Heteronormative and cisnormative stereotypes in commonly-used social anxiety scales: A scoping review

Chantal Kasch , Cameron E. Lindsay , Stefan G. Hofmann
{"title":"Heteronormative and cisnormative stereotypes in commonly-used social anxiety scales: A scoping review","authors":"Chantal Kasch ,&nbsp;Cameron E. Lindsay ,&nbsp;Stefan G. Hofmann","doi":"10.1016/j.xjmad.2024.100091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Social anxiety is a common, but under-researched topic in the LGBTQIA+ community. We conducted a scoping review of studies between January 2014 and April 2024 that included LGBTQIA+ samples with social anxiety scales evaluating scales for outdated language. The search produced 1155 results out of which 17 articles fit the inclusion criteria. The results suggest that 47 % of the measures include items that reinforce heteronormative or cisnormative stereotypes and 29.4 % of studies included scales inappropriate for the population under investigation. Therefore, the wordings of certain items need to be adapted to fit the investigated population and a re-examination of the psychometric properties of the revised scales is needed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73841,"journal":{"name":"Journal of mood and anxiety disorders","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100091"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of mood and anxiety disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950004424000452","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Social anxiety is a common, but under-researched topic in the LGBTQIA+ community. We conducted a scoping review of studies between January 2014 and April 2024 that included LGBTQIA+ samples with social anxiety scales evaluating scales for outdated language. The search produced 1155 results out of which 17 articles fit the inclusion criteria. The results suggest that 47 % of the measures include items that reinforce heteronormative or cisnormative stereotypes and 29.4 % of studies included scales inappropriate for the population under investigation. Therefore, the wordings of certain items need to be adapted to fit the investigated population and a re-examination of the psychometric properties of the revised scales is needed.
常用社交焦虑量表中的异性恋和顺性恋定型观念:范围综述
在 LGBTQIA+ 群体中,社交焦虑是一个常见但研究不足的话题。我们对 2014 年 1 月至 2024 年 4 月期间纳入 LGBTQIA+ 样本并使用社交焦虑量表的研究进行了一次范围审查,对量表的过时语言进行了评估。搜索共产生了 1155 项结果,其中 17 篇文章符合纳入标准。结果表明,47% 的测量包含强化异性恋或顺性恋刻板印象的项目,29.4% 的研究包含不适合调查人群的量表。因此,需要对某些项目的措辞进行调整,以适应被调查人群的需要,并对修订后量表的心理测量特性进行重新审查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of mood and anxiety disorders
Journal of mood and anxiety disorders Applied Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Psychology (General), Behavioral Neuroscience
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信