Radiological evaluation of fusion patterns after Lateral Lumbar Interbody fusion with 3D-printed porous titanium cages vs. conventional titanium cages.
Calogero Velluto, Gregory Mundis, Laura Scaramuzzo, Andrea Perna, Giacomo Capece, Andrea Cruciani, Michele Inverso, Maria Ilaria Borruto, Luca Proietti
{"title":"Radiological evaluation of fusion patterns after Lateral Lumbar Interbody fusion with 3D-printed porous titanium cages vs. conventional titanium cages.","authors":"Calogero Velluto, Gregory Mundis, Laura Scaramuzzo, Andrea Perna, Giacomo Capece, Andrea Cruciani, Michele Inverso, Maria Ilaria Borruto, Luca Proietti","doi":"10.3389/fsurg.2024.1446792","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The assessment of segmental fusion after Lateral Lumbar Interbody fusion (LLIF) using 3D-printed porous titanium cage is still not well studied. Various criteria, such as the presence of bone bridges (BB) between adjacent vertebrae, serve as indicators for anterior fusion. However, limited radiological studies have investigated zygapophyseal joints (ZJ) status following LLIF with porous titanium cages vs. conventional titanium threaded cages. The porous design of the latest titanium intervertebral cages is thought to enhance the bone-to-implant fusion rate. This radiological study aimed to compare the fusion patterns post-LLIF using 3D-printed porous titanium cages against those using threaded titanium cages. This radiological study aimed to compare the fusion patterns after LLIF using 3D-printed porous titanium cages against those using threaded titanium cages.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This retrospective, single-center radiological study involved 135 patients who underwent LLIF and posterior percutaneous screw fixation for degenerative spondylolisthesis. The study included 51 patients (Group A) with the novel porous titanium cages and 84 patients (Group B) with conventional threaded titanium cages. Inclusion criteria mandated complete radiological data and a minimum follow-up period of 24 months. The study evaluated intervertebral bone bridges (BB) for anterior fusion and zygapophyseal joints (ZJ) ankylotic degeneration, based on Pathria et al., as evidence of posterior fusion and segmental immobilization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two years after surgery, intervertebral BB were identified in 83 segments (94.31%) in Group A and in 87 segments (88.77%) in Group B. ZJ Pathria grade I was observed in 2 segments (2.27%) of Group A and in 4 segments (4.08%) of Group B. Grade II was seen in 5 segments (5.68%) of Group A and in 6 segments (6.12%) of Group B. Posterior fusion, classified as grade III, was found in 81 segments (92.04%) of Group A and 88 segments (89.79%) of Group B. Subsidence incidence was 5.88% (3 segments) for the novel cage and 9.88% (8 segments) for the conventional cage.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The architecture of porous titanium cages offers a promising solution for increasing bone ingrowth and bridging space, supporting successful spinal fusion while minimizing the risk of subsidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":12564,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Surgery","volume":"11 ","pages":"1446792"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11518840/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2024.1446792","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: The assessment of segmental fusion after Lateral Lumbar Interbody fusion (LLIF) using 3D-printed porous titanium cage is still not well studied. Various criteria, such as the presence of bone bridges (BB) between adjacent vertebrae, serve as indicators for anterior fusion. However, limited radiological studies have investigated zygapophyseal joints (ZJ) status following LLIF with porous titanium cages vs. conventional titanium threaded cages. The porous design of the latest titanium intervertebral cages is thought to enhance the bone-to-implant fusion rate. This radiological study aimed to compare the fusion patterns post-LLIF using 3D-printed porous titanium cages against those using threaded titanium cages. This radiological study aimed to compare the fusion patterns after LLIF using 3D-printed porous titanium cages against those using threaded titanium cages.
Material and methods: This retrospective, single-center radiological study involved 135 patients who underwent LLIF and posterior percutaneous screw fixation for degenerative spondylolisthesis. The study included 51 patients (Group A) with the novel porous titanium cages and 84 patients (Group B) with conventional threaded titanium cages. Inclusion criteria mandated complete radiological data and a minimum follow-up period of 24 months. The study evaluated intervertebral bone bridges (BB) for anterior fusion and zygapophyseal joints (ZJ) ankylotic degeneration, based on Pathria et al., as evidence of posterior fusion and segmental immobilization.
Results: Two years after surgery, intervertebral BB were identified in 83 segments (94.31%) in Group A and in 87 segments (88.77%) in Group B. ZJ Pathria grade I was observed in 2 segments (2.27%) of Group A and in 4 segments (4.08%) of Group B. Grade II was seen in 5 segments (5.68%) of Group A and in 6 segments (6.12%) of Group B. Posterior fusion, classified as grade III, was found in 81 segments (92.04%) of Group A and 88 segments (89.79%) of Group B. Subsidence incidence was 5.88% (3 segments) for the novel cage and 9.88% (8 segments) for the conventional cage.
Conclusions: The architecture of porous titanium cages offers a promising solution for increasing bone ingrowth and bridging space, supporting successful spinal fusion while minimizing the risk of subsidence.
期刊介绍：
Evidence of surgical interventions go back to prehistoric times. Since then, the field of surgery has developed into a complex array of specialties and procedures, particularly with the advent of microsurgery, lasers and minimally invasive techniques. The advanced skills now required from surgeons has led to ever increasing specialization, though these still share important fundamental principles.
Frontiers in Surgery is the umbrella journal representing the publication interests of all surgical specialties. It is divided into several “Specialty Sections” listed below. All these sections have their own Specialty Chief Editor, Editorial Board and homepage, but all articles carry the citation Frontiers in Surgery.
Frontiers in Surgery calls upon medical professionals and scientists from all surgical specialties to publish their experimental and clinical studies in this journal. By assembling all surgical specialties, which nonetheless retain their independence, under the common umbrella of Frontiers in Surgery, a powerful publication venue is created. Since there is often overlap and common ground between the different surgical specialties, assembly of all surgical disciplines into a single journal will foster a collaborative dialogue amongst the surgical community. This means that publications, which are also of interest to other surgical specialties, will reach a wider audience and have greater impact.
The aim of this multidisciplinary journal is to create a discussion and knowledge platform of advances and research findings in surgical practice today to continuously improve clinical management of patients and foster innovation in this field.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
