Causal similarity learning with multi-level predictive relation aggregation for grouped root cause diagnosis of industrial faults

IF 5.4 2区 计算机科学 Q1 AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS
Liujiayi Zhao, Pengyu Song, Chunhui Zhao
{"title":"Causal similarity learning with multi-level predictive relation aggregation for grouped root cause diagnosis of industrial faults","authors":"Liujiayi Zhao,&nbsp;Pengyu Song,&nbsp;Chunhui Zhao","doi":"10.1016/j.conengprac.2024.106140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Existing root cause diagnosis (RCD) methods infer causal relationships among abnormal variables by decomposing causal graphs into intra-group and inter-group levels, reducing redundancy according to direct causality. However, the indirect causality trigged by wide-range fault propagation may be ignored when inferring within groups, leading to the mismatch between causality distribution and grouping results. To overcome the challenge, we propose a causal similarity learning method with multi-level predictive relation aggregation, which contains a complementary similarity measurement framework covering both single-level and high-level causal relationships. First, an attention mechanism with temporal misalignment is designed, which can convert the undirected correlations of features into directed high-level causal similarity by extracting lagged predictive relations. Further, a graph-cutting penalty term is proposed to promote causality distribution to exhibit intra-group denseness and inter-group sparsity, so that single-level causal similarity can be considered during grouping. Finally, a dual RCD method is proposed to search root causes from the causal graph with intra-group and inter-group causality. In this way, numerous redundant causations caused by complex fault propagation can be succinctly described by inter-group causation, and the search for root cause variables can be limited to subgroups to improve diagnosis efficiency. The validity of the proposed method is illustrated through both the Tennessee Eastman benchmark example and a real industrial process.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50615,"journal":{"name":"Control Engineering Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Control Engineering Practice","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967066124002995","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Existing root cause diagnosis (RCD) methods infer causal relationships among abnormal variables by decomposing causal graphs into intra-group and inter-group levels, reducing redundancy according to direct causality. However, the indirect causality trigged by wide-range fault propagation may be ignored when inferring within groups, leading to the mismatch between causality distribution and grouping results. To overcome the challenge, we propose a causal similarity learning method with multi-level predictive relation aggregation, which contains a complementary similarity measurement framework covering both single-level and high-level causal relationships. First, an attention mechanism with temporal misalignment is designed, which can convert the undirected correlations of features into directed high-level causal similarity by extracting lagged predictive relations. Further, a graph-cutting penalty term is proposed to promote causality distribution to exhibit intra-group denseness and inter-group sparsity, so that single-level causal similarity can be considered during grouping. Finally, a dual RCD method is proposed to search root causes from the causal graph with intra-group and inter-group causality. In this way, numerous redundant causations caused by complex fault propagation can be succinctly described by inter-group causation, and the search for root cause variables can be limited to subgroups to improve diagnosis efficiency. The validity of the proposed method is illustrated through both the Tennessee Eastman benchmark example and a real industrial process.
采用多级预测关系聚合的因果相似性学习,用于工业故障的分组根源诊断
现有的根源诊断(RCD)方法通过将因果图分解为组内和组间两个层次来推断异常变量之间的因果关系,从而根据直接因果关系减少冗余。然而,在组内推断时,可能会忽略大范围故障传播引发的间接因果关系,导致因果关系分布与分组结果不匹配。为了克服这一难题,我们提出了一种多层次预测关系聚合的因果相似性学习方法,该方法包含一个互补的相似性测量框架,涵盖单层次和高层次的因果关系。首先,我们设计了一种具有时间错位的关注机制,通过提取滞后的预测关系,将特征的无向相关性转化为有向的高层次因果相似性。此外,还提出了一个图切割惩罚项,以促进因果关系分布呈现出组内密集、组间稀疏的特点,从而在分组时可以考虑单层次的因果相似性。最后,提出了一种双重 RCD 方法,从具有组内和组间因果关系的因果图中搜索根本原因。这样,复杂故障传播引起的大量冗余因果关系就可以通过组间因果关系得到简洁描述,而根源变量的搜索也可以局限于子组,从而提高诊断效率。通过田纳西伊士曼基准实例和实际工业流程,说明了所提方法的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Control Engineering Practice
Control Engineering Practice 工程技术-工程:电子与电气
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
12.20%
发文量
183
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: Control Engineering Practice strives to meet the needs of industrial practitioners and industrially related academics and researchers. It publishes papers which illustrate the direct application of control theory and its supporting tools in all possible areas of automation. As a result, the journal only contains papers which can be considered to have made significant contributions to the application of advanced control techniques. It is normally expected that practical results should be included, but where simulation only studies are available, it is necessary to demonstrate that the simulation model is representative of a genuine application. Strictly theoretical papers will find a more appropriate home in Control Engineering Practice''s sister publication, Automatica. It is also expected that papers are innovative with respect to the state of the art and are sufficiently detailed for a reader to be able to duplicate the main results of the paper (supplementary material, including datasets, tables, code and any relevant interactive material can be made available and downloaded from the website). The benefits of the presented methods must be made very clear and the new techniques must be compared and contrasted with results obtained using existing methods. Moreover, a thorough analysis of failures that may happen in the design process and implementation can also be part of the paper. The scope of Control Engineering Practice matches the activities of IFAC. Papers demonstrating the contribution of automation and control in improving the performance, quality, productivity, sustainability, resource and energy efficiency, and the manageability of systems and processes for the benefit of mankind and are relevant to industrial practitioners are most welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信