Slowing Cognitive Decline in Major Depressive Disorder and Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

IF 22.5 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Tarek K Rajji, Christopher R Bowie, Nathan Herrmann, Bruce G Pollock, Krista L Lanctôt, Sanjeev Kumar, Alastair J Flint, Linda Mah, Corinne E Fischer, Meryl A Butters, Marom Bikson, James L Kennedy, Daniel M Blumberger, Zafiris J Daskalakis, Damien Gallagher, Mark J Rapoport, Nicolaas P L G Paul Verhoeff, Angela C Golas, Ariel Graff-Guerrero, Erica Vieira, Aristotle N Voineskos, Heather Brooks, Ashley Melichercik, Kevin E Thorpe, Benoit H Mulsant
{"title":"Slowing Cognitive Decline in Major Depressive Disorder and Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Tarek K Rajji, Christopher R Bowie, Nathan Herrmann, Bruce G Pollock, Krista L Lanctôt, Sanjeev Kumar, Alastair J Flint, Linda Mah, Corinne E Fischer, Meryl A Butters, Marom Bikson, James L Kennedy, Daniel M Blumberger, Zafiris J Daskalakis, Damien Gallagher, Mark J Rapoport, Nicolaas P L G Paul Verhoeff, Angela C Golas, Ariel Graff-Guerrero, Erica Vieira, Aristotle N Voineskos, Heather Brooks, Ashley Melichercik, Kevin E Thorpe, Benoit H Mulsant","doi":"10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2024.3241","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Older adults with major depressive disorder (MDD) or mild cognitive impairment (MCI) are at high risk for cognitive decline.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the efficacy of cognitive remediation (CR) plus transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) targeting the prefrontal cortex in slowing cognitive decline, acutely improving cognition, and reducing progression to MCI or dementia in older adults with remitted MDD (rMDD), MCI, or both.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This randomized clinical trial was conducted at 5 academic hospitals in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Participants were older adults who had rMDD (with or without MCI, age ≥65 y) or MCI without rMDD (age ≥60 y). Assessments were made at baseline, month 2, and yearly from baseline for 3 to 7 years.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>CR plus tDCS (hereafter, active) or sham plus sham 5 days a week for 8 weeks followed by twice-a-year 5-day boosters and daily at-home CR or sham CR.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The primary outcome was change in global composite cognitive score. Secondary outcomes included changes in 6 cognitive domains, moderating effect of the diagnosis, moderating effect of APOE ε4 status, change in composite score at month 2, and progression to MCI or dementia over time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 486 older adults who provided consent, 375 (with rMDD, MCI, or both) received at least 1 intervention session (mean [SD] age, 72.2 [6.4] years; 232 women [62%] and 143 men [38%]). Over a median follow-up of 48.3 months (range, 2.1-85.9), CR and tDCS slowed cognitive decline in older adults with rMDD or MCI (adjusted z score difference [active - sham] at month 60, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.07 to 0.35; likelihood ratio test [LRT] P = .006). In the preplanned primary analysis, CR and tDCS did not improve cognition acutely (adjusted z score difference [active - sham] at month 2, 0.06, 95% CI, -0.006 to 0.12). Similarly, the effect of CR and tDCS on delaying progression from normal cognition to MCI or MCI to dementia was weak and not significant (hazard ratio, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.40 to 1.08; P = .10). Preplanned analyses showed treatment effects for executive function (LRT P = .04) and verbal memory (LRT P = .02) and interactions with diagnosis (P = .01) and APOE ε4 (P < .001) demonstrating a larger effect among those with rMDD and in noncarriers of APOE ε4.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>The study showed that CR and tDCS, both targeting the prefrontal cortex, is efficacious in slowing cognitive decline in older adults at risk of cognitive decline, particularly those with rMDD (with or without MCI) and in those at low genetic risk for Alzheimer disease.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02386670.</p>","PeriodicalId":14800,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":22.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11525663/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2024.3241","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Older adults with major depressive disorder (MDD) or mild cognitive impairment (MCI) are at high risk for cognitive decline.

Objective: To assess the efficacy of cognitive remediation (CR) plus transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) targeting the prefrontal cortex in slowing cognitive decline, acutely improving cognition, and reducing progression to MCI or dementia in older adults with remitted MDD (rMDD), MCI, or both.

Design, setting, and participants: This randomized clinical trial was conducted at 5 academic hospitals in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Participants were older adults who had rMDD (with or without MCI, age ≥65 y) or MCI without rMDD (age ≥60 y). Assessments were made at baseline, month 2, and yearly from baseline for 3 to 7 years.

Interventions: CR plus tDCS (hereafter, active) or sham plus sham 5 days a week for 8 weeks followed by twice-a-year 5-day boosters and daily at-home CR or sham CR.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was change in global composite cognitive score. Secondary outcomes included changes in 6 cognitive domains, moderating effect of the diagnosis, moderating effect of APOE ε4 status, change in composite score at month 2, and progression to MCI or dementia over time.

Results: Of 486 older adults who provided consent, 375 (with rMDD, MCI, or both) received at least 1 intervention session (mean [SD] age, 72.2 [6.4] years; 232 women [62%] and 143 men [38%]). Over a median follow-up of 48.3 months (range, 2.1-85.9), CR and tDCS slowed cognitive decline in older adults with rMDD or MCI (adjusted z score difference [active - sham] at month 60, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.07 to 0.35; likelihood ratio test [LRT] P = .006). In the preplanned primary analysis, CR and tDCS did not improve cognition acutely (adjusted z score difference [active - sham] at month 2, 0.06, 95% CI, -0.006 to 0.12). Similarly, the effect of CR and tDCS on delaying progression from normal cognition to MCI or MCI to dementia was weak and not significant (hazard ratio, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.40 to 1.08; P = .10). Preplanned analyses showed treatment effects for executive function (LRT P = .04) and verbal memory (LRT P = .02) and interactions with diagnosis (P = .01) and APOE ε4 (P < .001) demonstrating a larger effect among those with rMDD and in noncarriers of APOE ε4.

Conclusions and relevance: The study showed that CR and tDCS, both targeting the prefrontal cortex, is efficacious in slowing cognitive decline in older adults at risk of cognitive decline, particularly those with rMDD (with or without MCI) and in those at low genetic risk for Alzheimer disease.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02386670.

减缓重度抑郁症和轻度认知障碍患者的认知能力衰退:随机临床试验
重要性:患有重度抑郁症(MDD)或轻度认知障碍(MCI)的老年人是认知能力下降的高危人群:目的:评估针对前额叶皮质的认知矫正(CR)加经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)在减缓认知能力下降、急性改善认知能力以及减少MCI或痴呆进展方面的疗效:这项随机临床试验在加拿大安大略省多伦多市的 5 家学术医院进行。参与者为患有rMDD(伴有或不伴有MCI,年龄≥65岁)或不伴有rMDD的MCI(年龄≥60岁)的老年人。在基线期、第2个月和从基线期开始的3至7年内每年进行一次评估:干预措施:CR加tDCS(以下简称为活性)或假CR加假CR,每周5天,为期8周,之后每年两次,每次5天,每天在家进行CR或假CR:主要结果和测量指标:主要结果是总体综合认知评分的变化。次要结果包括 6 个认知领域的变化、诊断的调节作用、APOE ε4 状态的调节作用、第 2 个月时综合得分的变化以及随着时间的推移发展为 MCI 或痴呆:在征得同意的 486 名老年人中,有 375 人(rMDD、MCI 或两者兼有)接受了至少一次干预治疗(平均 [SD] 年龄 72.2 [6.4] 岁;232 名女性 [62%] 和 143 名男性 [38%])。在48.3个月的中位随访期间(范围为2.1-85.9),CR和tDCS减缓了患有rMDD或MCI的老年人的认知能力下降(第60个月时调整后的z评分差异[活动-假]为0.21;95% CI为0.07-0.35;似然比检验[LRT] P = .006)。在预先计划的主要分析中,CR 和 tDCS 并未改善急性期的认知能力(第 2 个月时调整后的 z 评分差异[活动-假],0.06;95% CI,-0.006 至 0.12)。同样,CR 和 tDCS 对延缓认知功能从正常发展为 MCI 或 MCI 发展为痴呆症的效果也很弱,且不显著(危险比为 0.66;95% CI 为 0.40 至 1.08;P = .10)。预先计划的分析显示,执行功能(LRT P = .04)和言语记忆(LRT P = .02)的治疗效果以及与诊断(P = .01)和 APOE ε4(P 结论和相关性)的交互作用:该研究表明,CR 和 tDCS(均以前额叶皮层为靶点)对减缓有认知能力下降风险的老年人的认知能力下降具有疗效,尤其是那些患有 rMDD(伴有或不伴有 MCI)以及阿尔茨海默病遗传风险较低的老年人:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:NCT02386670。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JAMA Psychiatry
JAMA Psychiatry PSYCHIATRY-
CiteScore
30.60
自引率
1.90%
发文量
233
期刊介绍: JAMA Psychiatry is a global, peer-reviewed journal catering to clinicians, scholars, and research scientists in psychiatry, mental health, behavioral science, and related fields. The Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry originated in 1919, splitting into two journals in 1959: Archives of Neurology and Archives of General Psychiatry. In 2013, these evolved into JAMA Neurology and JAMA Psychiatry, respectively. JAMA Psychiatry is affiliated with the JAMA Network, a group of peer-reviewed medical and specialty publications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信