Association Between Pericoronary Fat Attenuation Index as Evaluated by Coronary Artery CT Angiography and Clinical Interventions in Lipid Management Among Patients with Coronary Artery Disease.

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to evaluate the relationship between the pericoronary fat attenuation index (FAI), derived from coronary artery computed tomography angiography, and post-lipid management levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Additionally, the study investigates coronary inflammation across different lipid management strategies.

Methods: We selected a cohort comprising 521 CAD patients who met the inclusion criteria. Patients were categorized into well-managed (LDL-C<2.6 mmol/L) and poorly managed (LDL-C≥2.6 mmol/L) groups based on lipid management efficacy. We collected anthropometric measures (height, weight, body mass index, and body surface area) and clinical indicators, including Gensini score, and FAI-related parameters for coronary atherosclerotic lesions. We analyzed the interrelations along these parameters and lipid management using statistical methods and assessed diagnostic value via receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis of these parameters was assessed through.

Results: The poorly managed group exhibited significantly higher levels of total cholesterol, triglycerides, and lower levels of high-density lipoprotein compared to the well-managed group (P < 0.05). Significant differences were observed between the groups in terms of lesion length in the proximal segment of the left anterior descending artery, FAI value in the proximal segment of lesions in the right coronary artery (RCA), volume thickness in the middle segment of RCA lesions, and lesion length in the distal segment of RCA (P < 0.05). ROC curve analysis revealed areas under the curve ranging from 0.484 to 0.660 for the parameters, indicating limited diagnostic efficacy.

Conclusion: The FAI in the RCA varies with lipid management strategies, suggesting it as a valuable metric for monitoring both perivascular inflammation and lipid status in CAD patients. However, its current diagnostic efficacy is limited, indicating the need for further research to improve its clinical utility.