Current Self-reported Pain Before and After Cure of Hepatitis C Among Persons Who Actively Inject Drugs.

IF 4.2 3区 医学 Q1 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Judith I Tsui, Natasha T Ludwig-Barron, Jocelyn R James, Moonseong Heo, Laksika B Sivaraj, Julia Arnsten, Paula J Lum, Lynn E Taylor, Shruti H Mehta, Oluwaseun Falade-Nwulia, Judith Feinberg, Arthur Y Kim, Brianna Norton, Kimberly Page, Alain H Litwin
{"title":"Current Self-reported Pain Before and After Cure of Hepatitis C Among Persons Who Actively Inject Drugs.","authors":"Judith I Tsui, Natasha T Ludwig-Barron, Jocelyn R James, Moonseong Heo, Laksika B Sivaraj, Julia Arnsten, Paula J Lum, Lynn E Taylor, Shruti H Mehta, Oluwaseun Falade-Nwulia, Judith Feinberg, Arthur Y Kim, Brianna Norton, Kimberly Page, Alain H Litwin","doi":"10.1097/ADM.0000000000001398","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Questions remain on the relationship between pain and hepatitis C virus cure among persons who inject drugs (PWID). This study aimed to explore whether achieving hepatitis C virus cure reduced pain severity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prespecified secondary analysis utilized data from a pragmatic clinical trial of care delivery models that enrolled PWIDs between 2016 and 2018 and treated with sofosbuvir/velpatasvir. Current pain severity (0-100) was assessed before and after treatment and 5-point Likert pain scales were used to determine moderate or greater current pain at baseline; the duration and etiology of current pain were not assessed. We used generalized mixed-effects linear models to test whether achieving sustained virologic response (SVR), that is, cure, was associated with lower numeric pain scores (primary outcome) posttreatment, adjusting for potential confounders (age, sex, intervention assignment, time/visit, and baseline pain severity category) and to examine changes in pain over time. Adjusted means estimated from a fitted model for pain severity at each visit were compared between participants who did and did not achieve SVR, both for the sample overall and for the subsample of participants who reported moderate or greater pain at baseline.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 501 participants who were randomized, treated with DAAs and had SVR data, moderate or greater pain was reported at baseline in 174 (34.7%) of participants. Numeric pain severity did not significantly differ by SVR status at any study visit except for the week 48 visit from baseline, when the estimated pain score was significantly higher for those who failed treatment (38.0 vs 26.3, P = 0.033). Among the subsample with baseline moderate or greater pain, pain severity scores were significantly lower in subsequent visits compared to the baseline visit, with the exception of week 48 among participants who did not achieve SVR.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among PWID, achieving SVR did not improve pain severity. However, participants who failed treatment had significantly greater pain at the visit immediately following visit for SVR, which may relate to adverse psychological effects of treatment failure. Among those with baseline moderate or greater pain, pain scores declined post treatment, suggesting that treatment itself (irrespective of SVR) may be associated with improved pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":14744,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Addiction Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Addiction Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ADM.0000000000001398","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Questions remain on the relationship between pain and hepatitis C virus cure among persons who inject drugs (PWID). This study aimed to explore whether achieving hepatitis C virus cure reduced pain severity.

Methods: Prespecified secondary analysis utilized data from a pragmatic clinical trial of care delivery models that enrolled PWIDs between 2016 and 2018 and treated with sofosbuvir/velpatasvir. Current pain severity (0-100) was assessed before and after treatment and 5-point Likert pain scales were used to determine moderate or greater current pain at baseline; the duration and etiology of current pain were not assessed. We used generalized mixed-effects linear models to test whether achieving sustained virologic response (SVR), that is, cure, was associated with lower numeric pain scores (primary outcome) posttreatment, adjusting for potential confounders (age, sex, intervention assignment, time/visit, and baseline pain severity category) and to examine changes in pain over time. Adjusted means estimated from a fitted model for pain severity at each visit were compared between participants who did and did not achieve SVR, both for the sample overall and for the subsample of participants who reported moderate or greater pain at baseline.

Results: Of the 501 participants who were randomized, treated with DAAs and had SVR data, moderate or greater pain was reported at baseline in 174 (34.7%) of participants. Numeric pain severity did not significantly differ by SVR status at any study visit except for the week 48 visit from baseline, when the estimated pain score was significantly higher for those who failed treatment (38.0 vs 26.3, P = 0.033). Among the subsample with baseline moderate or greater pain, pain severity scores were significantly lower in subsequent visits compared to the baseline visit, with the exception of week 48 among participants who did not achieve SVR.

Conclusions: Among PWID, achieving SVR did not improve pain severity. However, participants who failed treatment had significantly greater pain at the visit immediately following visit for SVR, which may relate to adverse psychological effects of treatment failure. Among those with baseline moderate or greater pain, pain scores declined post treatment, suggesting that treatment itself (irrespective of SVR) may be associated with improved pain.

积极注射毒品者在丙型肝炎治愈前后自我报告的当前疼痛情况。
背景:在注射吸毒者(PWID)中,疼痛与丙型肝炎病毒治愈之间的关系仍存在疑问。本研究旨在探讨丙型肝炎病毒治愈是否会减轻疼痛的严重程度:预设的二次分析利用了2016年至2018年间入组并接受索非布韦/韦帕他韦治疗的PWID的护理提供模式的实用临床试验数据。在治疗前后评估了当前疼痛的严重程度(0-100),并使用 5 点 Likert 疼痛量表确定基线时的中度或更严重的当前疼痛;未评估当前疼痛的持续时间和病因。我们使用广义混合效应线性模型来检验获得持续病毒学应答(SVR)(即治愈)是否与治疗后较低的疼痛数字评分(主要结果)相关,并对潜在的混杂因素(年龄、性别、干预分配、时间/就诊情况和基线疼痛严重程度类别)进行调整,同时检验疼痛随时间的变化情况。通过拟合模型估算出的每次就诊时疼痛严重程度的调整均值,对达到和未达到 SVR 的参与者进行了比较,既包括总体样本,也包括基线时报告有中度或更严重疼痛的参与者子样本:在 501 名接受随机分组、DAAs 治疗并获得 SVR 数据的参与者中,有 174 人(34.7%)在基线时报告有中度或更严重的疼痛。除第 48 周基线访视外,在任何研究访视中,不同 SVR 状态下的数字疼痛严重程度均无显著差异,在第 48 周访视中,治疗失败者的估计疼痛评分显著更高(38.0 vs 26.3,P = 0.033)。在基线疼痛程度为中度或更严重的子样本中,除第 48 周未获得 SVR 的参与者外,其后各次检查的疼痛严重程度评分均显著低于基线检查:在感染者中,获得 SVR 并未改善疼痛的严重程度。然而,治疗失败的参与者在紧接着 SVR 访视后的访视中疼痛明显加剧,这可能与治疗失败的不良心理影响有关。在基线疼痛程度为中度或更严重的人群中,治疗后疼痛评分有所下降,这表明治疗本身(无论 SVR 与否)可能与疼痛的改善有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Addiction Medicine
Journal of Addiction Medicine 医学-药物滥用
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
260
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The mission of Journal of Addiction Medicine, the official peer-reviewed journal of the American Society of Addiction Medicine, is to promote excellence in the practice of addiction medicine and in clinical research as well as to support Addiction Medicine as a mainstream medical sub-specialty. Under the guidance of an esteemed Editorial Board, peer-reviewed articles published in the Journal focus on developments in addiction medicine as well as on treatment innovations and ethical, economic, forensic, and social topics including: •addiction and substance use in pregnancy •adolescent addiction and at-risk use •the drug-exposed neonate •pharmacology •all psychoactive substances relevant to addiction, including alcohol, nicotine, caffeine, marijuana, opioids, stimulants and other prescription and illicit substances •diagnosis •neuroimaging techniques •treatment of special populations •treatment, early intervention and prevention of alcohol and drug use disorders •methodological issues in addiction research •pain and addiction, prescription drug use disorder •co-occurring addiction, medical and psychiatric disorders •pathological gambling disorder, sexual and other behavioral addictions •pathophysiology of addiction •behavioral and pharmacological treatments •issues in graduate medical education •recovery •health services delivery •ethical, legal and liability issues in addiction medicine practice •drug testing •self- and mutual-help.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信