Mucilage facilitates root water uptake under edaphic stress: first evidence at the plant scale.

IF 3.6 2区 生物学 Q1 PLANT SCIENCES
Mohanned Abdalla, Andrea Carminati, Gaochao Cai, Mutez Ali Ahmed
{"title":"Mucilage facilitates root water uptake under edaphic stress: first evidence at the plant scale.","authors":"Mohanned Abdalla, Andrea Carminati, Gaochao Cai, Mutez Ali Ahmed","doi":"10.1093/aob/mcae193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Mucilage has been hypothesized to soften the gradients in matric potential at the root-soil interface, hereby facilitating root water uptake in dry soils and maintaining transpiration with a moderate decline in leaf water potential. So far, this hypothesis has been tested only through simplified experiments and numerical simulations. However, the impact of mucilage on the relationship between transpiration rate (E) and leaf water potential (ψleaf) at the plant scale remains speculative.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We utilized an automated root pressure chamber to measure the E(ψleaf) relationship in two cowpea genotypes with contrasting mucilage production. We then leveraged a soil-plant hydraulic model to reproduce the experimental observations and inferred the matric potential at the root-soil interface for both genotypes.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>In wet soil, the relationship between the leaf water potential and transpiration rate (E) was linear for both genotypes. However, as the soil progressively dried, the E(ψleaf) relationship exhibited nonlinearity. Genotype with low mucilage production exhibited nonlinearity earlier during soil drying, i.e. in wetter soil conditions, (soil water content < 0.36 cm3 cm-3) compared to Genotype with high mucilage production (soil water content < 0.30 cm3 cm-3). The incidence of nonlinearity was concomitant with the decline in matric potential across the rhizosphere. High mucilage production attenuated water potential diminution at the root-soil interface with increased E. This shows, for the first time at the plant scale, that root mucilage softened the gradients in matric potential and maintained transpiration in drying soils. The model simulations indicate that a plausible explanation for this effect is an enhanced hydraulic conductivity of the rhizosphere in genotype with higher mucilage production.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Mucilage exudation maintains the hydraulic continuity between soil and roots and decelerates the drop in matric potential near the root surface, hereby postponing the hydraulic limitations to transpiration during soil drying.</p>","PeriodicalId":8023,"journal":{"name":"Annals of botany","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of botany","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcae193","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: Mucilage has been hypothesized to soften the gradients in matric potential at the root-soil interface, hereby facilitating root water uptake in dry soils and maintaining transpiration with a moderate decline in leaf water potential. So far, this hypothesis has been tested only through simplified experiments and numerical simulations. However, the impact of mucilage on the relationship between transpiration rate (E) and leaf water potential (ψleaf) at the plant scale remains speculative.

Methods: We utilized an automated root pressure chamber to measure the E(ψleaf) relationship in two cowpea genotypes with contrasting mucilage production. We then leveraged a soil-plant hydraulic model to reproduce the experimental observations and inferred the matric potential at the root-soil interface for both genotypes.

Key results: In wet soil, the relationship between the leaf water potential and transpiration rate (E) was linear for both genotypes. However, as the soil progressively dried, the E(ψleaf) relationship exhibited nonlinearity. Genotype with low mucilage production exhibited nonlinearity earlier during soil drying, i.e. in wetter soil conditions, (soil water content < 0.36 cm3 cm-3) compared to Genotype with high mucilage production (soil water content < 0.30 cm3 cm-3). The incidence of nonlinearity was concomitant with the decline in matric potential across the rhizosphere. High mucilage production attenuated water potential diminution at the root-soil interface with increased E. This shows, for the first time at the plant scale, that root mucilage softened the gradients in matric potential and maintained transpiration in drying soils. The model simulations indicate that a plausible explanation for this effect is an enhanced hydraulic conductivity of the rhizosphere in genotype with higher mucilage production.

Conclusions: Mucilage exudation maintains the hydraulic continuity between soil and roots and decelerates the drop in matric potential near the root surface, hereby postponing the hydraulic limitations to transpiration during soil drying.

黏液促进根系在水土压力下吸收水分:植物尺度上的首个证据。
背景和目的:据推测,黏液能软化根-土界面的水势梯度,从而促进根系在干燥土壤中的吸水,并在叶片水势适度下降的情况下维持蒸腾作用。迄今为止,这一假设只通过简化实验和数值模拟得到了验证。然而,在植物尺度上,粘液对蒸腾速率(E)和叶片水势(ψleaf)之间关系的影响仍然是推测性的:我们利用自动根压室测量了两种豇豆基因型的蒸腾速率(E)与叶片水势(ψleaf)之间的关系,这两种基因型的粘液产量截然不同。然后,我们利用土壤-植物水力模型重现了实验观测结果,并推断出了两种基因型根-土界面的母质势:主要结果:在潮湿的土壤中,两种基因型的叶片水势与蒸腾速率(E)之间呈线性关系。然而,随着土壤逐渐干燥,E(ψ叶)关系表现出非线性。与粘液产量高的基因型(土壤含水量< 0.30 cm3 cm-3)相比,粘液产量低的基因型在土壤干燥过程中,即在较湿的土壤条件下(土壤含水量< 0.36 cm3 cm-3),更早表现出非线性。非线性现象的出现与整个根瘤层中母质电位的下降有关。这首次在植物尺度上表明,根部粘液软化了母质势梯度,维持了干燥土壤的蒸腾作用。模型模拟表明,这种效应的一个合理解释是,粘液产量较高的基因型的根瘤层水力传导性增强:结论:粘液的渗出保持了土壤与根系之间的水力连续性,减缓了根系表面附近的水势下降,从而推迟了土壤干燥过程中对蒸腾的水力限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of botany
Annals of botany 生物-植物科学
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
4.80%
发文量
138
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Annals of Botany is an international plant science journal publishing novel and rigorous research in all areas of plant science. It is published monthly in both electronic and printed forms with at least two extra issues each year that focus on a particular theme in plant biology. The Journal is managed by the Annals of Botany Company, a not-for-profit educational charity established to promote plant science worldwide. The Journal publishes original research papers, invited and submitted review articles, ''Research in Context'' expanding on original work, ''Botanical Briefings'' as short overviews of important topics, and ''Viewpoints'' giving opinions. All papers in each issue are summarized briefly in Content Snapshots , there are topical news items in the Plant Cuttings section and Book Reviews . A rigorous review process ensures that readers are exposed to genuine and novel advances across a wide spectrum of botanical knowledge. All papers aim to advance knowledge and make a difference to our understanding of plant science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信