Fida Mohammad Sahil, Mukund Narayanan, Idhayachandhiran Ilampooranan
{"title":"Setting Up Methane Mitigation Measures for Indian Rice Fields: Representative Emissions and New Interpretations","authors":"Fida Mohammad Sahil, Mukund Narayanan, Idhayachandhiran Ilampooranan","doi":"10.1029/2024GB008107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Rice cultivation produces methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) due to anaerobic conditions induced by flood irrigation, significantly contributing to global warming. While most studies use national emission factors (EFs), our study synthesized 726 published measurements across India (the second largest methane emitter after China) to develop district-level water regime-specific EFs for estimating district-scale emissions and warming potential. CH<sub>4</sub> emissions from Indian rice fields increased from 3.7 (3.4–4.1) Tg to 4.8 (4.4–5.3) Tg during 1966–2017, driven by rice area and water-regime variations. Meanwhile, district-level emissions increased by ∼930%, influenced by management practices such as animal manure, fertilizer application, and water input, accurately reflecting regional variations compared to previous estimates. Employing a novel muti-output random forest mitigation model (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> ∼ 0.9), we found that a 25% warming reduction at the district-level requires curtailing animal manure, nitrogen fertilizer, and water input by 8.5%, 12.9%, and 10.9%, respectively. These curtailments nearly double for a 50% mitigation scenario. Comparing our emissions with previous bottom-up studies (used as inputs in global climate models) revealed discrepancies in prior national figures. With top-down estimates, our emissions correlated positively, suggesting higher reliability. Including our new regionally validated data in global climate models may provide more accurate climate projections at the Indian and global scales.</p>","PeriodicalId":12729,"journal":{"name":"Global Biogeochemical Cycles","volume":"38 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Biogeochemical Cycles","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024GB008107","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Rice cultivation produces methane (CH4) due to anaerobic conditions induced by flood irrigation, significantly contributing to global warming. While most studies use national emission factors (EFs), our study synthesized 726 published measurements across India (the second largest methane emitter after China) to develop district-level water regime-specific EFs for estimating district-scale emissions and warming potential. CH4 emissions from Indian rice fields increased from 3.7 (3.4–4.1) Tg to 4.8 (4.4–5.3) Tg during 1966–2017, driven by rice area and water-regime variations. Meanwhile, district-level emissions increased by ∼930%, influenced by management practices such as animal manure, fertilizer application, and water input, accurately reflecting regional variations compared to previous estimates. Employing a novel muti-output random forest mitigation model (R2 ∼ 0.9), we found that a 25% warming reduction at the district-level requires curtailing animal manure, nitrogen fertilizer, and water input by 8.5%, 12.9%, and 10.9%, respectively. These curtailments nearly double for a 50% mitigation scenario. Comparing our emissions with previous bottom-up studies (used as inputs in global climate models) revealed discrepancies in prior national figures. With top-down estimates, our emissions correlated positively, suggesting higher reliability. Including our new regionally validated data in global climate models may provide more accurate climate projections at the Indian and global scales.
期刊介绍:
Global Biogeochemical Cycles (GBC) features research on regional to global biogeochemical interactions, as well as more local studies that demonstrate fundamental implications for biogeochemical processing at regional or global scales. Published papers draw on a wide array of methods and knowledge and extend in time from the deep geologic past to recent historical and potential future interactions. This broad scope includes studies that elucidate human activities as interactive components of biogeochemical cycles and physical Earth Systems including climate. Authors are required to make their work accessible to a broad interdisciplinary range of scientists.