Examining dermatology residency applicant profiles for the 2023–2024 cycle: a cross-sectional analysis

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY
Helana Ghali, Logan R. Smith, Kayla Rubalsky, Jaclyn Abraham, Veena Jajoo, Rahul Mhaskar, Basil S. Cherpelis, Sharon E. Albers
{"title":"Examining dermatology residency applicant profiles for the 2023–2024 cycle: a cross-sectional analysis","authors":"Helana Ghali,&nbsp;Logan R. Smith,&nbsp;Kayla Rubalsky,&nbsp;Jaclyn Abraham,&nbsp;Veena Jajoo,&nbsp;Rahul Mhaskar,&nbsp;Basil S. Cherpelis,&nbsp;Sharon E. Albers","doi":"10.1007/s00403-024-03470-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Dermatology remains highly competitive, with strong USMLE Step 1 scores traditionally crucial for securing residency positions. The 2023–2024 cycle introduced significant changes, including pass/fail USMLE Step 1 score reports and an expanded program signaling system. This study explores dermatology residency applicant profiles within this new context. A survey of 2023–2024 dermatology applicants was conducted via social media to gather demographic and application data. A total of 63 survey responses were collected: 74.6% matched and 25.4% unmatched. The racial distribution was 54% White/Caucasian, 25.4% Asian/Pacific Islander, 9.5% Black/African American, 4.8% Hispanic/Latino, and 6.3% other. The median USMLE Step 2 score was 257 (215–277). Racial differences in USMLE Step 2 scores were significant (<i>P</i> = 0.031), but did not affect match rates (<i>P</i> = 0.116). Letters of recommendation from dermatology program directors were linked to lower match rates (<i>P</i> = 0.036). A positive correlation was found between the number of audition rotations completed and matching at such programs (r²=0.817). Of all matched respondents, 46.8% matched to a program they did not signal; of these, 50.0% matched to a program at which they completed an audition rotation and 40.9% to their home dermatology program affiliation. The mean number of interviews was 8.02, with matched applicants receiving more invitations than unmatched applicants (9.02 vs. 5.06, <i>P</i> = 0.002). The shift to pass/fail USMLE Step 1 scores and expanded program signaling did not notably affect the median USMLE Step 2 score from prior years or match rates among underrepresented minorities. Success in matching continues to depend on a holistic evaluation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8203,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Dermatological Research","volume":"316 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Dermatological Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00403-024-03470-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dermatology remains highly competitive, with strong USMLE Step 1 scores traditionally crucial for securing residency positions. The 2023–2024 cycle introduced significant changes, including pass/fail USMLE Step 1 score reports and an expanded program signaling system. This study explores dermatology residency applicant profiles within this new context. A survey of 2023–2024 dermatology applicants was conducted via social media to gather demographic and application data. A total of 63 survey responses were collected: 74.6% matched and 25.4% unmatched. The racial distribution was 54% White/Caucasian, 25.4% Asian/Pacific Islander, 9.5% Black/African American, 4.8% Hispanic/Latino, and 6.3% other. The median USMLE Step 2 score was 257 (215–277). Racial differences in USMLE Step 2 scores were significant (P = 0.031), but did not affect match rates (P = 0.116). Letters of recommendation from dermatology program directors were linked to lower match rates (P = 0.036). A positive correlation was found between the number of audition rotations completed and matching at such programs (r²=0.817). Of all matched respondents, 46.8% matched to a program they did not signal; of these, 50.0% matched to a program at which they completed an audition rotation and 40.9% to their home dermatology program affiliation. The mean number of interviews was 8.02, with matched applicants receiving more invitations than unmatched applicants (9.02 vs. 5.06, P = 0.002). The shift to pass/fail USMLE Step 1 scores and expanded program signaling did not notably affect the median USMLE Step 2 score from prior years or match rates among underrepresented minorities. Success in matching continues to depend on a holistic evaluation.

研究 2023-2024 年周期皮肤科住院医师申请者概况:横断面分析。
皮肤科的竞争仍然非常激烈,USMLE 第 1 步的优异成绩历来是获得住院医师职位的关键。2023-2024 年周期引入了重大变化,包括通过/未通过 USMLE 第 1 步分数报告和扩大的项目信号系统。本研究探讨了在这一新背景下皮肤科住院医师申请者的概况。通过社交媒体对 2023-2024 年皮肤科申请者进行了调查,以收集人口统计学和申请数据。共收集到 63 份调查回复:74.6% 匹配,25.4% 不匹配。种族分布为:54% 白人/高加索人、25.4% 亚洲人/太平洋岛民、9.5% 黑人/非洲裔美国人、4.8% 西班牙裔/拉丁美洲人和 6.3% 其他。USMLE 第 2 步分数的中位数为 257 分(215-277)。USMLE Step 2 分数的种族差异显著(P = 0.031),但不影响匹配率(P = 0.116)。皮肤科项目主任的推荐信与较低的匹配率有关(P = 0.036)。已完成的试听轮转次数与此类项目的匹配率之间存在正相关关系(r²=0.817)。在所有匹配的受访者中,46.8% 的人匹配到了他们没有发出信号的专业;其中 50.0% 的人匹配到了他们完成试讲轮转的专业,40.9% 的人匹配到了他们所在的皮肤科专业。面试的平均次数为 8.02 次,匹配的申请人比未匹配的申请人收到更多的邀请(9.02 对 5.06,P = 0.002)。USMLE 第 1 步成绩改为及格/不及格以及项目信号的扩大并未明显影响往年的 USMLE 第 2 步成绩中位数或少数族裔的匹配率。匹配成功与否仍然取决于整体评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
3.30%
发文量
30
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Archives of Dermatological Research is a highly rated international journal that publishes original contributions in the field of experimental dermatology, including papers on biochemistry, morphology and immunology of the skin. The journal is among the few not related to dermatological associations or belonging to respective societies which guarantees complete independence. This English-language journal also offers a platform for review articles in areas of interest for dermatologists and for publication of innovative clinical trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信