Methodological challenges and actionable recommendations in studying the health effects of high-concentration THC products.

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Tianjing Li, George Sam Wang, Ashley Brooks-Russell, Gregory Tung, Louis Leslie, Thanitsara Rittiphairoj, Jean-Pierre Oberste, Tsz Wing Yim, Lisa Bero, Jonathan M Samet
{"title":"Methodological challenges and actionable recommendations in studying the health effects of high-concentration THC products.","authors":"Tianjing Li, George Sam Wang, Ashley Brooks-Russell, Gregory Tung, Louis Leslie, Thanitsara Rittiphairoj, Jean-Pierre Oberste, Tsz Wing Yim, Lisa Bero, Jonathan M Samet","doi":"10.1093/aje/kwae421","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In conducting a scoping review on the health effects of high-concentration cannabis products, we have uncovered pervasive methodological shortcomings within the cannabis literature. This paper begins by defining the 'causal effect' of interest for public health and delineating the desirable features of study design that can address crucial questions pertaining to public health and policy. We further delve into the methodological complexities inherent in studying the health effects of high-concentration cannabis products, describing challenges associated with the measurement of exposures and outcomes, confounding, selection bias, and the generalizability of findings. We introduce causal inference methods to mitigate potential biases in observational cannabis use studies. We identify specific areas that necessitate further development and investigation to deepen our understanding of this topic. Finally, this paper extends actionable recommendations, serving as a roadmap for upcoming research initiatives in this domain.</p>","PeriodicalId":7472,"journal":{"name":"American journal of epidemiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwae421","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In conducting a scoping review on the health effects of high-concentration cannabis products, we have uncovered pervasive methodological shortcomings within the cannabis literature. This paper begins by defining the 'causal effect' of interest for public health and delineating the desirable features of study design that can address crucial questions pertaining to public health and policy. We further delve into the methodological complexities inherent in studying the health effects of high-concentration cannabis products, describing challenges associated with the measurement of exposures and outcomes, confounding, selection bias, and the generalizability of findings. We introduce causal inference methods to mitigate potential biases in observational cannabis use studies. We identify specific areas that necessitate further development and investigation to deepen our understanding of this topic. Finally, this paper extends actionable recommendations, serving as a roadmap for upcoming research initiatives in this domain.

研究高浓度四氢大麻酚产品对健康影响的方法挑战和可行建议。
在对高浓度大麻产品对健康的影响进行范围审查时,我们发现大麻文献中普遍存在方法上的缺陷。本文首先定义了与公共健康相关的 "因果效应",并阐述了能够解决与公共健康和政策相关的关键问题的研究设计的理想特征。我们进一步深入探讨了研究高浓度大麻产品对健康的影响所固有的复杂方法,描述了与暴露和结果测量、混杂、选择偏差以及研究结果的普遍性相关的挑战。我们介绍了因果推论方法,以减轻观察性大麻使用研究中的潜在偏差。我们确定了需要进一步发展和调查的具体领域,以加深我们对这一主题的理解。最后,本文提出了可操作的建议,为该领域即将开展的研究活动提供了路线图。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American journal of epidemiology
American journal of epidemiology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
221
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Epidemiology is the oldest and one of the premier epidemiologic journals devoted to the publication of empirical research findings, opinion pieces, and methodological developments in the field of epidemiologic research. It is a peer-reviewed journal aimed at both fellow epidemiologists and those who use epidemiologic data, including public health workers and clinicians.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信