Precise LULC classification of rural area combining elevational and reflectance characteristics using UAV

IF 2.7 Q2 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Ke Zhang , Lameck Fiwa , Madoka Kurata , Hiromu Okazawa , Kenford A.B. Luweya , Mohammad Shamim Hasan Mandal , Toru Sakai
{"title":"Precise LULC classification of rural area combining elevational and reflectance characteristics using UAV","authors":"Ke Zhang ,&nbsp;Lameck Fiwa ,&nbsp;Madoka Kurata ,&nbsp;Hiromu Okazawa ,&nbsp;Kenford A.B. Luweya ,&nbsp;Mohammad Shamim Hasan Mandal ,&nbsp;Toru Sakai","doi":"10.1016/j.sciaf.2024.e02431","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>With the development of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) in the recent decade, very high-resolution aerial imagery has been used for precise land use/land cover classification (LULC). However, special structures in rural areas of developing countries such as traditional thatched houses have posed challenges for precise LULC classification due to their undistinctive appearance and confusable characteristics in both reflectance and structure. LULC mapping is essential particularly in rural areas which have high data scarcity and vulnerability to natural disasters. With high-resolution observation has been achieved by UAVs, it is important to propose high-precision LULC classification methods which can fully use the advantages of UAVs. To emphasize the differences among the common LULC types in rural areas, this study proposed an original index, the rural residence classification index (RCI). RCI was calculated as the product of the above ground height and the square of the difference between the NDVI value and one. Then, a comprehensive classification method was established by combining the RCI, the traditional threshold method and a machine learning method. As a result of the comparison with the traditional threshold method, object-based image analysis, and random forest methods, the method by this study achieved the highest overall accuracy (overall accuracy = 0.903, kappa = 0.875) and classification accuracy for detecting thatched houses (user's accuracy = 0.802, producer's accuracy = 0.920). These findings showed the possibility on identifying the confusable structures in rural areas using remote sensing data, which was found difficult by the previous studies so far. The method by this study can promote the further utility of UAVs in LULC classification in rural areas in developing countries, thereby providing precise and reliable material for hydrological, hydraulic or ecosystem modelling, which eventually contributes to more accurate natural hazard risk assessment, rural development, and natural resource management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21690,"journal":{"name":"Scientific African","volume":"26 ","pages":"Article e02431"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific African","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468227624003739","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the development of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) in the recent decade, very high-resolution aerial imagery has been used for precise land use/land cover classification (LULC). However, special structures in rural areas of developing countries such as traditional thatched houses have posed challenges for precise LULC classification due to their undistinctive appearance and confusable characteristics in both reflectance and structure. LULC mapping is essential particularly in rural areas which have high data scarcity and vulnerability to natural disasters. With high-resolution observation has been achieved by UAVs, it is important to propose high-precision LULC classification methods which can fully use the advantages of UAVs. To emphasize the differences among the common LULC types in rural areas, this study proposed an original index, the rural residence classification index (RCI). RCI was calculated as the product of the above ground height and the square of the difference between the NDVI value and one. Then, a comprehensive classification method was established by combining the RCI, the traditional threshold method and a machine learning method. As a result of the comparison with the traditional threshold method, object-based image analysis, and random forest methods, the method by this study achieved the highest overall accuracy (overall accuracy = 0.903, kappa = 0.875) and classification accuracy for detecting thatched houses (user's accuracy = 0.802, producer's accuracy = 0.920). These findings showed the possibility on identifying the confusable structures in rural areas using remote sensing data, which was found difficult by the previous studies so far. The method by this study can promote the further utility of UAVs in LULC classification in rural areas in developing countries, thereby providing precise and reliable material for hydrological, hydraulic or ecosystem modelling, which eventually contributes to more accurate natural hazard risk assessment, rural development, and natural resource management.
利用无人机结合高程和反射率特征对农村地区进行精确的土地利用、土地利用变化和土壤侵蚀分类
近十年来,随着无人飞行器(UAV)的发展,高分辨率航空图像已被用于精确的土地利用/土地覆被分类(LULC)。然而,发展中国家农村地区的特殊结构,如传统茅草房,由于其外观不明显,在反射率和结构方面的特征容易混淆,给精确的土地利用、土地覆被分类带来了挑战。土地利用、土地利用变化和土地利用变化测绘至关重要,尤其是在数据高度稀缺和易受自然灾害影响的农村地区。随着无人机实现了高分辨率观测,提出能充分利用无人机优势的高精度 LULC 分类方法就显得尤为重要。为了强调农村地区常见 LULC 类型之间的差异,本研究提出了一个独创的指标--农村居住地分类指数(RCI)。RCI 的计算方法是地面以上高度与 NDVI 值与 1 之差的平方的乘积。然后,结合 RCI、传统阈值法和机器学习法,建立了一种综合分类方法。通过与传统阈值法、基于对象的图像分析法和随机森林法的比较,本研究的方法在检测茅草房方面取得了最高的总体准确率(总体准确率 = 0.903,kappa = 0.875)和分类准确率(用户准确率 = 0.802,生产者准确率 = 0.920)。这些研究结果表明,利用遥感数据识别农村地区易混淆结构是可行的,而这在以往的研究中是很难做到的。本研究的方法可进一步促进无人机在发展中国家农村地区 LULC 分类中的应用,从而为水文、水力或生态系统建模提供精确可靠的材料,最终有助于更准确地进行自然灾害风险评估、农村发展和自然资源管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Scientific African
Scientific African Multidisciplinary-Multidisciplinary
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.40%
发文量
332
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信