Science motivation, academic achievement, career aspirations in early adolescents

IF 3.8 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL
David W. Putwain , Andrea Mallaburn , Tanja Held
{"title":"Science motivation, academic achievement, career aspirations in early adolescents","authors":"David W. Putwain ,&nbsp;Andrea Mallaburn ,&nbsp;Tanja Held","doi":"10.1016/j.lindif.2024.102577","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Studies have shown how expectancy and subjective task values (STVs) support, and perceived cost can undermine, science achievement and aspirations. Studies that combine multiple facets of STVs and cost with expectancy to explore impacts of science achievement and aspiration, in early adolescence, are lacking. The sample comprised 1240 students (498 males, mean age of 12.4 years) who self-reported expectancy, STVs, and cost. Between one and two weeks later students self-reported science aspirations and took a 30-min science test. A latent profile analysis indicated a four-profile solution was optimal. A profile comprised of high expectancy and STV, with low cost, showed the highest achievement and aspirations. In profiles where expectancy and STV were lower, or cost higher, achievement and aspirations were lower. Our findings imply classroom strategies, or interventions, to raise expectation and STV, and reduce cost, would benefit students at a critical age.</div></div><div><h3>Educational implications statement</h3><div>In students aged 11–14 years the highest science achievement and aspirations were found in a motivational profile where success was expected in combination with a perception of science being interesting/enjoyable, important, and useful, along with a perception that the cost of studying science (e.g., the effort involved) was low. Science achievement and aspirations were lower in motivational profiles where expectations and interest/enjoyment in science was lower, and cost was higher. Instructional strategies, interventions, and outreach activities, that raise accurate expectations of success and interest/enjoyment in science, and which reduce costs, would be possible ways to boost science aspirations and achievement.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48336,"journal":{"name":"Learning and Individual Differences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning and Individual Differences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1041608024001705","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Studies have shown how expectancy and subjective task values (STVs) support, and perceived cost can undermine, science achievement and aspirations. Studies that combine multiple facets of STVs and cost with expectancy to explore impacts of science achievement and aspiration, in early adolescence, are lacking. The sample comprised 1240 students (498 males, mean age of 12.4 years) who self-reported expectancy, STVs, and cost. Between one and two weeks later students self-reported science aspirations and took a 30-min science test. A latent profile analysis indicated a four-profile solution was optimal. A profile comprised of high expectancy and STV, with low cost, showed the highest achievement and aspirations. In profiles where expectancy and STV were lower, or cost higher, achievement and aspirations were lower. Our findings imply classroom strategies, or interventions, to raise expectation and STV, and reduce cost, would benefit students at a critical age.

Educational implications statement

In students aged 11–14 years the highest science achievement and aspirations were found in a motivational profile where success was expected in combination with a perception of science being interesting/enjoyable, important, and useful, along with a perception that the cost of studying science (e.g., the effort involved) was low. Science achievement and aspirations were lower in motivational profiles where expectations and interest/enjoyment in science was lower, and cost was higher. Instructional strategies, interventions, and outreach activities, that raise accurate expectations of success and interest/enjoyment in science, and which reduce costs, would be possible ways to boost science aspirations and achievement.
青少年的科学动机、学业成绩和职业理想
研究表明,期望值和主观任务价值(STVs)会支持科学成就和抱负,而感知到的成本则会削弱科学成就和抱负。目前还缺乏将主观任务价值和成本的多个方面与期望值相结合,以探讨对青少年科学成就和愿望的影响的研究。样本包括 1240 名学生(498 名男生,平均年龄为 12.4 岁),他们自我报告了期望值、STV 和成本。一至两周后,学生们自我报告了对科学的渴望,并参加了 30 分钟的科学测试。潜在特征分析表明,四种特征解决方案最为理想。由高期望值和 STV 以及低成本组成的方案显示出最高的成就和愿望。在期望值和 STV 值较低或成本较高的情况下,成绩和愿望都较低。我们的研究结果表明,提高期望值和 STV 值并降低成本的课堂策略或干预措施将使处于关键年龄段的学生受益匪浅。在对科学的期望和兴趣/乐趣较低、成本较高的动机特征中,科学成就和愿望较低。教学策略、干预措施和外联活动,如果能提高对成功的准确预期和对科学的兴趣/乐趣,并降低成本,将是提高科学志向和成就的可能途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Learning and Individual Differences
Learning and Individual Differences PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
2.80%
发文量
86
期刊介绍: Learning and Individual Differences is a research journal devoted to publishing articles of individual differences as they relate to learning within an educational context. The Journal focuses on original empirical studies of high theoretical and methodological rigor that that make a substantial scientific contribution. Learning and Individual Differences publishes original research. Manuscripts should be no longer than 7500 words of primary text (not including tables, figures, references).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信