Three-dimensional Patient-specific Quality Assurance Using Beam Delivery Log Data for Pencil Beam Scanning Carbon-ion Radiotherapy.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
In vivo Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.21873/invivo.13776
Masaaki Takashina, Masashi Yagi, Yuuki Noguchi, Taku Nakaji, Noriaki Hamatani, Toshiro Tsubouchi, Tatsuaki Kanai
{"title":"Three-dimensional Patient-specific Quality Assurance Using Beam Delivery Log Data for Pencil Beam Scanning Carbon-ion Radiotherapy.","authors":"Masaaki Takashina, Masashi Yagi, Yuuki Noguchi, Taku Nakaji, Noriaki Hamatani, Toshiro Tsubouchi, Tatsuaki Kanai","doi":"10.21873/invivo.13776","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aim: </strong>In the pencil beam scanning carbon-ion radiotherapy, spot positions are arranged in three dimensions throughout the entire target region. Therefore, dose deviations can occur due to spot position errors in the target. However, performing three-dimensional measurements for routine patient-specific quality assurance (PSQA) is difficult because a simple measurement method has not been established. This study aimed to establish a three-dimensional dose verification method using beam delivery log data.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Pencil beam dose distributions in water were generated through Monte Carlo (MC) calculations. Treatment beam dose distribution was calculated by superposing the pencil beam dose distributions, considering given spot positions and monitor units (referred to as semi-MC, SMC). The aim of this study was to perform gamma analysis (GA) using dose distributions of log data-based SMC instead of measured dose for PSQA. To verify SMC, the SMC depth-dose curves were compared with the measured dose. To assess the equivalence between the proposed and measurement-based methods, pass rates of two-dimensional GA were compared. Furthermore, a three-dimensional GA was performed to investigate clinically suitable criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The SMC dose curves were consistent with measured dose, with a deviation <5%. In two-dimensional GA, pass rates for the proposed method were generally lower than those for measurement-based method. The results of the three-dimensional GA indicated that the proposed method, with criteria of 3%-3 mm and 3%-2 mm, had capabilities comparable to the measurement-based method.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The developed three-dimensional log data-based PSQA method with criteria of 3%-3 mm and 3%-2 mm is clinically applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":13364,"journal":{"name":"In vivo","volume":"38 6","pages":"2935-2944"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11535962/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"In vivo","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21873/invivo.13776","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/aim: In the pencil beam scanning carbon-ion radiotherapy, spot positions are arranged in three dimensions throughout the entire target region. Therefore, dose deviations can occur due to spot position errors in the target. However, performing three-dimensional measurements for routine patient-specific quality assurance (PSQA) is difficult because a simple measurement method has not been established. This study aimed to establish a three-dimensional dose verification method using beam delivery log data.

Materials and methods: Pencil beam dose distributions in water were generated through Monte Carlo (MC) calculations. Treatment beam dose distribution was calculated by superposing the pencil beam dose distributions, considering given spot positions and monitor units (referred to as semi-MC, SMC). The aim of this study was to perform gamma analysis (GA) using dose distributions of log data-based SMC instead of measured dose for PSQA. To verify SMC, the SMC depth-dose curves were compared with the measured dose. To assess the equivalence between the proposed and measurement-based methods, pass rates of two-dimensional GA were compared. Furthermore, a three-dimensional GA was performed to investigate clinically suitable criteria.

Results: The SMC dose curves were consistent with measured dose, with a deviation <5%. In two-dimensional GA, pass rates for the proposed method were generally lower than those for measurement-based method. The results of the three-dimensional GA indicated that the proposed method, with criteria of 3%-3 mm and 3%-2 mm, had capabilities comparable to the measurement-based method.

Conclusion: The developed three-dimensional log data-based PSQA method with criteria of 3%-3 mm and 3%-2 mm is clinically applicable.

利用铅笔束扫描碳离子放疗的光束传输日志数据进行三维患者特定质量保证。
背景/目的:在铅笔束扫描碳离子放射治疗中,整个靶区的光点位置都是三维排列的。因此,靶点位置误差会导致剂量偏差。然而,由于尚未建立一种简单的测量方法,因此很难进行常规患者特定质量保证(PSQA)的三维测量。本研究旨在利用射束传输记录数据建立一种三维剂量验证方法:通过蒙特卡洛(MC)计算生成水中的铅笔束剂量分布。考虑到给定的光斑位置和监测单元(称为半 MC,SMC),通过叠加铅笔束剂量分布来计算治疗束剂量分布。本研究的目的是使用基于对数数据的 SMC 剂量分布代替 PSQA 的测量剂量,进行伽马分析(GA)。为了验证 SMC,将 SMC 深度-剂量曲线与测量剂量进行了比较。为了评估建议方法和基于测量的方法之间的等效性,比较了二维 GA 的通过率。此外,还进行了三维 GA,以研究适合临床的标准:结果:SMC剂量曲线与测量剂量一致,但存在偏差:所开发的基于三维对数数据的 PSQA 方法以 3%-3 毫米和 3%-2 毫米为标准,适用于临床。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
In vivo
In vivo 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
330
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: IN VIVO is an international peer-reviewed journal designed to bring together original high quality works and reviews on experimental and clinical biomedical research within the frames of physiology, pathology and disease management. The topics of IN VIVO include: 1. Experimental development and application of new diagnostic and therapeutic procedures; 2. Pharmacological and toxicological evaluation of new drugs, drug combinations and drug delivery systems; 3. Clinical trials; 4. Development and characterization of models of biomedical research; 5. Cancer diagnosis and treatment; 6. Immunotherapy and vaccines; 7. Radiotherapy, Imaging; 8. Tissue engineering, Regenerative medicine; 9. Carcinogenesis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信