Topical steroid use for suppression of hypergranulation in burns: Trends across the Atlantic.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Yoram Shoham, Paul Comish, Rotem Tsur, Eldad Silberstein, Yuval Krieger, Tal Eliav, Michelle Cleary, Rachel Kornhaber, Jeremy Goverman
{"title":"Topical steroid use for suppression of hypergranulation in burns: Trends across the Atlantic.","authors":"Yoram Shoham, Paul Comish, Rotem Tsur, Eldad Silberstein, Yuval Krieger, Tal Eliav, Michelle Cleary, Rachel Kornhaber, Jeremy Goverman","doi":"10.1093/jbcr/irae191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hypergranulated wounds from thermal injury remain a complex and debilitating problem for burn patients. Currently, there is no standard therapy to prevent or treat hypergranulation following burn injury. Many centers use topical corticosteroids; however, their use seems to be geographically dependent and controversial. The primary aim of this study was to quantify the current use of topical corticosteroids for post-burn hypergranulation in North America (NA) and Europe, while secondarily assessing for perceptions of safety and efficacy. We designed a survey that was distributed to the members of the European and American Burn Associations. Data was extracted and analyzed using SPSS software. A total of 165 respondents completed the survey (90 and 75 for the European and NA members, respectively). Seventy-one of the 90 (78.9%) European respondents reported they routinely use topical steroids for suppression of hypergranulation tissue in burns, versus 25 of the 75 (33.3%) NA respondents (p<0.001). European respondents, compared to NA respondents, were significantly more likely to consider topical steroid use safe (100% vs. 74.4%, p <0.001) and effective (98.6% vs. 66.7%, p < 0.001) for treatment of hypergranulated burn wounds. There was no significant difference in reported systemic effects seen after topical steroid use when comparing NA respondents and European respondents (6.5% vs. 6.9%, p > 0.10). The results of this study suggest that the use of steroids for hypergranulation tissue in burn care is more prevalent in Europe than NA, which may be due to discordant views on safety and efficacy despite minimal reported adverse effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":15205,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irae191","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hypergranulated wounds from thermal injury remain a complex and debilitating problem for burn patients. Currently, there is no standard therapy to prevent or treat hypergranulation following burn injury. Many centers use topical corticosteroids; however, their use seems to be geographically dependent and controversial. The primary aim of this study was to quantify the current use of topical corticosteroids for post-burn hypergranulation in North America (NA) and Europe, while secondarily assessing for perceptions of safety and efficacy. We designed a survey that was distributed to the members of the European and American Burn Associations. Data was extracted and analyzed using SPSS software. A total of 165 respondents completed the survey (90 and 75 for the European and NA members, respectively). Seventy-one of the 90 (78.9%) European respondents reported they routinely use topical steroids for suppression of hypergranulation tissue in burns, versus 25 of the 75 (33.3%) NA respondents (p<0.001). European respondents, compared to NA respondents, were significantly more likely to consider topical steroid use safe (100% vs. 74.4%, p <0.001) and effective (98.6% vs. 66.7%, p < 0.001) for treatment of hypergranulated burn wounds. There was no significant difference in reported systemic effects seen after topical steroid use when comparing NA respondents and European respondents (6.5% vs. 6.9%, p > 0.10). The results of this study suggest that the use of steroids for hypergranulation tissue in burn care is more prevalent in Europe than NA, which may be due to discordant views on safety and efficacy despite minimal reported adverse effects.

烧伤后局部使用类固醇抑制过度颗粒化:大西洋两岸的趋势。
对于烧伤病人来说,热损伤引起的过度肉芽肿伤口仍然是一个复杂而又令人沮丧的问题。目前,还没有预防或治疗烧伤后过度肉芽肿的标准疗法。许多中心使用外用皮质类固醇,但其使用似乎与地域有关,且存在争议。本研究的主要目的是量化北美和欧洲目前使用外用皮质类固醇治疗烧伤后过度肉芽肿的情况,同时评估其安全性和有效性。我们设计了一份调查问卷,分发给欧洲和美国烧伤协会的成员。我们使用 SPSS 软件对数据进行了提取和分析。共有 165 名受访者完成了调查(欧洲会员 90 人,北美会员 75 人)。在 90 位欧洲受访者中,有 71 位(78.9%)表示他们经常使用局部类固醇来抑制烧伤组织的过度增生,而在 75 位北美受访者中,有 25 位(33.3%)表示他们经常使用局部类固醇来抑制烧伤组织的过度增生(P 0.10)。这项研究的结果表明,在烧伤护理中使用类固醇治疗过度肉芽组织的情况在欧洲比在北美洲更普遍,这可能是由于对安全性和有效性的看法不一致,尽管报告的不良反应极少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
21.40%
发文量
535
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Burn Care & Research provides the latest information on advances in burn prevention, research, education, delivery of acute care, and research to all members of the burn care team. As the official publication of the American Burn Association, this is the only U.S. journal devoted exclusively to the treatment and research of patients with burns. Original, peer-reviewed articles present the latest information on surgical procedures, acute care, reconstruction, burn prevention, and research and education. Other topics include physical therapy/occupational therapy, nutrition, current events in the evolving healthcare debate, and reports on the newest computer software for diagnostics and treatment. The Journal serves all burn care specialists, from physicians, nurses, and physical and occupational therapists to psychologists, counselors, and researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信