Subclinical variability in visual function modulates visual dependence - independent of age.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Experimental Brain Research Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-29 DOI:10.1007/s00221-024-06940-6
Amir Saman Fathi, David Andrew Green
{"title":"Subclinical variability in visual function modulates visual dependence - independent of age.","authors":"Amir Saman Fathi, David Andrew Green","doi":"10.1007/s00221-024-06940-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Paradoxically visual dependence is reported to increase with age, contributing to falls risk, whereas visual function typically declines. This study assesses the relationship between age, objective and subjective measures of visual function and visual dependence, in healthy young and older adults. Forty-four healthy Young (YA; n = 32; 18 males, aged 26.2 ± 5.3 yrs.) and Older (OA; n = 12; 3 males, aged 62.4 ± 6.7 yrs.) adults were assessed for objective (visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, depth perception, and lower peripheral vision), and subjective visual function (VFQ-25) along with motion sickness susceptibility. Subjective Visual Vertical (SVV) and induced nausea and vection were assessed using the Rod and Disc Test (RDT). Groups were compared using Mann-Whitney U, whilst determinants of SVV variability were evaluated using Multiple regression modelling. Visual acuity (p < 0.01) and contrast sensitivity (p = 0.04) were lower in OA. Visual dependence (SVV tilt errors) was not associated with ageing (p = 0.46). YA experienced greater RDT-induced vection (p = 0.03). Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity accounted for modest proportions of variance in SVV tilt errors (VA; R<sup>2</sup> = 0.14, F(1,42) = 8.00, p < 0.01; β = 6.37) and (CS; R<sup>2</sup> = 0.06, F(1,42) = 3.93, p = 0.05; β = -4.97), respectively. Our findings suggest that subclinical differences in visual acuity and contrast sensitivity contribute to SVV tilt error variability, among both healthy young and older adults. Further studies are needed to define the inter-relationship between age-related visual function, non-visual factors (including vestibular and somatosensory fidelity, activity levels, fear of falling and cognitive function) and visual dependence.</p>","PeriodicalId":12268,"journal":{"name":"Experimental Brain Research","volume":" ","pages":"2827-2837"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11569020/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental Brain Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-024-06940-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Paradoxically visual dependence is reported to increase with age, contributing to falls risk, whereas visual function typically declines. This study assesses the relationship between age, objective and subjective measures of visual function and visual dependence, in healthy young and older adults. Forty-four healthy Young (YA; n = 32; 18 males, aged 26.2 ± 5.3 yrs.) and Older (OA; n = 12; 3 males, aged 62.4 ± 6.7 yrs.) adults were assessed for objective (visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, depth perception, and lower peripheral vision), and subjective visual function (VFQ-25) along with motion sickness susceptibility. Subjective Visual Vertical (SVV) and induced nausea and vection were assessed using the Rod and Disc Test (RDT). Groups were compared using Mann-Whitney U, whilst determinants of SVV variability were evaluated using Multiple regression modelling. Visual acuity (p < 0.01) and contrast sensitivity (p = 0.04) were lower in OA. Visual dependence (SVV tilt errors) was not associated with ageing (p = 0.46). YA experienced greater RDT-induced vection (p = 0.03). Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity accounted for modest proportions of variance in SVV tilt errors (VA; R2 = 0.14, F(1,42) = 8.00, p < 0.01; β = 6.37) and (CS; R2 = 0.06, F(1,42) = 3.93, p = 0.05; β = -4.97), respectively. Our findings suggest that subclinical differences in visual acuity and contrast sensitivity contribute to SVV tilt error variability, among both healthy young and older adults. Further studies are needed to define the inter-relationship between age-related visual function, non-visual factors (including vestibular and somatosensory fidelity, activity levels, fear of falling and cognitive function) and visual dependence.

视觉功能的亚临床变异调节视觉依赖性--与年龄无关。
据报道,随着年龄的增长,视觉依赖性会增加,从而导致跌倒风险,而视觉功能通常会下降。本研究评估了健康的年轻人和老年人的年龄、视觉功能的客观和主观测量值以及视觉依赖性之间的关系。研究人员对 44 名健康的年轻人(YA;n = 32;18 名男性,年龄为 26.2 ± 5.3 岁)和老年人(OA;n = 12;3 名男性,年龄为 62.4 ± 6.7 岁)进行了客观(视敏度、对比敏感度、深度知觉和下周边视力)和主观视觉功能(VFQ-25)以及晕动病易感性的评估。主观视觉垂直度(SVV)以及诱发的恶心和呕吐采用棒盘试验(RDT)进行评估。使用 Mann-Whitney U 对各组进行比较,同时使用多元回归模型对 SVV 变异的决定因素进行评估。视力(分别为 p 2 = 0.14, F(1,42) = 8.00, p 2 = 0.06, F(1,42) = 3.93, p = 0.05; β = -4.97)。我们的研究结果表明,无论是健康的年轻人还是老年人,视力和对比敏感度的亚临床差异都会导致 SVV 倾斜误差的变化。还需要进一步的研究来确定与年龄相关的视觉功能、非视觉因素(包括前庭和体感保真度、活动水平、跌倒恐惧和认知功能)和视觉依赖之间的相互关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
228
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Founded in 1966, Experimental Brain Research publishes original contributions on many aspects of experimental research of the central and peripheral nervous system. The focus is on molecular, physiology, behavior, neurochemistry, developmental, cellular and molecular neurobiology, and experimental pathology relevant to general problems of cerebral function. The journal publishes original papers, reviews, and mini-reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信