The impact of a multidisciplinary team approach on the management of patients diagnosed with complex colorectal polyps.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Clare Westwood, David Beaton, Iosif Beintaris, John Jacob, Kevin Etherson, Ravi Ranjan, Matthew D Rutter
{"title":"The impact of a multidisciplinary team approach on the management of patients diagnosed with complex colorectal polyps.","authors":"Clare Westwood, David Beaton, Iosif Beintaris, John Jacob, Kevin Etherson, Ravi Ranjan, Matthew D Rutter","doi":"10.1111/codi.17213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Large nonpedunculated colorectal polyps (LNPCPs) have a greater than average risk of malignancy, incomplete resection/recurrence and complications associated with treatment. Appropriate management of these lesions is crucial to prevent cancer and reduce harm. The British Society of Gastroenterologists (BSG) and the Association of Coloproctologists of Great Britain and Ireland (ACPGBI) published guidelines for the management of LNPCPs in 2015. The aim of this work was to evaluate the case mix and outcomes from a single centre's multidisciplinary approach to managing such lesions against the key performance indicators (KPIs) set within these national guidelines.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Cohort study from a single centre over a 2-year period, January 2020 to December 2022.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After exclusions, a total of 229 cases were discussed. Most complex polyps were treated endoscopically, with conservative management recommended in 22 cases where patients had significant comorbidities and were unlikely to benefit from therapy. The overall surgical intervention rate (including transanal endoscopic microsurgery/per anal excision) was 14%. Of the cases treated endoscopically, there was residual polyp detected in 3.9% at 12-months' follow-up. Complications were rare. There was a single case of perforation following endoscopic submucosal dissection and no significant postprocedure bleeds. There were no perforations following endoscopic mucosal resection, although postpolypectomy bleeding requiring admission occurred in 4%. Sixty-eight per cent of patients were treated within 56 days of multidisciplinary team (MDT) discussion, despite the timeframe being within a period of huge disruption due to the global COVID pandemic. KPI standards published by the BSG were therefore met.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MDT management of complex polyps (LNPCPs) is effective and meets the standards set by national guidance. Patient outcomes following treatment for complex polypectomy are improved when the most appropriate procedure is performed by the most appropriate operator. Discussion at a complex polyp MDT can facilitate this approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":10512,"journal":{"name":"Colorectal Disease","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Colorectal Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.17213","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: Large nonpedunculated colorectal polyps (LNPCPs) have a greater than average risk of malignancy, incomplete resection/recurrence and complications associated with treatment. Appropriate management of these lesions is crucial to prevent cancer and reduce harm. The British Society of Gastroenterologists (BSG) and the Association of Coloproctologists of Great Britain and Ireland (ACPGBI) published guidelines for the management of LNPCPs in 2015. The aim of this work was to evaluate the case mix and outcomes from a single centre's multidisciplinary approach to managing such lesions against the key performance indicators (KPIs) set within these national guidelines.

Method: Cohort study from a single centre over a 2-year period, January 2020 to December 2022.

Results: After exclusions, a total of 229 cases were discussed. Most complex polyps were treated endoscopically, with conservative management recommended in 22 cases where patients had significant comorbidities and were unlikely to benefit from therapy. The overall surgical intervention rate (including transanal endoscopic microsurgery/per anal excision) was 14%. Of the cases treated endoscopically, there was residual polyp detected in 3.9% at 12-months' follow-up. Complications were rare. There was a single case of perforation following endoscopic submucosal dissection and no significant postprocedure bleeds. There were no perforations following endoscopic mucosal resection, although postpolypectomy bleeding requiring admission occurred in 4%. Sixty-eight per cent of patients were treated within 56 days of multidisciplinary team (MDT) discussion, despite the timeframe being within a period of huge disruption due to the global COVID pandemic. KPI standards published by the BSG were therefore met.

Conclusion: MDT management of complex polyps (LNPCPs) is effective and meets the standards set by national guidance. Patient outcomes following treatment for complex polypectomy are improved when the most appropriate procedure is performed by the most appropriate operator. Discussion at a complex polyp MDT can facilitate this approach.

多学科团队方法对复杂结直肠息肉患者管理的影响。
目的:大的无瘘管结直肠息肉(LNPCPs)发生恶性肿瘤、不完全切除/复发以及与治疗相关的并发症的风险高于平均水平。适当处理这些病变对于预防癌症和减少伤害至关重要。英国胃肠病学家协会(BSG)和大不列颠及爱尔兰结肠直肠病学家协会(ACPGBI)于 2015 年发布了 LNPCPs 管理指南。这项工作的目的是根据这些国家指南中设定的关键绩效指标(KPI),评估单个中心采用多学科方法管理此类病变的病例组合和结果:方法:在2020年1月至2022年12月的两年时间内,对一个单一中心进行队列研究:结果:经排除后,共讨论了 229 个病例。大多数复杂息肉都在内镜下进行了治疗,有22例患者合并症严重,不太可能从治疗中获益,因此建议采取保守治疗。总体手术干预率(包括经肛门内窥镜显微手术/肛门切除术)为 14%。在接受内窥镜治疗的病例中,有3.9%在12个月的随访中发现有息肉残留。并发症很少发生。内镜粘膜下剥离术后有一例穿孔,术后无明显出血。内镜粘膜切除术后没有穿孔,但有4%的患者在切除术后出血,需要入院治疗。68%的患者在多学科团队(MDT)讨论后的56天内接受了治疗,尽管当时正值全球COVID大流行造成巨大混乱的时期。因此达到了 BSG 公布的 KPI 标准:复杂息肉(LNPCPs)的 MDT 管理是有效的,符合国家指南规定的标准。如果由最合适的操作人员实施最合适的手术,复杂息肉切除术治疗后的患者预后会得到改善。复杂息肉 MDT 讨论可促进这种方法的实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Colorectal Disease
Colorectal Disease 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
11.80%
发文量
406
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: Diseases of the colon and rectum are common and offer a number of exciting challenges. Clinical, diagnostic and basic science research is expanding rapidly. There is increasing demand from purchasers of health care and patients for clinicians to keep abreast of the latest research and developments, and to translate these into routine practice. Technological advances in diagnosis, surgical technique, new pharmaceuticals, molecular genetics and other basic sciences have transformed many aspects of how these diseases are managed. Such progress will accelerate. Colorectal Disease offers a real benefit to subscribers and authors. It is first and foremost a vehicle for publishing original research relating to the demanding, rapidly expanding field of colorectal diseases. Essential for surgeons, pathologists, oncologists, gastroenterologists and health professionals caring for patients with a disease of the lower GI tract, Colorectal Disease furthers education and inter-professional development by including regular review articles and discussions of current controversies. Note that the journal does not usually accept paediatric surgical papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信