Spontaneous Retinal Reattachment following Multiple Vitreoretinal Interventions: Case Report.

IF 0.5 Q4 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Case Reports in Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2024-08-23 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1159/000540346
Nathan Nash Wise, Eric K Chin, David R P Almeida
{"title":"Spontaneous Retinal Reattachment following Multiple Vitreoretinal Interventions: Case Report.","authors":"Nathan Nash Wise, Eric K Chin, David R P Almeida","doi":"10.1159/000540346","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of the study was to document and analyze a rare case of spontaneous retinal reattachment in a patient after successive unsuccessful vitreoretinal surgeries and to explore potential mechanisms contributing to this unexpected outcome.</p><p><strong>Case presentation: </strong>A 61-year-old patient with a history of high myopia presented with a rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. After undergoing multiple vitreoretinal procedures, including pars plana vitrectomy with silicone oil tamponade, anatomical reattachment was not achieved, and the patient developed complex retinal detachment associated with myopic foveoschisis. Surprisingly, spontaneous reattachment of the retina was observed during routine follow-up. Comprehensive ocular examination, optical coherence tomography (OCT), and fundus autofluorescence imaging were utilized to confirm and document the retinal status. A thorough review of patient history, surgical reports, and postoperative imaging was performed to discern potential contributory factors. The patient's retina remained attached for 12 months after the last intervention without additional surgical or medical treatment. OCT images revealed normalization of retinal architecture with reestablishment of the foveal contour and partial recovery of visual acuity. No signs of proliferative vitreoretinopathy or other commonly associated complications were observed. Immunological assays and genetic testing ruled out systemic conditions that could predispose to spontaneous reattachment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This case represents a remarkable instance of spontaneous retinal reattachment without surgical intervention after multiple failed procedures. The mechanisms underlying this phenomenon remain speculative; however, they may involve delayed postoperative cellular proliferation and migration, subtle intraocular pressure changes, or unrecognized vitreous traction resolution. Further investigation into similar cases may provide insights into the natural history of retinal detachment and potential self-resolving dynamics, which could inform future therapeutic strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":9635,"journal":{"name":"Case Reports in Ophthalmology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11521428/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Case Reports in Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000540346","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of the study was to document and analyze a rare case of spontaneous retinal reattachment in a patient after successive unsuccessful vitreoretinal surgeries and to explore potential mechanisms contributing to this unexpected outcome.

Case presentation: A 61-year-old patient with a history of high myopia presented with a rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. After undergoing multiple vitreoretinal procedures, including pars plana vitrectomy with silicone oil tamponade, anatomical reattachment was not achieved, and the patient developed complex retinal detachment associated with myopic foveoschisis. Surprisingly, spontaneous reattachment of the retina was observed during routine follow-up. Comprehensive ocular examination, optical coherence tomography (OCT), and fundus autofluorescence imaging were utilized to confirm and document the retinal status. A thorough review of patient history, surgical reports, and postoperative imaging was performed to discern potential contributory factors. The patient's retina remained attached for 12 months after the last intervention without additional surgical or medical treatment. OCT images revealed normalization of retinal architecture with reestablishment of the foveal contour and partial recovery of visual acuity. No signs of proliferative vitreoretinopathy or other commonly associated complications were observed. Immunological assays and genetic testing ruled out systemic conditions that could predispose to spontaneous reattachment.

Conclusion: This case represents a remarkable instance of spontaneous retinal reattachment without surgical intervention after multiple failed procedures. The mechanisms underlying this phenomenon remain speculative; however, they may involve delayed postoperative cellular proliferation and migration, subtle intraocular pressure changes, or unrecognized vitreous traction resolution. Further investigation into similar cases may provide insights into the natural history of retinal detachment and potential self-resolving dynamics, which could inform future therapeutic strategies.

多次玻璃体视网膜介入治疗后的自发性视网膜重接:病例报告。
导言:本研究旨在记录和分析一例罕见的自发性视网膜再粘连病例,该患者在连续接受玻璃体视网膜手术失败后出现视网膜再粘连,并探讨导致这一意外结果的潜在机制:一名 61 岁的高度近视患者出现流变性视网膜脱离。在接受了多次玻璃体视网膜手术(包括平面旁玻璃体切除术和硅油填塞术)后,患者未能实现解剖学意义上的再粘连,而是出现了伴有近视眼窝裂孔的复杂性视网膜脱离。令人惊讶的是,在常规随访中观察到视网膜自发地重新附着。综合眼部检查、光学相干断层扫描(OCT)和眼底自动荧光成像被用来确认和记录视网膜状况。对患者病史、手术报告和术后成像进行了全面审查,以找出潜在的致病因素。在最后一次干预后的 12 个月里,患者的视网膜一直保持附着,没有接受额外的手术或药物治疗。OCT 图像显示视网膜结构恢复正常,眼窝轮廓重建,视力部分恢复。没有观察到增殖性玻璃体视网膜病变或其他常见并发症的迹象。免疫学检测和基因检测排除了可能导致自发性再粘连的全身性疾病:本病例是在多次手术失败后未经手术干预而发生自发性视网膜再粘连的罕见病例。这一现象的机制仍有待推测,但可能涉及术后细胞增殖和迁移延迟、微妙的眼压变化或未识别的玻璃体牵引消退。对类似病例的进一步调查可能会让人们了解视网膜脱离的自然史和潜在的自我解决动力学,从而为未来的治疗策略提供依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
129
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: This peer-reviewed online-only journal publishes original case reports covering the entire spectrum of ophthalmology, including prevention, diagnosis, treatment, toxicities of therapy, supportive care, quality-of-life, and survivorship issues. The submission of negative results is strongly encouraged. The journal will also accept case reports dealing with the use of novel technologies, both in the arena of diagnosis and treatment. Supplementary material is welcomed. The intent of the journal is to provide clinicians and researchers with a tool to disseminate their personal experiences to a wider public as well as to review interesting cases encountered by colleagues all over the world. Universally used terms can be searched across the entire growing collection of case reports, further facilitating the retrieval of specific information. Following the open access principle, the entire contents can be retrieved at no charge, guaranteeing easy access to this valuable source of anecdotal information at all times.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信