Pregnancy Outcomes in Grand Multiparity Women With Antiphospholipid Antibodies

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY
Keren Zloto, Shani Steinberg, Shir Lev, Rakefet Yoeli-Ullman, Stanley Niznik, Nancy Agmon-Levin, Keren Ofir
{"title":"Pregnancy Outcomes in Grand Multiparity Women With Antiphospholipid Antibodies","authors":"Keren Zloto,&nbsp;Shani Steinberg,&nbsp;Shir Lev,&nbsp;Rakefet Yoeli-Ullman,&nbsp;Stanley Niznik,&nbsp;Nancy Agmon-Levin,&nbsp;Keren Ofir","doi":"10.1111/aji.70013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>In recent years antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) as well as antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) prevalence has demonstrated an upward trend in women during reproductive age. There is a lack of data concerning its effects on women with grand multiparity (GMP) (parity ≥5). Hence, this study aimed to assess pregnancy outcomes among GMP aPL/APS patients.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Study Design</h3>\n \n <p>We retrospectively assembled the births of GMP women with aPL/APS, between 2017 and 2022 in the Sheba Medical Center. We compared their deliveries with those of two control groups: (1) the “aPL/APS-controls”—of pregnant women with aPL/APS and parity &lt;5. (2) The “GMP-controls”- parity ≥5 without aPL/APS. We examined demographics, aPL characteristics, pregnancy, and neonatal outcomes between the groups.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>In total, 42 deliveries in the study group were compared to 461 deliveries in the “aPL/APS-controls” group and 84 deliveries of the “GMP-controls.” Most parameters were similar across groups. However, the study group had a higher rate of obstetric APS diagnosis (64.64% vs. 83.33%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01) and showed significant differences such as older maternal age, higher BMI, more polyhydramnios cases, and larger babies compared to controls (33.91 vs. 36.19, <i>p</i> = 0.05; 23.2 vs. 28.89, <i>p</i> = 0.02; 3.68 vs. 11.9, <i>p</i> = 0.01; and 2.17 vs. 14.28, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01, respectively).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Our findings reveal that perinatal outcomes in aPL/APS GMP women are comparable and not inferior to those in aPL/APS women with &lt;5 pregnancies or in comparison to the general GMP population. The minor differences observed may all be related to GMP women's older age and higher BMI.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":7665,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Reproductive Immunology","volume":"92 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/aji.70013","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Reproductive Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aji.70013","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

In recent years antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) as well as antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) prevalence has demonstrated an upward trend in women during reproductive age. There is a lack of data concerning its effects on women with grand multiparity (GMP) (parity ≥5). Hence, this study aimed to assess pregnancy outcomes among GMP aPL/APS patients.

Study Design

We retrospectively assembled the births of GMP women with aPL/APS, between 2017 and 2022 in the Sheba Medical Center. We compared their deliveries with those of two control groups: (1) the “aPL/APS-controls”—of pregnant women with aPL/APS and parity <5. (2) The “GMP-controls”- parity ≥5 without aPL/APS. We examined demographics, aPL characteristics, pregnancy, and neonatal outcomes between the groups.

Results

In total, 42 deliveries in the study group were compared to 461 deliveries in the “aPL/APS-controls” group and 84 deliveries of the “GMP-controls.” Most parameters were similar across groups. However, the study group had a higher rate of obstetric APS diagnosis (64.64% vs. 83.33%, p < 0.01) and showed significant differences such as older maternal age, higher BMI, more polyhydramnios cases, and larger babies compared to controls (33.91 vs. 36.19, p = 0.05; 23.2 vs. 28.89, p = 0.02; 3.68 vs. 11.9, p = 0.01; and 2.17 vs. 14.28, p < 0.01, respectively).

Conclusions

Our findings reveal that perinatal outcomes in aPL/APS GMP women are comparable and not inferior to those in aPL/APS women with <5 pregnancies or in comparison to the general GMP population. The minor differences observed may all be related to GMP women's older age and higher BMI.

患有抗磷脂抗体的大龄多产妇的妊娠结局。
目的:近年来,抗磷脂综合征(APS)和抗磷脂抗体(aPL)在育龄妇女中的发病率呈上升趋势。目前还缺乏有关抗磷脂综合征对多胎妊娠(GMP)(胎次≥5)妇女影响的数据。因此,本研究旨在评估GMP aPL/APS患者的妊娠结局:我们回顾性地收集了 2017 年至 2022 年期间在谢巴医疗中心分娩的 GMP aPL/APS 妇女的分娩情况。我们将她们的分娩情况与两个对照组的分娩情况进行了比较:(1)"aPL/APS-对照组"--aPL/APS孕妇和奇数结果:研究组的 42 例分娩与 "aPL/APS-对照组 "的 461 例分娩和 "GMP-对照组 "的 84 例分娩进行了比较。各组的大多数参数相似。然而,研究组的产科 APS 诊断率更高(64.64% 对 83.33%,P 结论:研究组的产科 APS 诊断率更高:我们的研究结果表明,患有 aPL/APS 的 GMP 孕妇的围产期结果与患有 aPL/APS 的 GMP 孕妇相当,并不逊色于患有 aPL/APS 的 GMP 孕妇。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.60%
发文量
314
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Reproductive Immunology is an international journal devoted to the presentation of current information in all areas relating to Reproductive Immunology. The journal is directed toward both the basic scientist and the clinician, covering the whole process of reproduction as affected by immunological processes. The journal covers a variety of subspecialty topics, including fertility immunology, pregnancy immunology, immunogenetics, mucosal immunology, immunocontraception, endometriosis, abortion, tumor immunology of the reproductive tract, autoantibodies, infectious disease of the reproductive tract, and technical news.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信