Ki-67 evaluation using deep-learning model-assisted digital image analysis in breast cancer.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q2 CELL BIOLOGY
Histopathology Pub Date : 2024-10-31 DOI:10.1111/his.15356
Hirofumi Matsumoto, Ryota Miyata, Yuma Tsuruta, Norihiro Nakada, Ayako Koki, Mikiko Unesoko, Norie Abe, Hisamitsu Zaha
{"title":"Ki-67 evaluation using deep-learning model-assisted digital image analysis in breast cancer.","authors":"Hirofumi Matsumoto, Ryota Miyata, Yuma Tsuruta, Norihiro Nakada, Ayako Koki, Mikiko Unesoko, Norie Abe, Hisamitsu Zaha","doi":"10.1111/his.15356","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To test the efficacy of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted Ki-67 digital image analysis in invasive breast carcinoma (IBC) with quantitative assessment of AI model performance.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>This study used 494 cases of Ki-67 slide images of IBC core needle biopsies. The methods were divided into two steps: (i) construction of a deep-learning model (DL); and (ii) DL implementation for Ki-67 analysis. First, a DL tissue classifier model (DL-TC) and a DL nuclear detection model (DL-ND) were constructed using HALO AI DenseNet V2 algorithm with 31,924 annotations in 300 Ki-67 digital slide images. Whether the class predicted by DL-TC in the test set was correct compared with the annotation of ground truth at the pixel level was evaluated. Second, DL-TC- and DL-ND-assisted digital image analysis (DL-DIA) was performed in the other 194 luminal-type cases and correlations with manual counting and clinical outcome were investigated to confirm the accuracy and prognostic potential of DL-DIA. The performance of DL-TC was excellent and invasive carcinoma nests were well segmented from other elements (average precision: 0.851; recall: 0.878; F1-score: 0.858). Ki-67 index data and the number of nuclei from DL-DIA were positively correlated with data from manual counting (ρ = 0.961, and 0.928, respectively). High Ki-67 index (cutoff 20%) cases showed significantly worse recurrence-free survival and breast cancer-specific survival (P = 0.024, and 0.032, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The performances of DL-TC and DL-ND were excellent. DL-DIA demonstrated a high degree of concordance with manual counting of Ki-67 and the results of this approach have prognostic potential.</p>","PeriodicalId":13219,"journal":{"name":"Histopathology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Histopathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/his.15356","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: To test the efficacy of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted Ki-67 digital image analysis in invasive breast carcinoma (IBC) with quantitative assessment of AI model performance.

Methods and results: This study used 494 cases of Ki-67 slide images of IBC core needle biopsies. The methods were divided into two steps: (i) construction of a deep-learning model (DL); and (ii) DL implementation for Ki-67 analysis. First, a DL tissue classifier model (DL-TC) and a DL nuclear detection model (DL-ND) were constructed using HALO AI DenseNet V2 algorithm with 31,924 annotations in 300 Ki-67 digital slide images. Whether the class predicted by DL-TC in the test set was correct compared with the annotation of ground truth at the pixel level was evaluated. Second, DL-TC- and DL-ND-assisted digital image analysis (DL-DIA) was performed in the other 194 luminal-type cases and correlations with manual counting and clinical outcome were investigated to confirm the accuracy and prognostic potential of DL-DIA. The performance of DL-TC was excellent and invasive carcinoma nests were well segmented from other elements (average precision: 0.851; recall: 0.878; F1-score: 0.858). Ki-67 index data and the number of nuclei from DL-DIA were positively correlated with data from manual counting (ρ = 0.961, and 0.928, respectively). High Ki-67 index (cutoff 20%) cases showed significantly worse recurrence-free survival and breast cancer-specific survival (P = 0.024, and 0.032, respectively).

Conclusion: The performances of DL-TC and DL-ND were excellent. DL-DIA demonstrated a high degree of concordance with manual counting of Ki-67 and the results of this approach have prognostic potential.

利用深度学习模型辅助数字图像分析评估乳腺癌中的 Ki-67
目的:通过定量评估人工智能模型的性能,测试人工智能(AI)辅助Ki-67数字图像分析在浸润性乳腺癌(IBC)中的疗效:本研究使用了494例IBC核心针活检的Ki-67玻片图像。方法分为两个步骤:(i) 构建深度学习模型(DL);(ii) 实现用于 Ki-67 分析的 DL。首先,利用 HALO AI DenseNet V2 算法构建了 DL 组织分类器模型(DL-TC)和 DL 核检测模型(DL-ND),对 300 张 Ki-67 数字切片图像中的 31,924 个注释进行了分析。评估了 DL-TC 在测试集中预测的类别与像素级地面实况注释相比是否正确。其次,对其他 194 个腔隙型病例进行了 DL-TC 和 DL-ND 辅助数字图像分析(DL-DIA),并研究了与人工计数和临床结果的相关性,以确认 DL-DIA 的准确性和预后潜力。DL-TC 的表现非常出色,能很好地将浸润性癌巢从其他元素中分割出来(平均精确度:0.851;召回率:0.878;F1-分数:0.858)。来自 DL-DIA 的 Ki-67 指数数据和细胞核数量与人工计数数据呈正相关(ρ = 0.961 和 0.928)。高 Ki-67 指数(临界值为 20%)病例的无复发生存率和乳腺癌特异性生存率明显较低(P = 0.024 和 0.032):结论:DL-TC 和 DL-ND 的表现非常出色。结论:DL-TC和DL-DIA的表现非常出色,DL-DIA与Ki-67的人工计数结果高度一致,该方法具有预后潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Histopathology
Histopathology 医学-病理学
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
4.70%
发文量
239
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Histopathology is an international journal intended to be of practical value to surgical and diagnostic histopathologists, and to investigators of human disease who employ histopathological methods. Our primary purpose is to publish advances in pathology, in particular those applicable to clinical practice and contributing to the better understanding of human disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信