Alberto Monje, Maria Costanza Soldini, Paul S Rosen, Dennis Tarnow, Jose Nart, Ramón Pons
{"title":"Alveolar Bone Reconstruction Simultaneous to Implant Removal due to Advanced Peri-Implantitis Defects: A Proof of Concept.","authors":"Alberto Monje, Maria Costanza Soldini, Paul S Rosen, Dennis Tarnow, Jose Nart, Ramón Pons","doi":"10.1111/jerd.13352","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of alveolar bone reconstruction simultaneous to implant removal due to peri-implantitis.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Partial or fully dentulous patients subjected to implant removal due to advanced peri-implantitis (≥ 50% of bone loss) lesions and seeking to have the failed implant replaced for esthetic or functional reasons were consecutively included. Guided bone regeneration was performed by means of a mixture of xenograft and autogenous bone and a ribose cross-linked barrier membrane. Re-entry for implant placement was performed at 4-month follow-up. Overall, six radiographic variables were assessed before (T0) and after (T1) alveolar bone reconstruction at four levels in ridge width (RW) and height (RH). Peri-implant conditions were evaluated at latest follow-up. Simple and multiple binary logistic regression models were calculated using generalized estimation equations to evaluate the effect of baseline upon reconstructive outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 20 patients (n<sub>implant</sub> = 39) met the inclusion criteria. Alveolar RW and RH were augmented from T0 to T1 at all levels. All implants achieved primary stability. Only ~13% were subjected to ancillary bone regeneration simultaneous to implant placement. After a mean follow-up period after loading of ~2.2 years, ~70% implants demonstrated peri-implant health, while mucositis was diagnosed in the remaining implants.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The performance of alveolar bone reconstruction in residual partially contained defects simultaneous to implant removal due to peri-implantitis lesions demonstrates being safe and effective for implant site development.</p>","PeriodicalId":15988,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.13352","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of alveolar bone reconstruction simultaneous to implant removal due to peri-implantitis.
Material and methods: Partial or fully dentulous patients subjected to implant removal due to advanced peri-implantitis (≥ 50% of bone loss) lesions and seeking to have the failed implant replaced for esthetic or functional reasons were consecutively included. Guided bone regeneration was performed by means of a mixture of xenograft and autogenous bone and a ribose cross-linked barrier membrane. Re-entry for implant placement was performed at 4-month follow-up. Overall, six radiographic variables were assessed before (T0) and after (T1) alveolar bone reconstruction at four levels in ridge width (RW) and height (RH). Peri-implant conditions were evaluated at latest follow-up. Simple and multiple binary logistic regression models were calculated using generalized estimation equations to evaluate the effect of baseline upon reconstructive outcomes.
Results: In total, 20 patients (nimplant = 39) met the inclusion criteria. Alveolar RW and RH were augmented from T0 to T1 at all levels. All implants achieved primary stability. Only ~13% were subjected to ancillary bone regeneration simultaneous to implant placement. After a mean follow-up period after loading of ~2.2 years, ~70% implants demonstrated peri-implant health, while mucositis was diagnosed in the remaining implants.
Conclusion: The performance of alveolar bone reconstruction in residual partially contained defects simultaneous to implant removal due to peri-implantitis lesions demonstrates being safe and effective for implant site development.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry (JERD) is the longest standing peer-reviewed journal devoted solely to advancing the knowledge and practice of esthetic dentistry. Its goal is to provide the very latest evidence-based information in the realm of contemporary interdisciplinary esthetic dentistry through high quality clinical papers, sound research reports and educational features.
The range of topics covered in the journal includes:
- Interdisciplinary esthetic concepts
- Implants
- Conservative adhesive restorations
- Tooth Whitening
- Prosthodontic materials and techniques
- Dental materials
- Orthodontic, periodontal and endodontic esthetics
- Esthetics related research
- Innovations in esthetics