Quantitative ultrasound for steatosis assessment using Hepatoscope®: Confounding technical factors

Adrien Besson , Baptiste Hériard-Dubreuil , Joel Gay , Adèle Delamarre , Juliette Foucher , Claude Cohen-Bacrie
{"title":"Quantitative ultrasound for steatosis assessment using Hepatoscope®: Confounding technical factors","authors":"Adrien Besson ,&nbsp;Baptiste Hériard-Dubreuil ,&nbsp;Joel Gay ,&nbsp;Adèle Delamarre ,&nbsp;Juliette Foucher ,&nbsp;Claude Cohen-Bacrie","doi":"10.1016/j.wfumbo.2024.100069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) is a well-suited modality to address large-scale screening and monitoring of liver steatosis as it is low-cost, non-invasive, and point-of-care. However, technical and biological confounders lead to difficulties in establishing universal cutoff values for diagnosis. Hepatoscope® remedies this issue as it integrates a unique QUS measurement technique enabling the simultaneous measurements of the backscattering coefficient, the attenuation coefficient and the speed of sound. Such measurements are performed in a large two-dimensional region of interest (ROI) and in a free breathing regime such that a relatively large portion of the liver is sampled. We studied the influence of the size of the ROI, its depth and the number of measurements on the QUS parameters with Hepatoscope® both in vitro on four calibrated phantoms and clinically on 60 participants referred to a hepatology consultation for chronic liver disease. We demonstrated that using large ROIs consistently improves the system reliability and the clinical applicability. We did not observe any systematic effect related to the depth of the ROI. We also showed that averaging consecutive measurements leads to better system reliability and better clinical applicability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101281,"journal":{"name":"WFUMB Ultrasound Open","volume":"2 2","pages":"Article 100069"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"WFUMB Ultrasound Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949668324000375","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) is a well-suited modality to address large-scale screening and monitoring of liver steatosis as it is low-cost, non-invasive, and point-of-care. However, technical and biological confounders lead to difficulties in establishing universal cutoff values for diagnosis. Hepatoscope® remedies this issue as it integrates a unique QUS measurement technique enabling the simultaneous measurements of the backscattering coefficient, the attenuation coefficient and the speed of sound. Such measurements are performed in a large two-dimensional region of interest (ROI) and in a free breathing regime such that a relatively large portion of the liver is sampled. We studied the influence of the size of the ROI, its depth and the number of measurements on the QUS parameters with Hepatoscope® both in vitro on four calibrated phantoms and clinically on 60 participants referred to a hepatology consultation for chronic liver disease. We demonstrated that using large ROIs consistently improves the system reliability and the clinical applicability. We did not observe any systematic effect related to the depth of the ROI. We also showed that averaging consecutive measurements leads to better system reliability and better clinical applicability.
使用 Hepatoscope® 进行脂肪变性定量超声评估:混杂的技术因素
定量超声(QUS)是一种非常适合大规模筛查和监测肝脏脂肪变性的方法,因为它成本低、无创伤、可在医疗点进行。然而,技术和生物学因素导致难以确定通用的诊断临界值。Hepatoscope® 集成了独特的 QUS 测量技术,可同时测量反向散射系数、衰减系数和声速,从而解决了这一问题。这种测量是在一个大的二维感兴趣区(ROI)和自由呼吸状态下进行的,因此可以对相对较大的肝脏部分进行采样。我们研究了 ROI 的大小、深度和测量次数对 Hepatoscope® QUS 参数的影响,包括对四个校准模型的体外测量和对 60 名慢性肝病患者的临床测量。我们证明,使用大的 ROI 可以持续提高系统可靠性和临床适用性。我们没有观察到与 ROI 深度有关的任何系统性影响。我们还发现,对连续测量结果取平均值可提高系统可靠性和临床适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信