Greater environmental risk of shale gas produced water from lacustrine than marine sources in Fuling shale gas field, China: Insights from inorganic compounds, dissolved organic matter, and halogenated organic compounds
Hualiang Feng , Yani Lai , Xiaojun Wang , Zhaoji Zhang , Shaohua Chen
{"title":"Greater environmental risk of shale gas produced water from lacustrine than marine sources in Fuling shale gas field, China: Insights from inorganic compounds, dissolved organic matter, and halogenated organic compounds","authors":"Hualiang Feng , Yani Lai , Xiaojun Wang , Zhaoji Zhang , Shaohua Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.watres.2024.122719","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Lacustrine shale gas represents a promising frontier in the future development of shale gas resources. However, research on the characterization of lacustrine shale gas produced water (SGPW) remains scarce. In this study, we characterized the geochemical properties of both marine and lacustrine SGPW (MSGPW and LSGPW) and assessed their dissolved organic matter (DOM) components using fluorescence EEM spectroscopy. Additionally, we employed Fourier-transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry (FT-ICR MS) to analyze halogenated organic compounds (HOCs) and non-HOCs in SGPW, as well as their transformations during storage in open impoundments. Pollutants in LSGPW generally had higher concentrations and greater fluctuations compared to those in MSGPW. Our findings from EEM spectroscopy and FT-ICR MS revealed that phenolic compounds may be important components of DOM in all SGPW. Moreover, the number of detected unique molecules in LSGPW was greater than in MSGPW. CHO or CHOS compounds dominated in non-HOCs, with LSGPW exhibiting generally higher DBE, modified aromaticity index (AI<sub>mod</sub>), nominal oxidation state of carbon (NOSC), double bond equivalent minus oxygen per carbon ((DBE-O)/C) values, and lower H/C values compared to MSGPW, while unsaturated aliphatic compounds typically dominated in HOCs. Furthermore, we employed 37 transformation reactions that might occur during SGPW storage and found that oxygen addition and dealkyl group reactions were predominant, with these two types of reactions occurring more frequently in LSGPW than in MSGPW. LSGPW exhibited higher toxicity compared to MSGPW, with toxicity positively correlated with the concentrations of inorganic salts and organic substances with higher AI<sub>mod</sub>, NOSC, and (DBE-O)/C. These findings contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of LSGPW, enabling the design and implementation of more rational disposal measures to effectively mitigate its potential environmental risks.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":443,"journal":{"name":"Water Research","volume":"268 ","pages":"Article 122719"},"PeriodicalIF":11.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S004313542401618X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Lacustrine shale gas represents a promising frontier in the future development of shale gas resources. However, research on the characterization of lacustrine shale gas produced water (SGPW) remains scarce. In this study, we characterized the geochemical properties of both marine and lacustrine SGPW (MSGPW and LSGPW) and assessed their dissolved organic matter (DOM) components using fluorescence EEM spectroscopy. Additionally, we employed Fourier-transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry (FT-ICR MS) to analyze halogenated organic compounds (HOCs) and non-HOCs in SGPW, as well as their transformations during storage in open impoundments. Pollutants in LSGPW generally had higher concentrations and greater fluctuations compared to those in MSGPW. Our findings from EEM spectroscopy and FT-ICR MS revealed that phenolic compounds may be important components of DOM in all SGPW. Moreover, the number of detected unique molecules in LSGPW was greater than in MSGPW. CHO or CHOS compounds dominated in non-HOCs, with LSGPW exhibiting generally higher DBE, modified aromaticity index (AImod), nominal oxidation state of carbon (NOSC), double bond equivalent minus oxygen per carbon ((DBE-O)/C) values, and lower H/C values compared to MSGPW, while unsaturated aliphatic compounds typically dominated in HOCs. Furthermore, we employed 37 transformation reactions that might occur during SGPW storage and found that oxygen addition and dealkyl group reactions were predominant, with these two types of reactions occurring more frequently in LSGPW than in MSGPW. LSGPW exhibited higher toxicity compared to MSGPW, with toxicity positively correlated with the concentrations of inorganic salts and organic substances with higher AImod, NOSC, and (DBE-O)/C. These findings contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of LSGPW, enabling the design and implementation of more rational disposal measures to effectively mitigate its potential environmental risks.
期刊介绍:
Water Research, along with its open access companion journal Water Research X, serves as a platform for publishing original research papers covering various aspects of the science and technology related to the anthropogenic water cycle, water quality, and its management worldwide. The audience targeted by the journal comprises biologists, chemical engineers, chemists, civil engineers, environmental engineers, limnologists, and microbiologists. The scope of the journal include:
•Treatment processes for water and wastewaters (municipal, agricultural, industrial, and on-site treatment), including resource recovery and residuals management;
•Urban hydrology including sewer systems, stormwater management, and green infrastructure;
•Drinking water treatment and distribution;
•Potable and non-potable water reuse;
•Sanitation, public health, and risk assessment;
•Anaerobic digestion, solid and hazardous waste management, including source characterization and the effects and control of leachates and gaseous emissions;
•Contaminants (chemical, microbial, anthropogenic particles such as nanoparticles or microplastics) and related water quality sensing, monitoring, fate, and assessment;
•Anthropogenic impacts on inland, tidal, coastal and urban waters, focusing on surface and ground waters, and point and non-point sources of pollution;
•Environmental restoration, linked to surface water, groundwater and groundwater remediation;
•Analysis of the interfaces between sediments and water, and between water and atmosphere, focusing specifically on anthropogenic impacts;
•Mathematical modelling, systems analysis, machine learning, and beneficial use of big data related to the anthropogenic water cycle;
•Socio-economic, policy, and regulations studies.