Sijing Chen, Yanhong Sun, Fengyu Zhang, Chunxiong Luo
{"title":"Dynamic processes of fate decision in inducible bistable systems.","authors":"Sijing Chen, Yanhong Sun, Fengyu Zhang, Chunxiong Luo","doi":"10.1016/j.bpj.2024.10.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The process of biological fate decision regulated by gene regulatory networks involves numerous complex dynamical interactions among many components. Mathematical modeling typically employed ordinary differential equations and steady-state analysis, which has yielded valuable quantitative insights. However, stable states predicted by theoretical models often fail to capture transient or metastable phenomena that occur during most observation periods in experimental or real biological systems. We attribute this discrepancy to the omission of dynamic processes of various complex interactions. Here, we demonstrate the influence of delays in gene regulatory steps and the timescales of the external induction on the dynamic processes of the fate decision in inducible bistable systems. We propose that steady-state parameters determine the landscape of fate decision. However, during the dynamic evolution along the landscape, the unequal delays of biochemical interactions as well as the timescale of external induction cause deviations in the differentiation trajectories, leading to the formation of new transient distributions that persist long term. Our findings emphasize the importance of considering dynamic processes in fate decision instead of relying solely on steady-state analysis. We provide insights into the interpretation of experimental phenomena and offer valuable guidance for future efforts in dynamical modeling and synthetic biology design.</p>","PeriodicalId":8922,"journal":{"name":"Biophysical journal","volume":" ","pages":"4030-4041"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11628857/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biophysical journal","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2024.10.015","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The process of biological fate decision regulated by gene regulatory networks involves numerous complex dynamical interactions among many components. Mathematical modeling typically employed ordinary differential equations and steady-state analysis, which has yielded valuable quantitative insights. However, stable states predicted by theoretical models often fail to capture transient or metastable phenomena that occur during most observation periods in experimental or real biological systems. We attribute this discrepancy to the omission of dynamic processes of various complex interactions. Here, we demonstrate the influence of delays in gene regulatory steps and the timescales of the external induction on the dynamic processes of the fate decision in inducible bistable systems. We propose that steady-state parameters determine the landscape of fate decision. However, during the dynamic evolution along the landscape, the unequal delays of biochemical interactions as well as the timescale of external induction cause deviations in the differentiation trajectories, leading to the formation of new transient distributions that persist long term. Our findings emphasize the importance of considering dynamic processes in fate decision instead of relying solely on steady-state analysis. We provide insights into the interpretation of experimental phenomena and offer valuable guidance for future efforts in dynamical modeling and synthetic biology design.
期刊介绍:
BJ publishes original articles, letters, and perspectives on important problems in modern biophysics. The papers should be written so as to be of interest to a broad community of biophysicists. BJ welcomes experimental studies that employ quantitative physical approaches for the study of biological systems, including or spanning scales from molecule to whole organism. Experimental studies of a purely descriptive or phenomenological nature, with no theoretical or mechanistic underpinning, are not appropriate for publication in BJ. Theoretical studies should offer new insights into the understanding ofexperimental results or suggest new experimentally testable hypotheses. Articles reporting significant methodological or technological advances, which have potential to open new areas of biophysical investigation, are also suitable for publication in BJ. Papers describing improvements in accuracy or speed of existing methods or extra detail within methods described previously are not suitable for BJ.