{"title":"Causal similarity learning with multi-level predictive relation aggregation for grouped root cause diagnosis of industrial faults","authors":"Liujiayi Zhao, Pengyu Song, Chunhui Zhao","doi":"10.1016/j.conengprac.2024.106140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Existing root cause diagnosis (RCD) methods infer causal relationships among abnormal variables by decomposing causal graphs into intra-group and inter-group levels, reducing redundancy according to direct causality. However, the indirect causality trigged by wide-range fault propagation may be ignored when inferring within groups, leading to the mismatch between causality distribution and grouping results. To overcome the challenge, we propose a causal similarity learning method with multi-level predictive relation aggregation, which contains a complementary similarity measurement framework covering both single-level and high-level causal relationships. First, an attention mechanism with temporal misalignment is designed, which can convert the undirected correlations of features into directed high-level causal similarity by extracting lagged predictive relations. Further, a graph-cutting penalty term is proposed to promote causality distribution to exhibit intra-group denseness and inter-group sparsity, so that single-level causal similarity can be considered during grouping. Finally, a dual RCD method is proposed to search root causes from the causal graph with intra-group and inter-group causality. In this way, numerous redundant causations caused by complex fault propagation can be succinctly described by inter-group causation, and the search for root cause variables can be limited to subgroups to improve diagnosis efficiency. The validity of the proposed method is illustrated through both the Tennessee Eastman benchmark example and a real industrial process.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50615,"journal":{"name":"Control Engineering Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Control Engineering Practice","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967066124002995","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Existing root cause diagnosis (RCD) methods infer causal relationships among abnormal variables by decomposing causal graphs into intra-group and inter-group levels, reducing redundancy according to direct causality. However, the indirect causality trigged by wide-range fault propagation may be ignored when inferring within groups, leading to the mismatch between causality distribution and grouping results. To overcome the challenge, we propose a causal similarity learning method with multi-level predictive relation aggregation, which contains a complementary similarity measurement framework covering both single-level and high-level causal relationships. First, an attention mechanism with temporal misalignment is designed, which can convert the undirected correlations of features into directed high-level causal similarity by extracting lagged predictive relations. Further, a graph-cutting penalty term is proposed to promote causality distribution to exhibit intra-group denseness and inter-group sparsity, so that single-level causal similarity can be considered during grouping. Finally, a dual RCD method is proposed to search root causes from the causal graph with intra-group and inter-group causality. In this way, numerous redundant causations caused by complex fault propagation can be succinctly described by inter-group causation, and the search for root cause variables can be limited to subgroups to improve diagnosis efficiency. The validity of the proposed method is illustrated through both the Tennessee Eastman benchmark example and a real industrial process.
期刊介绍:
Control Engineering Practice strives to meet the needs of industrial practitioners and industrially related academics and researchers. It publishes papers which illustrate the direct application of control theory and its supporting tools in all possible areas of automation. As a result, the journal only contains papers which can be considered to have made significant contributions to the application of advanced control techniques. It is normally expected that practical results should be included, but where simulation only studies are available, it is necessary to demonstrate that the simulation model is representative of a genuine application. Strictly theoretical papers will find a more appropriate home in Control Engineering Practice''s sister publication, Automatica. It is also expected that papers are innovative with respect to the state of the art and are sufficiently detailed for a reader to be able to duplicate the main results of the paper (supplementary material, including datasets, tables, code and any relevant interactive material can be made available and downloaded from the website). The benefits of the presented methods must be made very clear and the new techniques must be compared and contrasted with results obtained using existing methods. Moreover, a thorough analysis of failures that may happen in the design process and implementation can also be part of the paper.
The scope of Control Engineering Practice matches the activities of IFAC.
Papers demonstrating the contribution of automation and control in improving the performance, quality, productivity, sustainability, resource and energy efficiency, and the manageability of systems and processes for the benefit of mankind and are relevant to industrial practitioners are most welcome.