The THINC-it tool: temporal sensitivity to change over time.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Na Zhu, Jia Huang, YouSong Su, JingFang Lu, XiaoHui Wu, Lu Yang, Jun Chen, YiRu Fang
{"title":"The THINC-it tool: temporal sensitivity to change over time.","authors":"Na Zhu, Jia Huang, YouSong Su, JingFang Lu, XiaoHui Wu, Lu Yang, Jun Chen, YiRu Fang","doi":"10.1186/s12888-024-06170-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Cognitive dysfunction is believed to be among the core features of Bipolar Depression(BD-D). However, its evaluation and available treatments are limited. Here, we conducted a longitudinal follow-up clinical trial using the THINC-it tool to evaluate temporal sensitivity to change over time in cognitive function among patients with bipolar depression from a Chinese cohort. It is helpful to verify whether the scale can continuously and reliably measure cognitive function in different time points and reduce the measurement error caused by time factors. Hope our findings could provide insights into the significance of the THINC-it tool as an iterative clinical cognitive evaluation tool.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 120 patients with bipolar depression(40 males and 80 females, respectively) alongside 100 healthy controls(23 males and 77 females, respectively) were recruited in the study. All participants were interviewed for 8 weeks, using the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17) and the Young Mania Rating Scale(YMRS). The primary dependent measure was the previously validated THINC-it tool, followed by psychometric analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Repeated measures of the THINC-it tool at baseline, one-week, and eight-week periods were conducted after controlling for age, gender, and education effects. Results from the general linear model revealed no significant time differences in variances(P > 0.05). Similarly, adjusting for confounding factors (age, gender, education, and HAMD-17 scores), results from the longitudinal analysis showed that there were no significant differences in cognitive impairment over time(P > 0.05). However, we found significant differences between BD-D and Healthy Control(HC) groups with regards to Spotter, Codebreaker, Trails, Perceived Deficits Questionnaire for Depression-5-items(PDQ-5-D), and THINC-it Total composite(P < 0.05), but not in Symbol Check (p = 0.191).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings indicate that the THINC-it tool effectively detects sensitivity to change in groups and maintains stability at times, indicating that it is a feasible and reliable instrument for evaluating cognitive dysfunction in Chinese patients with bipolar depression.</p>","PeriodicalId":9029,"journal":{"name":"BMC Psychiatry","volume":"24 1","pages":"749"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11520385/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-024-06170-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Cognitive dysfunction is believed to be among the core features of Bipolar Depression(BD-D). However, its evaluation and available treatments are limited. Here, we conducted a longitudinal follow-up clinical trial using the THINC-it tool to evaluate temporal sensitivity to change over time in cognitive function among patients with bipolar depression from a Chinese cohort. It is helpful to verify whether the scale can continuously and reliably measure cognitive function in different time points and reduce the measurement error caused by time factors. Hope our findings could provide insights into the significance of the THINC-it tool as an iterative clinical cognitive evaluation tool.

Methods: A total of 120 patients with bipolar depression(40 males and 80 females, respectively) alongside 100 healthy controls(23 males and 77 females, respectively) were recruited in the study. All participants were interviewed for 8 weeks, using the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17) and the Young Mania Rating Scale(YMRS). The primary dependent measure was the previously validated THINC-it tool, followed by psychometric analysis.

Results: Repeated measures of the THINC-it tool at baseline, one-week, and eight-week periods were conducted after controlling for age, gender, and education effects. Results from the general linear model revealed no significant time differences in variances(P > 0.05). Similarly, adjusting for confounding factors (age, gender, education, and HAMD-17 scores), results from the longitudinal analysis showed that there were no significant differences in cognitive impairment over time(P > 0.05). However, we found significant differences between BD-D and Healthy Control(HC) groups with regards to Spotter, Codebreaker, Trails, Perceived Deficits Questionnaire for Depression-5-items(PDQ-5-D), and THINC-it Total composite(P < 0.05), but not in Symbol Check (p = 0.191).

Conclusion: These findings indicate that the THINC-it tool effectively detects sensitivity to change in groups and maintains stability at times, indicating that it is a feasible and reliable instrument for evaluating cognitive dysfunction in Chinese patients with bipolar depression.

THINC-it 工具:对随时间变化的时间敏感性。
简介:认知功能障碍被认为是双相抑郁症(BD-D)的核心特征之一:认知功能障碍被认为是双相抑郁症(BD-D)的核心特征之一。然而,对其进行的评估和可用的治疗方法都很有限。在此,我们使用 THINC-it 工具进行了一项纵向随访临床试验,以评估中国双相抑郁症患者认知功能随时间变化的时间敏感性。这有助于验证该量表能否连续、可靠地测量不同时间点的认知功能,并减少因时间因素造成的测量误差。希望我们的研究结果能为THINC-it工具作为迭代式临床认知评估工具的意义提供启示:研究共招募了 120 名双相抑郁症患者(男性 40 名,女性 80 名)和 100 名健康对照者(男性 23 名,女性 77 名)。所有参与者均接受了为期 8 周的访谈,访谈中使用了 17 项汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表(HAMD-17)和青年躁狂评定量表(YMRS)。主要的因果测量是之前验证过的 THINC-it 工具,然后进行心理测量分析:在控制了年龄、性别和教育的影响后,对 THINC-it 工具进行了基线、一周和八周的重复测量。一般线性模型的结果显示,各时间段的差异并不显著(P > 0.05)。同样,在对混杂因素(年龄、性别、教育程度和 HAMD-17 评分)进行调整后,纵向分析的结果显示,认知障碍随时间的变化没有显著差异(P > 0.05)。然而,我们发现 BD-D 组与健康对照(HC)组在 Spotter、Codebreaker、Trails、Perceived Deficits Questionnaire for Depression-5-items (PDQ-5-D) 和 THINC-it Total composite(P 结论)方面存在显著差异:这些研究结果表明,THINC-it工具能有效检测群体变化的敏感性,并在某些时候保持稳定,表明它是评估中国双相抑郁患者认知功能障碍的一种可行且可靠的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Psychiatry
BMC Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
716
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Psychiatry is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of psychiatric disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信