Validation of the 2018 (New) ENMC Classification Criteria for Dermatomyositis in Chinese Patients with Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathies.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 RHEUMATOLOGY
Puli Zhang, Chao Sun, Qinglin Peng, Wei Jiang, Xiaolan Tian, Ying Li, Zhen Cao, Guochun Wang, Wei Qiao, Xin Lu
{"title":"Validation of the 2018 (New) ENMC Classification Criteria for Dermatomyositis in Chinese Patients with Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathies.","authors":"Puli Zhang, Chao Sun, Qinglin Peng, Wei Jiang, Xiaolan Tian, Ying Li, Zhen Cao, Guochun Wang, Wei Qiao, Xin Lu","doi":"10.1007/s10067-024-07178-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To validate the 2018 European Neuromuscular Centre classification (ENMC) criteria, compare its performance to the 1975 Bohan & Peter (B&P) and 2017 European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology (EULAR/ACR) criteria for dermatomyositis (DM), and describe characteristics of different myositis-specific autoantibody (MSA)-positive patients defined by the ENMC-DM criteria.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Medical records and data on MSAs and muscle biopsies were retrospectively obtained from 1370 Chinese patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM) between 2008 and 2020. Patients were diagnosed with DM by at least two rheumatologists and classified according to the ENMC-DM, EULAR/ACR, and B&P criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 1370 patients, 857, 671, 693, and 913 were diagnosed with DM using the specialists' gold standard, ENMC-DM, EULAR/ACR, and B&P criteria, respectively. Significant between-group differences were observed in the clinical symptoms, serum creatine kinase levels, and MSAs (P < 0.05). Based on muscle biopsy data, the B&P criteria had the highest sensitivity (94%) but lowest specificity (65%). Without muscle biopsy data, the ENMC-DM criteria had the highest specificity (92%) but lowest sensitivity (61%). The sensitivity and specificity of the EULAR/ACR criteria were intermediate (72% and 86%, respectively) regardless of muscle biopsy data availability. With MSA data, the sensitivity and specificity of the ENMC-DM criteria were 73% and 91% and increased to 76% and 97%, respectively, with both muscle biopsy and MSA data.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The ENMC-DM criteria had higher specificity than the other criteria, especially in the absence of muscle biopsy data. Sensitivity and specificity improved when both muscle biopsy and MSA data were available. Key Points • Idiopathic inflammatory myopathy presents diagnostic challenges due to its variable features and dermatomyositis has distinct subtypes based on myositis-specific autoantibodies (MSAs) with unique clinical phenotypes. • This study validates the ENMC-DM criteria in Chinese patients and provides a comprehensive comparison with the B&P and EULAR/ACR criteria. • It demonstrates that the new ENMC-DM criteria exhibit higher specificity, especially noteworthy in cases without muscle biopsy, and the study further highlights the improved sensitivity and specificity when combining muscle biopsy and MSAs, offering a refined approach for accurate DM classification.</p>","PeriodicalId":10482,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Rheumatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-024-07178-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To validate the 2018 European Neuromuscular Centre classification (ENMC) criteria, compare its performance to the 1975 Bohan & Peter (B&P) and 2017 European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology (EULAR/ACR) criteria for dermatomyositis (DM), and describe characteristics of different myositis-specific autoantibody (MSA)-positive patients defined by the ENMC-DM criteria.

Methods: Medical records and data on MSAs and muscle biopsies were retrospectively obtained from 1370 Chinese patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM) between 2008 and 2020. Patients were diagnosed with DM by at least two rheumatologists and classified according to the ENMC-DM, EULAR/ACR, and B&P criteria.

Results: Of the 1370 patients, 857, 671, 693, and 913 were diagnosed with DM using the specialists' gold standard, ENMC-DM, EULAR/ACR, and B&P criteria, respectively. Significant between-group differences were observed in the clinical symptoms, serum creatine kinase levels, and MSAs (P < 0.05). Based on muscle biopsy data, the B&P criteria had the highest sensitivity (94%) but lowest specificity (65%). Without muscle biopsy data, the ENMC-DM criteria had the highest specificity (92%) but lowest sensitivity (61%). The sensitivity and specificity of the EULAR/ACR criteria were intermediate (72% and 86%, respectively) regardless of muscle biopsy data availability. With MSA data, the sensitivity and specificity of the ENMC-DM criteria were 73% and 91% and increased to 76% and 97%, respectively, with both muscle biopsy and MSA data.

Conclusions: The ENMC-DM criteria had higher specificity than the other criteria, especially in the absence of muscle biopsy data. Sensitivity and specificity improved when both muscle biopsy and MSA data were available. Key Points • Idiopathic inflammatory myopathy presents diagnostic challenges due to its variable features and dermatomyositis has distinct subtypes based on myositis-specific autoantibodies (MSAs) with unique clinical phenotypes. • This study validates the ENMC-DM criteria in Chinese patients and provides a comprehensive comparison with the B&P and EULAR/ACR criteria. • It demonstrates that the new ENMC-DM criteria exhibit higher specificity, especially noteworthy in cases without muscle biopsy, and the study further highlights the improved sensitivity and specificity when combining muscle biopsy and MSAs, offering a refined approach for accurate DM classification.

2018年(新)ENMC皮肌炎分类标准在中国特发性炎症性肌病患者中的验证。
目的:验证2018年欧洲神经肌肉中心分类(ENMC)标准,将其与1975年Bohan & Peter(B&P)和2017年欧洲抗风湿联盟/美国风湿病学会(EULAR/ACR)皮肌炎(DM)标准进行比较,并描述ENMC-DM标准定义的不同肌炎特异性自身抗体(MSA)阳性患者的特征:回顾性收集了2008年至2020年间1370名中国特发性炎症性肌病(IIM)患者的病历、MSA和肌肉活检数据。患者至少由两名风湿病学家诊断为DM,并根据ENMC-DM、EULAR/ACR和B&P标准进行分类:结果:在 1370 名患者中,分别有 857 人、671 人、693 人和 913 人根据专家金标准、ENMC-DM、EULAR/ACR 和 B&P 标准被诊断为 DM。在临床症状、血清肌酸激酶水平和 MSAs 方面,观察到了显著的组间差异(P 结论):ENMC-DM标准的特异性高于其他标准,尤其是在缺乏肌肉活检数据的情况下。当同时获得肌肉活检和 MSA 数据时,灵敏度和特异性均有所提高。要点 - 特发性炎症性肌病因其特征多变而给诊断带来挑战,皮肌炎根据肌炎特异性自身抗体(MSA)具有不同的亚型,其临床表型也各不相同。- 本研究在中国患者中验证了ENMC-DM标准,并与B&P和EULAR/ACR标准进行了全面比较。- 该研究还进一步强调了结合肌肉活检和MSA后灵敏度和特异性的提高,为准确的DM分类提供了一种完善的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Rheumatology
Clinical Rheumatology 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
2.90%
发文量
441
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Rheumatology is an international English-language journal devoted to publishing original clinical investigation and research in the general field of rheumatology with accent on clinical aspects at postgraduate level. The journal succeeds Acta Rheumatologica Belgica, originally founded in 1945 as the official journal of the Belgian Rheumatology Society. Clinical Rheumatology aims to cover all modern trends in clinical and experimental research as well as the management and evaluation of diagnostic and treatment procedures connected with the inflammatory, immunologic, metabolic, genetic and degenerative soft and hard connective tissue diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信