Localized application of manure and fertilizers increases productivity of cereals, resource use efficiency and profitability in sub-Saharan Africa

IF 6 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Gudeta W. Sileshi , Laurie E. Drinkwater , Paswel Marenya , Sieglinde Snapp
{"title":"Localized application of manure and fertilizers increases productivity of cereals, resource use efficiency and profitability in sub-Saharan Africa","authors":"Gudeta W. Sileshi ,&nbsp;Laurie E. Drinkwater ,&nbsp;Paswel Marenya ,&nbsp;Sieglinde Snapp","doi":"10.1016/j.agee.2024.109347","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The combined use of livestock manure and synthetic fertilizers is considered as one of the climate smart and sustainable agricultural practices. However, farmers’ adoption and the benefits and costs of localized application of manure and fertilizers are not well-understood in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). Therefore, the objectives of this review and meta-analysis were to: (1) provide the evidence for joint adoption of livestock manure and synthetic fertilizers by smallholder farmers; (2) determine farmers’ manure placement practices and the intensity of manure application; and (3) provide a comparative analysis of the productivity of cereals, resource use efficiency and profitability with localized application of manure and synthetic fertilizers in SSA. Review of 32 studies indicated that adoption rates of livestock manure by smallholder farmers is: (1) as high as the adoption rates of synthetic fertilizers; and (2) conditional on the adoption of synthetic fertilizers, improved seeds and soil and water conservation practices. Meta-analyses of data from 106 studies across 19 African countries revealed that mean response ratios of cereals with spot-application (2.16), banding (2.07) or broadcasting (2.39) of manure and fertilizer are not significantly different. On the other hand, rain use efficiency was 43.6 % higher with spot-application than broadcasting of manure and fertilizer. The agronomic use efficiencies of nitrogen and phosphorus were also 15–39 % higher with spot-application than broadcasting. This indicates that localized application of manure and fertilizer can serve as an effective strategy to achieve more efficient utilization of the limited rainfall and applied nutrients by crops. The benefit to cost ratio of spot-application (6.7) was also 81.9 % higher than for broadcasting (3.7). The returns to farmers were estimated at 3.7–4.3 dollars for every dollar invested in manure or manure + fertilizers. It is conclude that spot-application or banding can significantly reduce the quantity of manure needed without compromising crop yields, resource use efficiency or profitability. This review has provided a much needed synthesis of research in ways that advance the understanding of integrating organic and inorganic fertilizers as critical inputs for soil health.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7512,"journal":{"name":"Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment","volume":"379 ","pages":"Article 109347"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167880924004651","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The combined use of livestock manure and synthetic fertilizers is considered as one of the climate smart and sustainable agricultural practices. However, farmers’ adoption and the benefits and costs of localized application of manure and fertilizers are not well-understood in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). Therefore, the objectives of this review and meta-analysis were to: (1) provide the evidence for joint adoption of livestock manure and synthetic fertilizers by smallholder farmers; (2) determine farmers’ manure placement practices and the intensity of manure application; and (3) provide a comparative analysis of the productivity of cereals, resource use efficiency and profitability with localized application of manure and synthetic fertilizers in SSA. Review of 32 studies indicated that adoption rates of livestock manure by smallholder farmers is: (1) as high as the adoption rates of synthetic fertilizers; and (2) conditional on the adoption of synthetic fertilizers, improved seeds and soil and water conservation practices. Meta-analyses of data from 106 studies across 19 African countries revealed that mean response ratios of cereals with spot-application (2.16), banding (2.07) or broadcasting (2.39) of manure and fertilizer are not significantly different. On the other hand, rain use efficiency was 43.6 % higher with spot-application than broadcasting of manure and fertilizer. The agronomic use efficiencies of nitrogen and phosphorus were also 15–39 % higher with spot-application than broadcasting. This indicates that localized application of manure and fertilizer can serve as an effective strategy to achieve more efficient utilization of the limited rainfall and applied nutrients by crops. The benefit to cost ratio of spot-application (6.7) was also 81.9 % higher than for broadcasting (3.7). The returns to farmers were estimated at 3.7–4.3 dollars for every dollar invested in manure or manure + fertilizers. It is conclude that spot-application or banding can significantly reduce the quantity of manure needed without compromising crop yields, resource use efficiency or profitability. This review has provided a much needed synthesis of research in ways that advance the understanding of integrating organic and inorganic fertilizers as critical inputs for soil health.
在撒哈拉以南非洲就地施用粪肥和化肥可提高谷物产量、资源利用效率和盈利能力
综合利用牲畜粪肥和合成肥料被认为是气候智能型可持续农业实践之一。然而,在撒哈拉以南非洲地区(SSA),农民对粪肥和化肥本地化施用的采用情况以及效益和成本并不十分了解。因此,本综述和荟萃分析旨在(1) 提供小农户共同采用牲畜粪肥和合成肥料的证据;(2) 确定农户的粪肥处理方法和粪肥施用强度;(3) 对撒哈拉以南非洲本地化施用粪肥和合成肥料的谷物生产率、资源利用效率和盈利能力进行比较分析。对 32 项研究的审查表明,小农采用牲畜粪肥的比例:(1) 与采用合成肥料的比例一样高;(2) 以采用合成肥料、改良种子和水土保持措施为条件。对 19 个非洲国家 106 项研究的数据进行的元分析表明,谷物对粪肥和化肥的点施(2.16)、带施(2.07)或撒施(2.39)的平均反应比没有显著差异。另一方面,粪肥点施比撒施的雨水利用率高 43.6%。定点施肥的氮和磷的农艺利用率也比撒施高 15-39%。这表明,局部施用粪肥和化肥可作为一种有效策略,使作物更有效地利用有限的降雨和施用的养分。定点施肥的效益成本比(6.7)也比广播施肥(3.7)高出 81.9%。据估计,农民在粪肥或粪肥+肥料上每投资 1 美元,可获得 3.7-4.3 美元的回报。结论是,定点施肥或带状施肥可在不影响作物产量、资源利用效率或收益率的情况下大幅减少粪肥需求量。本综述提供了亟需的研究综述,有助于加深对有机肥和无机肥结合作为土壤健康关键投入的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
392
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment publishes scientific articles dealing with the interface between agroecosystems and the natural environment, specifically how agriculture influences the environment and how changes in that environment impact agroecosystems. Preference is given to papers from experimental and observational research at the field, system or landscape level, from studies that enhance our understanding of processes using data-based biophysical modelling, and papers that bridge scientific disciplines and integrate knowledge. All papers should be placed in an international or wide comparative context.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信