Feasibility of endoscopic resection for superficial laryngopharyngeal cancer after radiotherapy.

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Hiroshi Ashizawa, Yoichi Yamamoto, Takashi Mukaigawa, Noboru Kawata, Yuki Maeda, Masao Yoshida, Tatsunori Minamide, Kinichi Hotta, Kenichiro Imai, Sayo Ito, Kazunori Takada, Junya Sato, Hirotoshi Ishiwatari, Hiroyuki Matsubayashi, Hiroyuki Ono
{"title":"Feasibility of endoscopic resection for superficial laryngopharyngeal cancer after radiotherapy.","authors":"Hiroshi Ashizawa, Yoichi Yamamoto, Takashi Mukaigawa, Noboru Kawata, Yuki Maeda, Masao Yoshida, Tatsunori Minamide, Kinichi Hotta, Kenichiro Imai, Sayo Ito, Kazunori Takada, Junya Sato, Hirotoshi Ishiwatari, Hiroyuki Matsubayashi, Hiroyuki Ono","doi":"10.1111/jgh.16789","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>We aimed to elucidate the feasibility of endoscopic resection (ER) for salvage and metachronous lesions following chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and radiotherapy (RT) for laryngopharyngeal cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive patients who underwent ER for superficial laryngopharyngeal cancer between March 2005 and September 2022 were retrospectively reviewed and stratified into salvage (16 patients, 16 lesions), metachronous (18 patients, 27 lesions), and naïve RT (217 patients, 306 lesions) groups. Salvage lesions were residual or local recurrent after CRT, and metachronous lesions were second primary lesions in the irradiated field following complete response. Short-term outcomes were evaluated, including R0 resection, en bloc resection, procedure time, adverse events, local recurrence rate, and clinical course.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The en bloc resection rates were 88%, 93%, and 88%; R0 resection rates were 50%, 52%, and 56%; procedure times were 25, 27, and 25 min, in the salvage, metachronous, and naïve RT groups, none of which were significantly different among the three groups. Although adverse event rates tended to be higher in the salvage and metachronous groups than in the naïve RT group, the differences were not significant (18%, 15%, and 8%). The cumulative local recurrence rates at 2 years were 21%, 13%, and 6%, significantly higher in the salvage group than in the naïve RT group. The local control rates with ER alone were 94%, 93%, and 97%; none were significantly different among the three groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ER for salvage and metachronous superficial lesions can be safely performed, suggesting its acceptability as a minimally invasive treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":15877,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgh.16789","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aim: We aimed to elucidate the feasibility of endoscopic resection (ER) for salvage and metachronous lesions following chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and radiotherapy (RT) for laryngopharyngeal cancer.

Methods: Consecutive patients who underwent ER for superficial laryngopharyngeal cancer between March 2005 and September 2022 were retrospectively reviewed and stratified into salvage (16 patients, 16 lesions), metachronous (18 patients, 27 lesions), and naïve RT (217 patients, 306 lesions) groups. Salvage lesions were residual or local recurrent after CRT, and metachronous lesions were second primary lesions in the irradiated field following complete response. Short-term outcomes were evaluated, including R0 resection, en bloc resection, procedure time, adverse events, local recurrence rate, and clinical course.

Results: The en bloc resection rates were 88%, 93%, and 88%; R0 resection rates were 50%, 52%, and 56%; procedure times were 25, 27, and 25 min, in the salvage, metachronous, and naïve RT groups, none of which were significantly different among the three groups. Although adverse event rates tended to be higher in the salvage and metachronous groups than in the naïve RT group, the differences were not significant (18%, 15%, and 8%). The cumulative local recurrence rates at 2 years were 21%, 13%, and 6%, significantly higher in the salvage group than in the naïve RT group. The local control rates with ER alone were 94%, 93%, and 97%; none were significantly different among the three groups.

Conclusion: ER for salvage and metachronous superficial lesions can be safely performed, suggesting its acceptability as a minimally invasive treatment.

放疗后内窥镜切除浅表喉咽癌的可行性。
背景和目的:我们的目的是阐明喉咽癌化疗(CRT)和放疗(RT)后内镜切除术(ER)用于挽救性病变和间变性病变的可行性:回顾性分析2005年3月至2022年9月期间因浅表喉咽癌接受ER治疗的连续患者,并将其分为挽救病灶组(16例患者,16个病灶)、晚期病灶组(18例患者,27个病灶)和新RT组(217例患者,306个病灶)。挽救性病变是指 CRT 后的残留病变或局部复发病变,转移性病变是指完全反应后照射野内的第二个原发病变。对短期结果进行了评估,包括R0切除率、全灶切除率、手术时间、不良事件、局部复发率和临床过程:抢救组、新近RT组和幼稚RT组的全块切除率分别为88%、93%和88%;R0切除率分别为50%、52%和56%;手术时间分别为25分钟、27分钟和25分钟,三组之间无显著差异。虽然抢救组和近交组的不良事件发生率往往高于新RT组,但差异并不显著(18%、15%和8%)。2年的累积局部复发率分别为21%、13%和6%,抢救组明显高于新RT组。单用ER的局部控制率分别为94%、93%和97%,三组间无明显差异:结论:ER可安全地用于挽救性和转移性浅表病灶,表明其作为微创治疗的可接受性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
2.40%
发文量
326
审稿时长
2.3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology is produced 12 times per year and publishes peer-reviewed original papers, reviews and editorials concerned with clinical practice and research in the fields of hepatology, gastroenterology and endoscopy. Papers cover the medical, radiological, pathological, biochemical, physiological and historical aspects of the subject areas. All submitted papers are reviewed by at least two referees expert in the field of the submitted paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信