on adult attachment, however, has largely focused on the latter, providing only a partial picture of how attachment styles emerge and develop throughout life. The present research leveraged data from the Minnesota Twin Registry, a large sample of older adult twins (N = 1,377 twins; 678 pairs; Mage = 70.40 years, SD = 5.42), to examine the relative contributions of genetic and environmental factors to adult attachment styles. Participants reported on both their general attachment styles and relationship-specific attachments to their mothers, fathers, partners, and best friends. The results suggest that attachment styles are partly heritable (∼36%) and partly attributable to environmental factors that are not shared between twins (∼64%). Heritability estimates were somewhat higher for parent-specific attachment styles (∼51%), whereas nonshared environmental factors accounted for larger proportions of the variance in partner- and best friend-specific attachment styles. Using multivariate biometric models, we also examined the genetic and environmental factors underlying the covariation among people's relationship-specific attachment styles. The findings indicate that the similarities among people's avoidant tendencies in different relationships can be explained by a single, higher order latent factor (e.g., global avoidance). In contrast, the genetic and environmental factors underlying attachment anxiety appear to be more differentiated across specific close relationships. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

遗传和环境对成人依恋风格的影响:来自明尼苏达双胞胎登记处的证据。
鲍尔比(Bowlby,1973 年、1980 年、1969 年/1982 年)最初提出的依恋理论认为,人们在亲密关系中的思维、感觉和行为方式是由其基因和社会环境之间的动态相互作用形成的。然而,对成人依恋关系的研究主要集中在后者,只能提供依恋风格如何在一生中出现和发展的部分情况。本研究利用明尼苏达双胞胎登记处(Minnesota Twin Registry)的数据(样本数=1,377对双胞胎,678对;年龄=70.40岁,标准差=5.42),对遗传和环境因素对成人依恋风格的相对贡献进行了研究。参与者报告了他们的一般依恋风格,以及与母亲、父亲、伴侣和好友的特定关系依恋。结果表明,依恋风格部分是遗传的(∼36%),部分归因于双胞胎之间不共享的环境因素(∼64%)。父母特异性依恋风格的遗传估计值略高(∼51%),而非共享环境因素在伴侣和挚友特异性依恋风格的变异中占较大比例。利用多变量生物计量模型,我们还研究了人们在特定关系中依恋方式的共变性背后的遗传和环境因素。研究结果表明,人们在不同关系中的回避倾向的相似性可以用一个单一的高阶潜在因素(如整体回避)来解释。相比之下,在特定的亲密关系中,依恋焦虑的遗传和环境因素似乎更具差异性。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
3.90%
发文量
250
期刊介绍: Journal of personality and social psychology publishes original papers in all areas of personality and social psychology and emphasizes empirical reports, but may include specialized theoretical, methodological, and review papers.Journal of personality and social psychology is divided into three independently edited sections. Attitudes and Social Cognition addresses all aspects of psychology (e.g., attitudes, cognition, emotion, motivation) that take place in significant micro- and macrolevel social contexts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信