Systematic analysis of chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and combination therapy in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (HNSCC) clinical trials: Focusing on overall survival and progression-free survival outcomes

Priya Ganesan, Saravanan Sekaran, Pasiyappazham Ramasamy, Dhanraj Ganapathy
{"title":"Systematic analysis of chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and combination therapy in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (HNSCC) clinical trials: Focusing on overall survival and progression-free survival outcomes","authors":"Priya Ganesan,&nbsp;Saravanan Sekaran,&nbsp;Pasiyappazham Ramasamy,&nbsp;Dhanraj Ganapathy","doi":"10.1016/j.oor.2024.100673","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is a challenging malignancy characterized by poor prognosis, particularly in advanced or metastatic stages. Standard chemotherapy, primarily platinum-based, has long been the cornerstone of treatment for recurrent or metastatic HNSCC, yet its survival benefits remain modest, with significant toxicity. The advent of immunotherapy, specifically immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway, has shifted the treatment paradigm by offering durable responses in a subset of patients, particularly those with biomarker-driven indications. Meanwhile, combination therapy, integrating chemotherapy with immunotherapy or targeted agents, has emerged as a potential strategy to enhance therapeutic efficacy. This review provides a comparative analysis of chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and combination therapy (CICT) based on clinical trial outcomes, focusing on two key metrics: overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). While chemotherapy alone typically results in limited survival benefits, immunotherapy has demonstrated significant OS improvements, especially in biomarker-selected populations, though its impact on PFS is less consistent. Combination therapies have shown promise in improving both OS and PFS compared to monotherapies, though they also raise concerns about cumulative toxicity. By evaluating the strengths and limitations of each treatment approach, this review aims to clarify their relative roles in the current and future treatment landscape for HNSCC. It also underscores the importance of ongoing research to refine therapeutic strategies and optimize patient outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94378,"journal":{"name":"Oral Oncology Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral Oncology Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772906024005193","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is a challenging malignancy characterized by poor prognosis, particularly in advanced or metastatic stages. Standard chemotherapy, primarily platinum-based, has long been the cornerstone of treatment for recurrent or metastatic HNSCC, yet its survival benefits remain modest, with significant toxicity. The advent of immunotherapy, specifically immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway, has shifted the treatment paradigm by offering durable responses in a subset of patients, particularly those with biomarker-driven indications. Meanwhile, combination therapy, integrating chemotherapy with immunotherapy or targeted agents, has emerged as a potential strategy to enhance therapeutic efficacy. This review provides a comparative analysis of chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and combination therapy (CICT) based on clinical trial outcomes, focusing on two key metrics: overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). While chemotherapy alone typically results in limited survival benefits, immunotherapy has demonstrated significant OS improvements, especially in biomarker-selected populations, though its impact on PFS is less consistent. Combination therapies have shown promise in improving both OS and PFS compared to monotherapies, though they also raise concerns about cumulative toxicity. By evaluating the strengths and limitations of each treatment approach, this review aims to clarify their relative roles in the current and future treatment landscape for HNSCC. It also underscores the importance of ongoing research to refine therapeutic strategies and optimize patient outcomes.
头颈部鳞状细胞癌 (HNSCC) 临床试验中化疗、免疫疗法和综合疗法的系统分析:关注总生存期和无进展生存期结果
头颈部鳞状细胞癌(HNSCC)是一种具有挑战性的恶性肿瘤,其特点是预后不良,尤其是在晚期或转移期。长期以来,以铂类药物为主的标准化疗一直是治疗复发性或转移性 HNSCC 的基石,但其生存率仍然不高,且毒性显著。免疫疗法的出现,特别是以 PD-1/PD-L1 通路为靶点的免疫检查点抑制剂的出现,改变了治疗模式,为一部分患者,特别是具有生物标志物驱动适应症的患者提供了持久的治疗效果。与此同时,将化疗与免疫疗法或靶向药物相结合的联合疗法已成为提高疗效的潜在策略。本综述基于临床试验结果对化疗、免疫疗法和联合疗法(CICT)进行了比较分析,重点关注两个关键指标:总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)。单纯化疗通常只能带来有限的生存获益,而免疫疗法却能显著改善患者的生存期,尤其是在生物标志物筛选人群中,但其对无进展生存期的影响却不那么一致。与单一疗法相比,联合疗法有望改善OS和PFS,但也引发了对累积毒性的担忧。通过评估每种治疗方法的优势和局限性,本综述旨在阐明它们在当前和未来的 HNSCC 治疗中的相对作用。它还强调了持续研究对完善治疗策略和优化患者预后的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信