{"title":"Selling format selection in the presence of rebate provision","authors":"Yuan Jiang , Ruixiao Dong , Hao Wu , Xu Guan","doi":"10.1016/j.tre.2024.103791","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper investigates the sellers’ optimal rebate provision strategies in a supply chain setting wherein two competing sellers offer substitutable products via a common platform, and can choose whether to provide rebates to boost their respective sales. We consider two selling formats: wholesale format and agency format (with exogenous commission rate) to capture the interaction between the sellers and platform. We show that the sellers always choose to provide rebates under wholesale format, while only doing so under agency format when the commission rate is low. With either selling format, the sellers target both rebate-sensitive and rebate-insensitive consumers when the ratio of sensitive consumers is low enough, otherwise targeting only rebate-sensitive consumers as a means to explore the benefits derived from the offer of a rebate. With certain conditions, intensified competition will hurt the platform under wholesale format while benefit it under agency format, a result differs from when there are no rebates provided. The preferences of the sellers and the platform over two selling formats are jointly determined by the commission rate and the composition of consumers. When the ratio of rebate-sensitive consumers increases, sellers’ preference for the agency format first decreases and then increases. When this ratio is sufficiently high, charging a high commission rate will reduce the platform’s profit under agency format, making the wholesale format more preferable. We also consider an alternative scenario wherein the commission rate is endogenous and show that the results remain qualitatively intact.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49418,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part E-Logistics and Transportation Review","volume":"192 ","pages":"Article 103791"},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part E-Logistics and Transportation Review","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S136655452400382X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This paper investigates the sellers’ optimal rebate provision strategies in a supply chain setting wherein two competing sellers offer substitutable products via a common platform, and can choose whether to provide rebates to boost their respective sales. We consider two selling formats: wholesale format and agency format (with exogenous commission rate) to capture the interaction between the sellers and platform. We show that the sellers always choose to provide rebates under wholesale format, while only doing so under agency format when the commission rate is low. With either selling format, the sellers target both rebate-sensitive and rebate-insensitive consumers when the ratio of sensitive consumers is low enough, otherwise targeting only rebate-sensitive consumers as a means to explore the benefits derived from the offer of a rebate. With certain conditions, intensified competition will hurt the platform under wholesale format while benefit it under agency format, a result differs from when there are no rebates provided. The preferences of the sellers and the platform over two selling formats are jointly determined by the commission rate and the composition of consumers. When the ratio of rebate-sensitive consumers increases, sellers’ preference for the agency format first decreases and then increases. When this ratio is sufficiently high, charging a high commission rate will reduce the platform’s profit under agency format, making the wholesale format more preferable. We also consider an alternative scenario wherein the commission rate is endogenous and show that the results remain qualitatively intact.
期刊介绍:
Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review is a reputable journal that publishes high-quality articles covering a wide range of topics in the field of logistics and transportation research. The journal welcomes submissions on various subjects, including transport economics, transport infrastructure and investment appraisal, evaluation of public policies related to transportation, empirical and analytical studies of logistics management practices and performance, logistics and operations models, and logistics and supply chain management.
Part E aims to provide informative and well-researched articles that contribute to the understanding and advancement of the field. The content of the journal is complementary to other prestigious journals in transportation research, such as Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Part B: Methodological, Part C: Emerging Technologies, Part D: Transport and Environment, and Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. Together, these journals form a comprehensive and cohesive reference for current research in transportation science.