Late Survival Benefits of Concomitant Surgical Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation During Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Yosuke Sakurai, Toshiki Kuno, Yujiro Yokoyama, Tomohiro Fujisaki, Pranav Balakrishnan, Hisato Takagi, Tsuyoshi Kaneko
{"title":"Late Survival Benefits of Concomitant Surgical Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation During Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Yosuke Sakurai, Toshiki Kuno, Yujiro Yokoyama, Tomohiro Fujisaki, Pranav Balakrishnan, Hisato Takagi, Tsuyoshi Kaneko","doi":"10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.10.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The long-term survival benefits after surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) during cardiac surgery were not confirmed in previous randomized controlled trials or meta-analyses. This study aimed to investigate the long-term efficacy of surgical ablation in patients with AF. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL were searched to identify studies comparing concomitant surgical AF ablation with no surgical ablation during cardiac surgery. The primary outcome was long-term all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes were stroke, heart failure rehospitalization, major bleeding, freedom from AF, and permanent pacemaker implantation during follow-up. To minimize confounding, only adjusted outcomes were used from observational studies. A total of 38 studies met the inclusion criteria. Of those, 9 randomized controlled trials and 15 observational studies with 41,678 patients (surgical ablation: n = 19,125; no surgical ablation: n = 22,553) were analyzed for all-cause mortality, with a weighted median follow-up of 62.0 months. Surgical ablation was associated with decreased risks of long-term mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 0.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.71 to 0.84), stroke (HR 0.60, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.76), heart failure rehospitalization (HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.87 to 0.96), and more freedom from AF during follow-up (relative risk 1.93, 95% CI 1.50 to 2.49), whereas surgical ablation was associated with a higher risk of permanent pacemaker implantation during follow-up (HR 1.35, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.77). There was no significant difference in major bleeding during follow-up between the 2 groups. In patients with AF who underwent cardiac surgery, surgical ablation was associated with decreased risks of long-term mortality, stroke, and heart failure rehospitalization compared with patients with untreated AF. Given that the survival benefits were predominantly observed in observational studies, further randomized trials are necessary to confirm these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.10.008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The long-term survival benefits after surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) during cardiac surgery were not confirmed in previous randomized controlled trials or meta-analyses. This study aimed to investigate the long-term efficacy of surgical ablation in patients with AF. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL were searched to identify studies comparing concomitant surgical AF ablation with no surgical ablation during cardiac surgery. The primary outcome was long-term all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes were stroke, heart failure rehospitalization, major bleeding, freedom from AF, and permanent pacemaker implantation during follow-up. To minimize confounding, only adjusted outcomes were used from observational studies. A total of 38 studies met the inclusion criteria. Of those, 9 randomized controlled trials and 15 observational studies with 41,678 patients (surgical ablation: n = 19,125; no surgical ablation: n = 22,553) were analyzed for all-cause mortality, with a weighted median follow-up of 62.0 months. Surgical ablation was associated with decreased risks of long-term mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 0.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.71 to 0.84), stroke (HR 0.60, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.76), heart failure rehospitalization (HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.87 to 0.96), and more freedom from AF during follow-up (relative risk 1.93, 95% CI 1.50 to 2.49), whereas surgical ablation was associated with a higher risk of permanent pacemaker implantation during follow-up (HR 1.35, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.77). There was no significant difference in major bleeding during follow-up between the 2 groups. In patients with AF who underwent cardiac surgery, surgical ablation was associated with decreased risks of long-term mortality, stroke, and heart failure rehospitalization compared with patients with untreated AF. Given that the survival benefits were predominantly observed in observational studies, further randomized trials are necessary to confirm these findings.

心脏手术期间心房颤动同期手术消融的晚期生存优势;系统性回顾和 Meta 分析。
以往的随机对照试验或荟萃分析均未证实在心脏手术中对心房颤动(房颤)进行手术消融后可获得长期生存。本研究旨在探讨手术消融对房颤患者的长期疗效。研究人员检索了 MEDLINE、EMBASE 和 CENTRAL,以确定在心脏手术期间同时进行房颤手术消融与不进行手术消融的比较研究。主要结果是长期全因死亡率。次要结果是中风、心衰再住院、大出血、无房颤和随访期间永久性起搏器植入。为尽量减少混杂因素,仅采用观察性研究的调整后结果。共有 38 项研究符合纳入标准。其中,9 项研究性临床试验和 15 项观察性研究对 41,678 名患者(手术消融,n=19,125;无手术消融,n=22,553)的全因死亡率进行了分析,加权中位随访时间为 62.0 个月。手术消融与长期死亡率(危险比 (HR):0.78;95% 置信区间 (CI):0.71 至 0.84)、中风(HR:0.60;95% CI:0.48 至 0.76)、心衰再住院(HR:0.92;95% CI:0.相对风险:1.93;95% CI:1.50 至 2.49),而手术消融与随访期间植入永久起搏器的更高风险相关(HR:1.35;95% CI:1.03 至 1.77)。两组患者在随访期间大出血的情况没有明显差异。与未经治疗的房颤患者相比,接受心脏手术的房颤患者接受手术消融治疗可降低长期死亡率、中风和心衰再住院的风险。鉴于生存获益主要是在观察性研究中观察到的,因此有必要进一步开展随机试验来证实这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信