Selling format selection in the presence of rebate provision

IF 8.3 1区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS
Yuan Jiang , Ruixiao Dong , Hao Wu , Xu Guan
{"title":"Selling format selection in the presence of rebate provision","authors":"Yuan Jiang ,&nbsp;Ruixiao Dong ,&nbsp;Hao Wu ,&nbsp;Xu Guan","doi":"10.1016/j.tre.2024.103791","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper investigates the sellers’ optimal rebate provision strategies in a supply chain setting wherein two competing sellers offer substitutable products via a common platform, and can choose whether to provide rebates to boost their respective sales. We consider two selling formats: wholesale format and agency format (with exogenous commission rate) to capture the interaction between the sellers and platform. We show that the sellers always choose to provide rebates under wholesale format, while only doing so under agency format when the commission rate is low. With either selling format, the sellers target both rebate-sensitive and rebate-insensitive consumers when the ratio of sensitive consumers is low enough, otherwise targeting only rebate-sensitive consumers as a means to explore the benefits derived from the offer of a rebate. With certain conditions, intensified competition will hurt the platform under wholesale format while benefit it under agency format, a result differs from when there are no rebates provided. The preferences of the sellers and the platform over two selling formats are jointly determined by the commission rate and the composition of consumers. When the ratio of rebate-sensitive consumers increases, sellers’ preference for the agency format first decreases and then increases. When this ratio is sufficiently high, charging a high commission rate will reduce the platform’s profit under agency format, making the wholesale format more preferable. We also consider an alternative scenario wherein the commission rate is endogenous and show that the results remain qualitatively intact.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49418,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part E-Logistics and Transportation Review","volume":"192 ","pages":"Article 103791"},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part E-Logistics and Transportation Review","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S136655452400382X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper investigates the sellers’ optimal rebate provision strategies in a supply chain setting wherein two competing sellers offer substitutable products via a common platform, and can choose whether to provide rebates to boost their respective sales. We consider two selling formats: wholesale format and agency format (with exogenous commission rate) to capture the interaction between the sellers and platform. We show that the sellers always choose to provide rebates under wholesale format, while only doing so under agency format when the commission rate is low. With either selling format, the sellers target both rebate-sensitive and rebate-insensitive consumers when the ratio of sensitive consumers is low enough, otherwise targeting only rebate-sensitive consumers as a means to explore the benefits derived from the offer of a rebate. With certain conditions, intensified competition will hurt the platform under wholesale format while benefit it under agency format, a result differs from when there are no rebates provided. The preferences of the sellers and the platform over two selling formats are jointly determined by the commission rate and the composition of consumers. When the ratio of rebate-sensitive consumers increases, sellers’ preference for the agency format first decreases and then increases. When this ratio is sufficiently high, charging a high commission rate will reduce the platform’s profit under agency format, making the wholesale format more preferable. We also consider an alternative scenario wherein the commission rate is endogenous and show that the results remain qualitatively intact.
在有回扣规定的情况下选择销售形式
在供应链环境中,两个相互竞争的卖家通过一个共同的平台提供可替代的产品,并可以选择是否提供回扣以提高各自的销售额,本文研究了卖家的最优回扣提供策略。我们考虑了两种销售形式:批发形式和代理形式(外生佣金率),以捕捉卖家和平台之间的互动。我们的研究表明,在批发形式下,卖家总是选择提供返利,而在代理形式下,只有当佣金率较低时,卖家才会选择提供返利。无论是哪种销售形式,当对返利敏感的消费者比例足够低时,卖家都会同时瞄准对返利敏感和对返利不敏感的消费者,否则就只瞄准对返利敏感的消费者,以此来挖掘提供返利所带来的利益。在一定条件下,竞争加剧会损害批发形式下的平台,而有利于代理形式下的平台,这一结果与不提供返利时不同。卖家和平台对两种销售形式的偏好是由佣金率和消费者构成共同决定的。当对返利敏感的消费者比例增加时,卖家对代理形式的偏好先降后升。当这一比例足够高时,收取高额佣金会减少平台在代理形式下的利润,从而使批发形式更受欢迎。我们还考虑了另一种情况,即佣金率是内生的,结果表明其性质保持不变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.20
自引率
16.00%
发文量
285
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review is a reputable journal that publishes high-quality articles covering a wide range of topics in the field of logistics and transportation research. The journal welcomes submissions on various subjects, including transport economics, transport infrastructure and investment appraisal, evaluation of public policies related to transportation, empirical and analytical studies of logistics management practices and performance, logistics and operations models, and logistics and supply chain management. Part E aims to provide informative and well-researched articles that contribute to the understanding and advancement of the field. The content of the journal is complementary to other prestigious journals in transportation research, such as Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Part B: Methodological, Part C: Emerging Technologies, Part D: Transport and Environment, and Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. Together, these journals form a comprehensive and cohesive reference for current research in transportation science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信